Pemanfaatan Learning Management System (LMS) dalam penyelenggaraan dan analisis progress test

  • Winda Lestari
    Universitas Gunadarma
    Indonesia
  • Rena Fuji Erin Setyawati 
    Universitas Gunadarma
    Indonesia
  • Bhakti Gunawan
    Universitas Gunadarma
    Indonesia
  • Sri Mukti Suhartini
    Universitas Gunadarma
    Indonesia
  • Matrissya Hermita
    Universitas Gunadarma
    Indonesia
  • Ruddy J Suhatril
    Universitas Gunadarma
    Indonesia
  • Rama Dian Syah
    Universitas Gunadarma
    Indonesia

Abstract

Penilaian kemampuan mahasiswa kedokteran melalui progress test merupakan komponen penting dalam evaluasi pembelajaran berbasis Problem-Based Learning (PBL), namun pelaksanaan progress test secara konvensional memerlukan sumber daya dan upaya besar untuk menyediakan umpan balik indivual secara komprehensif. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengevaluasi efektivitas Learning Management Systems (LMS) V-Class sebagai media penyelenggaraan dan analisis progress test dalam konteks assessment for learning pada mahasiswa kedokteran. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan kuantitatif dengan desain kuasi eksperimental. Partisipan penelitian ini sejumlah 139 mahasiswa Fakultas Kedokteran Universitas Gunadarma Angkatan 2018-2021 yang telah mengikuti pembelajaran minimal dua semester pertama. Instrumen penelitian berupa soal progress test berbasis blueprint kurikulum yang diinput ke dalam LMS. Data hasil progress test diambil dari V-Class, kemudian dilanjutkan analisis butir menggunakan Microsoft Excel, serta evaluasi capaian belajar mahasiswa berdasarkan sistem menggunakan Uji Kruskal Wallis dan dilanjutkan dengan analisis Uji Wilcoxon. Hasil menunjukkan bahwa LMS mampu menyajikan total skor dan ketepatan jawaban per soal per mahasiswa, namun belum menyediakan analisis mendalam per blok pembelajaran. Rata-rata capaian tertinggi ditemukan pada topik komunikasi (66,67-100%) dan anatomi-patologi (49,24%-61,54%). Terdapat perbedaan rerata signifikan antar angkatan pada sejumlah topik (p<0,05). Penelitian ini menyimpulkan bahwa LMS memiliki potensi sebagai media assessment for learning, namun perlu pengembangan fitur analisis individual dan umpan balik berbasis topik. Temuan berdasar hasil penelitian ini berkontribusi pada pengembangan sistem evaluasi pembelajaran kedokteran berbasis teknologi dan mendukung efektivitas assessment for learning jangka panjang

Keywords
  • Progress test
  • Learning Management System (LMS)
  • Assessment for learning
  • Pendidikan kedokteran
  • Formative assessment
References
  1. Abdellatif, H., Alsemeh, A. E., Khamis, T., & Boulassel, M.-R. (2024). Exam blueprinting as a tool to overcome principal validity threats: A scoping review. Educación Médica, 25(3), 100906. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edumed.2024.100906
  2. Alam, S. S., & Jianu, R. (2017). Analyzing Eye-Tracking Information in Visualization and Data Space: From Where on the Screen to What on the Screen. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 23(5), 1492–1505. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2016.2535340
  3. Alavarce, D. C., de Medeiros, M. L., de Araújo Viana, D., Abade, F., Vieira, J. E., Machado, J. L. M., & Collares, C. F. (2024). The progress test as a structuring initiative for programmatic assessment. BMC Medical Education, 24(1), 555. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-024-05537-5
  4. Ali, K., Cockerill, J., Zahra, D., Tredwin, C., & Ferguson, C. (2018). Impact of Progress testing on the learning experiences of students in medicine, dentistry and dental therapy. BMC Medical Education, 18(1), 253. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-018-1357-1
  5. Ali, K., Coombes, L., Kay, E., Tredwin, C., Jones, G., Ricketts, C., & Bennett, J. (2016). Progress testing in undergraduate dental education: the Peninsula experience and future opportunities. European Journal of Dental Education : Official Journal of the Association for Dental Education in Europe, 20(3), 129–134. https://doi.org/10.1111/eje.12149
  6. Alwan, I. A., Magzoub, M. E., & Elzubeir, M. (2012). International Handbook of Medical Education: A Guide for Students. SAGE Publications.
  7. Berry, R. (2008). Assessment for Learning. Hong Kong University Press.
  8. Coombes, L., Ricketts, C., Freeman, A., & Stratford, J. (2010). Beyond assessment: feedback for individuals and institutions based on the progress test. Medical Teacher, 32(6), 486–490. https://doi.org/10.3109/0142159X.2010.485652
  9. Dent, J., & Harden, R. M. (2013). A Practical Guide for Medical Teachers E-Book. Elsevier Health Sciences.
  10. Findyartini, A., Werdhani, R. A., Iryani, D., Rini, E. A., Kusumawati, R., Poncorini, E., & Primaningtyas, W. (2015). Collaborative progress test (cPT) in three medical schools in Indonesia: the validity, reliability and its use as a curriculum evaluation tool. Medical Teacher, 37(4), 366–373. https://doi.org/10.3109/0142159X.2014.948831
  11. Freeman, A., Van der Vleuten, C., Nouns, Z., & Ricketts, C. (2010). Progress testing internationally. Medical Teacher, 32, 451–455. https://doi.org/10.3109/0142159X.2010.485231
  12. Given, K., Hannigan, A., & McGrath, D. (2016). Red, yellow and green: What does it mean? How the progress test informs and supports student progress. Medical Teacher, 38(10), 1025–1032. https://doi.org/10.3109/0142159X.2016.1147533
  13. Kusairi, S. (2020). A web-based formative feedback system using isomorphic items to support Physics learning. Journal of Technology and Science Education, 10, 117. https://doi.org/10.3926/jotse.781
  14. Moursy, N. A., Hamsho, K., Gaber, A. M., Ikram, M. F., & Sajid, M. R. (2025). A systematic review of progress test as longitudinal assessment in Saudi Arabia. BMC Medical Education, 25(1), 100. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-025-06671-4
  15. Munir. (2009). Pembelajaran Jarak Jauh berbasis Teknologi Informasi dan Komunikasi (TIK) [Distance Learning based on Information and Communication Technology (ICT)].
  16. Reberti, A., Monfredini, N., Filho, O., Andrade, D., Pinheiro, C., & Silva, J. (2020). Progress Test in Medical School: a Systematic Review of the Literature. Revista Brasileira de Educação Médica, 44. https://doi.org/10.1590/1981-5271v44.1-20190194.ing
  17. Sieg, M., Roselló Atanet, I., Tomova, M. T., Schoeneberg, U., Sehy, V., Mäder, P., & März, M. (2023). Discovering unknown response patterns in progress test data to improve the estimation of student performance. BMC Medical Education, 23(1), 193. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-023-04172-w
  18. Troncon, L. E. de A., Elias, L. L. K., Osako, M. K., Romão, E. A., Bollela, V. R., & Moriguti, J. C. (2023). Reflections on the use of the Progress Test in the programmatic student assessment. Revista Brasileira de Educação Médica, 47(2), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1590/1981-5271v47.2-2022-0334.ing
  19. van der Vleuten, C., Freeman, A., & Collares, C. F. (2018). Progress test utopia. Perspectives on Medical Education, 7(2), 136–138. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40037-018-0413-1
  20. van Wijk, E., Donkers, J., Laat, P., Meiboom, A., Jacobs, B., Ravesloot, J., Tio, R., Vleuten, C., Langers, A., & Bremers, A. (2024). Computer Adaptive vs. Non-adaptive Medical Progress Testing: Feasibility, Test Performance, and Student Experiences. Perspectives on Medical Education, 13. https://doi.org/10.5334/pme.1345
  21. Walsh, K. (2010). Cost Effectiveness in Medical Education. Radcliffe Pub.
  22. Wrigley, W., van der Vleuten, C. P. M., Freeman, A., & Muijtjens, A. (2012). A systemic framework for the progress test: strengths, constraints and issues: AMEE Guide No. 71. Medical Teacher, 34(9), 683–697. https://doi.org/10.3109/0142159X.2012.704437

Downloads

PDF

Statistic

Abstract Views
: 128 times
PDF
: 17 times