Scrutiny on the grammatical error of descriptive text written by the first semester public health students Universitas Faletehan

  • Kety Soraya 
    Universitas faletahan
    Indonesia

Abstract

In English Competency the students should master four skills namely speaking, reading, writing and listening. On the other hand most of students found many barriers to achieve this competency, particularly in writing due to writing is not simple but writing is long process. This study is intended to analyze, find out the types of errors, and the factors for grammatical error in students composition. The use of articles, verbs, adjectives, adverbs, nouns, preposition, and conjunctions are the focus of the analysis. The errors are analyzed through the procedure of identification, description, categorization, classification, calculation and interpretation. The errors were then classified into four types namely omission, addition, misformation, and misordering then they were counted and interpreted. Altogether they were 1401errors in student’s descriptive text. They covered 495 (35.33%) errors of articles, 280 (19.98%) errors of nouns, 225 (16.05%) errors of preposition, 116 (8.27%) errors of adjectives, 62 (5.42%) errors of verb, 58 (5.07%) errors of conjunction, 44 (3.84%) errors of pronouns, and 110 (7.85%) errors of verbs. Based on the type of errors omission errors got the highest frequency. It happened 475 (33.9%) followed by misformation and misordering, addition errors 190 (13.56%). There were various frequencies of errors found from each type. Omission errors included 200 (35.33%) from 495 errors of articles, Nouns 90 (19.98%) from 280 error of nouns, preposition 70 (16.05%) from 225 errors of prepositions, conjunction 40 (4.99%) from 70 errors of conjunction, pronoun 30 (4.63%) from 65 of pronouns, verb 40 (7.85%) from 40 errors of verbs, adjective 30 (8.27%) from 30 errors of adjectives. Addition errors 50 ( 16.05.33%) from 225 errors of preposition, nouns 35 (19.98 %) from 280 errors of nouns and adjective 30 (2.85%) from 30 adjectives. The misordering errors of articles are clearly seen that they got the highest frequency among others. It took place 200 times (35.33%) from 495 of articles. Great tendency to omit and misform, article, nouns, and preposition is influenced by the skill habit of L1, as well as misordering errors of articles, preposition, nouns, and adjective. It is interpreted hat differences of the structure of L1 and L2 greattly influence the learners to make grammatical errors in writing English composition. Another factor that the causes the errors in incomplete of the target language itself.

Keywords
  • Grammar
  • Descriptive Text and writing skill
References
  1. Alma H. Buchari. 2012. Belajar Mudah Penelitian. Alfabeta: Bandung
  2. Arikunto Suharsimi, 2010. Prosedur Penelitian. PT Rineka Cipta
  3. Blannin, J., Mahat, M., Cleveland, B., Morris, J. E., & Imms, W. (2020). Teachers as
  4. embedded practitioner-researchers in innovative learning environments. Center for
  5. Educational Policy Studies Journal, 10(3), 99–116.https://doi.org/10.26529/cepsj.887
  6. Brown, H. Douglas Brown.2000. Principle of Language Learning and Teaching.4th Edition.
  7. New York: Longman.
  8. Bilgier, S., & Studies, S. (2020). Political Knowledge and Political Behavior among Highly
  9. Educated Muslims in Indonesia Ija Suntana 1 & Betty Tresnawaty 2. 11(4), 149–174.
  10. Belo, P.M. (2017). An analysis of Grammatical Errors in Written Descriptive Text by the first
  11. Year of vocational school of Economic and Commerce Becora, Dili East Timor:in
  12. School Year 2016/2017. IJAR
  13. Claudia, Leacock., Chodorow, Martin., Gamon, Michael, Tetreaul, Joe., Hirzt, Graeme.
  14. Automated Grammatical Error Detection for language Learner.(z-lib.org).
  15. Dullay, Heady, Burt, Marina, Krashen, Stephen, 1982. Language Two. New York: Oxford
  16. University Press.
  17. Eli Hinkle, Handbook of Research in Second language and learning Volume 11 (2011)
  18. I.P.B. Erlangga. I.W. Suarnajay, P.A.K. Juniarta. An Analysis of Grammatical Error Made by
  19. The seventh Grade Students of SMPN 2 Sukawati in Writing Descriptive Text.
  20. Singaraja: Indonesia.
  21. Leacock, C., Chodorow, M., Gamon., M., Tetreault., J., Hirst, G. Automated Grammatical Error
  22. Detectionfor Laguage Learner. 2010. Morgan & Claypool Publisher.
  23. Nida, E, A.1949. Morphology, The Descriptive Analysis of Word. Ann Arbor: The
  24. University of Michigan Press.
  25. Nganga, L. (2019). Preservice teachers’ perceptions and preparedness to teach for global
  26. mindedness and social justice using collaboration, critical thinking, creativity and
  27. communication (4cs). Journal of Social Studies Education Research, 10(4), 26–57.
  28. Puspita, Dara.(2018) An analysis Gramatical Error in Writing Descriptive Text Among
  29. the Eighth Graders at SMPN 3 Batanghari East Lampung. Lampung:
  30. Richard, J.C. Schmidt, Richad,.2000. language Teaching applied Linguistic.3th edition.
  31. Raiker, A. (2020). Praxis, pedagogy and teachers’ professionalism in England. Center for
  32. Educational Policy Studies Journal, 10(3), 11–30. https://doi.org/10.26529/cepsj.874
  33. Rini, Melianti. An Analysis on Student”s Grammatical Error in Descriptive Text Writing.
  34. UIN Syarief Hidayatullah Jakarta. 2013.
  35. Solikhah, I., & Budiharso, T. (2019). Investigating the learning outcomes of an INQF-based
  36. english language teaching curriculum in Indonesia. Journal of Social Studies Education Research, 10(4), 153–175.
  37. Studies, S., & Bilgiler, S. (2020). Political Knowledge and Political Behavior among Highly Educated Muslims in Indonesia Ija Suntana 1 & Betty Tresnawaty 2. 11(4), 149–174
  38. Tausif, M. R., & Haque, M. I. (2021). Managing quality in university framework: Students’ perspective. Management Science Letters, 11, 627–636. https://doi.org/10.5267/j.msl.2020.9.004
  39. Yu, M. L., Hamid, S., Ijab, M. T., & Soo, H. P. (2009). The e-balanced scorecard (e-BSC)
  40. for measuring academic staff performance excellence. Higher Education, 57(6), 813- 828. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-009-9197-x

Downloads

PDF

Statistic

Abstract Views
: 376 times
PDF
: 0 times