Pengembangan Instrumen Konsep Diri dalam Manajemen Waktu Pada Siswa Kelas XI Sekolah Menengah Kejuruan

  • Iqbal Zakki Jannati 
    Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha
    Indonesia
  • Nyoman Dantes
    Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha
    Indonesia

Abstract

The purpose of this study: to determine the validity of the self-concept scale for time management in class XI students of SMK Negeri 1 Singaraja. Using a stratified random sampling technique and to determine the reliability of the items in the self-concept instrument in time management in class XI students of SMK Negeri 1 Singaraja. This study uses research and development methods (Research & Development). The validity test involved 5 experts, 3 guidance counseling lecturers and 2 practitioners counseling teachers at Vocational High Schools. The sample was selected 100 class XI students from a total of 1129 students of SMK Negeri 1 Singaraja. The results of this study are the low intelligence of time management in students and the inadequate availability of instruments in schools. The results of the CVR calculation obtained ∑CVR with the number 34.8. So it can be concluded that 34.8 > 0, which means that the contents of the interpersonal intelligence scale items fulfill the criteria (valid). The results of the CVI calculation obtained a result of 0.96 which included very suitable criteria.
Keywords
  • Time Management
  • Students
  • Counseling Guidance
References
  1. Alias, Siti Nursaila dkk. (2015). The Level of Mastering Forces in Equilibrium Topics by Thinking Skills. International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding (IJMMU) Vol. 2, No. 5 : University Sains Malaysia, Pulau Pinang, Malaysia (diakses tanggal 28 oktober 2015).
  2. Arikunto, S. 2010. Prosedur Penelitian Suatu Pendekatan Praktik. Jakarta:
  3. Rineka Cipta
  4. Arikunto, Suharsimi. (2012). Dasar-dasar Evaluasi Pendidikan. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
  5. Arifin, Zaenal. 2012. Evaluasi Pembelajaran. Bandung : Rosda Karya.
  6. Fraenkel, J.C, and Wallen, N.E. (2006). How to Design and Evaluate Research in
  7. Education. New York: McGraw-Hill, inc.
  8. Gafni, R., & Geri, N. 2010.Time management; Procrastination tendency in individual and collaborative tasks.
  9. Kartono. (2018). Mengukur dan Mengembangkan Konsep Diri Anak Menuju Terbentuknya Kepribadian Anak. Ilmiah Kependidikan, 5(2), 135–146.
  10. Reski, N., Taufik, & Ifdil. (2017). Konsep diri dan kedisiplinan belajar siswa. Jurnal Educatio: Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia, 3(2), 85–91. Resnick, L. B. (1987). Education and learning to think. Washington, D.C: National Academy Press.
  11. Nurhidayati, D. D. (2016). Peningkatan Pemahaman Manajemen Waktu Melalui Bimbingan Kelompok Dengan Teknik Problem Solving pada Siswa. PSIKOPEDAGOGIA Jurnal Bimbingan Dan Konseling, 5(1)
  12. Sasmita, E. (2013). Pengatuh Kesiapan Belaajar, Disiplin Belajar, Dan Manajemen Waktu Terhadap Motivasi Belajar Mata Diklat Bekerjasama Dengan Kolega Dan Pelanggan Pada Siswa Kelas X Program Keahlian Administrasi Perkantoran Di SMK Negri 2 Semarang.
  13. Setyosari, Punaji. (2012). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan dan Pengembangan. Kencana : Jakarta.
  14. Suherman, Erman dkk. 2003. Strategi Pembelajaran Matematika Kontemporer. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya.
  15. Riduwan. (2011). Belajar Mudah Penelitian. Alfabeta : Bandung.
  16. Lubis, Mawardi. (2008). Evaluasi Pendidikan Nilai. Yogyakarta : Pustaka Pelajar.
  17. Lawshe, C. H. (1975). A Quantitative Approach To Content Validity. A Paper Presented at Content Validity, a Converence Held at Bowling Green. State Uneversity, 28(4).
  18. Manktelow, J. 2010. Manage your time, Raih keberhasilan dengan mengelola waktu Anda.
  19. Sukmadinta, Nana Syaodih. (2012). Metodologi Penelitian Pendidikan. Bandung : Rosda Karya.
  20. Indrakusuma, Amier Daien. (1966). Evaluasi Pendidikan Penilaian Hasil Belajar, tidak diterbitkan.
  21. Sudijono, Anas. (2008). Pengantar Evaluasi Pendidikan. Jakarta : Raja Grafindo Persada.
  22. Sugiyono, 2009, Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan R&D, Bandung : Alfabeta.
  23. Sugiyono, 2013. Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan R&D, Bandung : Alfabeta.
  24. Hadjar, Ibnu. (1996). Dasar-dasar Metodologi Penelitian Kuantitatif dalam Pendidikan. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada.
  25. Sevilla, Consuello dkk. 2006. Pengantar Metode Penelitian. Jakarta : UI-Press
  26. Djemari, M. (2008). Teknik penyusunan instrumen tes dan non tes. Yogyakarta: Mitra Cendekia
  27. Sandra, K. (2013). Manajemen Waktu, Efikasi-Diri Dan Prokrastinasi. Persona:Jurnal Psikologi Indonesia, 2(3), 217–222.
  28. Steel, P. 2017. The Nature Of Procrastination: A Meta Analytic And Theoretical Review Of Quintes Sential Self Regulatory Failure. Psychological Bulletin, 133(1), 65–94.
  29. Yusup, F. (2018). Uji Validitas dan Reliabilitas Instrumen Penelitian Kuantitatif. Jurnal Tarbiyah : Jurnal Ilmiah Kependidikan, 7(1), 17–23.
  30. Sugiyono. (2015). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.
  31. Thiagarajan, S., Semmel, D. S., & Semmel M. I. 1974. Instructional Development for Training Teachers of Expectional Children. Minneapolis, Minnesota: Leadership Training Institute/Special Education, University of Minnesota.
  32. Zaenal Arifin, (2017). Instrument criteria in a study: Journal of THEOREMS (The Original Research of Mathematics) Vol. 2 No. 1, Juli 2017, hal. 28-36.

Downloads

PDF

Statistic

Abstract Views
: 1129 times
PDF
: 0 times