Problem psikologis danstrategi coping pada pelaksana upacara adat rambu solo’tana’ bulaan miskin di dusun pambalan

Abstract

Tana Toraja is a unique area where its customs are very well known, one of which is the solo sign (traditional death ceremony), although the consequences are not good it can even cause psychological problems, such as stress, anxiety, depression and other effects, until now there are still many perpetrators tana' bulaan who are still trying to perform the traditional signs ceremony solo' in accordance with the tradition that applies to family members who die. This study aims to find out psychological problems and how coping strategies are used by the performers of the traditional signs ceremony in tana'bulaan impoverished. The research design uses a qualitative phenomenological method. Collecting data using observation and interview techniques. The sample in this study were 2 participants who were selected by snowball or chain sampling with the characteristics of the Toraja people who perform the traditional ceremonies for signs solo', tana'bulaan, poor in Pambalan Village. The results of the study show that there are several themes involved in psychological problems and coping strategies, including the view of the solo sign, that the solo sign is a custom that must be preserved and is the final tribute to family or relatives who have died. It was also found that there was a stress reaction because of the solo signs. Stress coping strategies, where there are several coping strategies for the two participants such as cognitive assessment, emotional focused coping, and problem focused coping. Protection factors against stress include social support, preparation and planning. As well as found risk factors for stress, such as lack of emotional expression and lack of self-acceptance.
References
  1. AA, Abdul Latif. (2018). Metode Penelitian Psikologi.
  2. https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/2b4jq
  3. Abdurrahim, A. (2015). Makna Biaya Dalam upacara rambu solo. Jurnal Akuntansi
  4. Multiparadigma, 6(2). https://doi.org/10.18202/jamal.2015.08.6014
  5. Kartono, K. (1985). Bimbingan dan dasar-dasar pelaksanaannya: teknik bimbingan
  6. praktis. Rajawali, Jakarta.
  7. Carver, C. S., Scheier, M. F., & Weintraub, J. K. (1989). Assessing coping strategies:
  8. A theoretically based approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56(2), 267–283. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.56.2.267
  9. Kobong, T. (2008). Injil dan Tongkonan: inkarnasi, kontekstualisasi, transformasi.
  10. BPK Gunung Mulia.
  11. Sjaifudian, H. (2003). Inovasi, partisipasi, dan good governance:
  12. prakarsa inovatif dan partisipatif di Indonesia. Yayasan Obor Indonesia.
  13. Crider, A., Goethals, G., Kavanaugh, R., & Solomon, P. (1986). Psychology, Scott,
  14. Foresman and Company. Illinois, England.
  15. Moleong, L. J. (2000). Metodologi penelitian kualitatif, cet. XI. Bandung: PT Remaja
  16. Rosdakarya.
  17. Nurdin, I., & Hartati, S. (2019). Metodologi penelitian sosial. Media Sahabat
  18. Cendekia.
  19. Fan, J. X., & Zick, C. D. (2004). The economic burden of health care, funeral, and
  20. burial expenditures at the end of life. Journal of Consumer Affairs, 38(1), 35-55.
  21. Chaplin, J. P. (2006). Kamus lengkap psikologi (terjemahan Kartini Kartono). Jakarta: PT. Raja Grafindo.
  22. Kavanagh, D. (1986). Stress, Appraisal and CopingS. Lazarus and S. Folkman, New
  23. York: Springer, 1984, pp. 444, $31.95. Behavioral and Cognitive Psychotherapy, 14(4), 345-345. doi:10.1017/S0141347300015019
  24. Putriana, A. (2018). Kecemasan dan strategi coping pada wanita korban
  25. kekerasan dalam pacaran. Psikoborneo, 6(3), 453-461.
  26. Lusi, R. A., & Yuwanto, L. (2020). Aspek-Aspek Psikologis pada Prosesi Rambu
  27. Solo’(Tinjauan Teori Religiusitas). Insight: Jurnal Pemikiran Dan Penelitian
  28. Psikologi, 16 (2), 336–346.
  29. Marwing, A. (2011). Problem psikologis dan strategi coping pelaku upacara
  30. kematian rambu solo’di toraja (studi fenomenologi pada tana’ bulaan). Psikoislamika: Jurnal Psikologi dan Psikologi Islam, 8(2).2
  31. Mu’Tadin.(2002). Pengelolaan stres. Palembang : Wijaya Pustaka.
  32. Moustakas, C. (1994). Phenomenological research methods. Sage publications.
  33. Oktaviani, F., Djamal, N. N., & Sunardi, I. (2018). Gambaran coping strategy
  34. pada remaja putri yang melakukan pernikahan dini. Psympathic: Jurnal Ilmiah Psikologi, 5(1), 23-42.
  35. Panggarra, R. (2014). Konflik Kebudayaan Menurut Teori Lewis Alfred
  36. Coser Dan Relevansinya Dalam Upacara Pemakaman (Rambu Solo’) Di Tana Toraja. Jurnal Jaffray, 12(2), 291-316.
  37. Patadungan, E., Purwanto, A., & Waani, F. J. (2020). Dampak
  38. Perubahan Status Sosial terhadap Upacara Rambu Solo’di Kelurahan Tondon Mamullu Kecamatan Makale Kabupaten Tana Toraja. Holistik, Journal Of Social and Culture.
  39. Poerwanto, A. (2017). Pengaruh Terapi Storytelling Terhadap Tingkat
  40. Kecemasan Dan Problem Focused Coping Mahasiswa Yang Sedang Skripsi. Jurnal Bimbingan dan Konseling, 34(2), 61-71.
  41. Anggara, roby (2014) konflik kebudayaan menurut teori Lewis Alfred Coser dan
  42. relevansinya dsalam upacara pemakaman(rambu solo) di Tanah Toraja. jurnal jaffray , 12(2)
  43. Wahyuningsih, D. (2018). Representasi ritual upacara kematian adat suku
  44. Toraja dalam program dokumenter Indonesia Bagus NET TV episode Toraja. Ejournal Ilmu Komunikasi, 6(1), 68-82.
  45. Sirajuddin, S. N. (2013). Beberapa Motivasi Masyarakat Toraja Memotong
  46. Ternak Kerbau Pada Acara Adat (Rambu Solo’ dan Rambu Tuka’). Jurnal Ilmu dan Industri Peternakan, 1(1).
  47. Stroebe, M., Schut, H., & Stroebe, W. (2007). Health outcomes of
  48. bereavement. The Lancet, 370(9603), 1960-1973.
  49. Tempo. (2001, Juni Minggu). Mencuri Mayat di nirwana (Rubrik selingan)
  50. Uno,H.H.B.2009. Teori motivasi dan pengukurannya. Jakarta: penerbit bumi aksara.
  51. Handoko, M. 1992. Motivasi daya gerak tingka laku. Yogjakarta : penerbit kanisius.
  52. Y.A. Sarira, rambu solo’ dan persepsi orang kristen tentang rambu solo’(tana Toraja: pusbang Gereja Toraja,
  53. ta),63.