1. Home
  2. Vol 9, No 2 (2023)
  3. Zatrahadi

Analisis Dampak Sosial Efek Bandwagon Pada Eksistensi Remaja: Studi di Kota Pekanbaru dan Kota Bukitinggi

M. Fahli Zatrahadi (1), Darmawati Darmawati (2), Rahmad Rahmad (3), Syarifah Syarifah (4), Nur Arsy (5),
(1) Universitas Islam Negeri Sultan Syarif Kasim  Indonesia
(2) Universitas Islam Negeri Sultan Syarif Kasim  Indonesia
(3) Universitas Islam Negeri Sultan Syarif Kasim  Indonesia
(4) Universitas Islam Negeri Sultan Syarif Kasim  Indonesia
(5) Universitas Islam Negeri Sultan Syarif Kasim  Indonesia

Corresponding Author
Copyright (c) 2023 M. Fahli Zatrahadi, Darmawati Darmawati, Rahmad Rahmad, Syarifah Syarifah, Nur Arsy

DOI : https://doi.org/10.29210/1202323581

Full Text:    Language : en

Abstract


Teenagers have a strong sense of their individual identity, interests, and personal desires and tend to be better able to defend themselves so as not to be affected by the bandwagon. The aim of this research is to analyze the social impact of the bandwagon effect on the existence of teenagers in Pekanbaru City and Bukitinggi City. The research method uses a qualitative approach. Nine informants came from the cities of Pekanbaru and Bukit Tinggi. Informants came from the Tourism, Youth, and Sports Agency, the Latah Tuah Studio, and the Titian Rang Mudo Art Studio. According to the research, there are many advantages for teenagers who actively support the preservation of Minang and Malay culture and are not subject to the harmful bandwagon effect. They have a deep understanding of their culture, strengthen their identity, contribute to cultural preservation, increase respect for other cultures, create communities and networks, and develop their skills and talents. They can strengthen their cultural heritage, develop a sense of pride and self-esteem, and promote intercultural tolerance and understanding.

Keywords


Bandwagon Effect, Malay Culture, Minang Culture, Social Impact.

References


Abrahamson, E., & Rosenkopf, L. (1993). Institutional and competitive bandwagons: Using mathematical modeling as a tool to explore innovation diffusion. Academy of Management Review, 18(3), 487–517.

Abrahamson, E., & Rosenkopf, L. (1997). Social network effects on the extent of innovation diffusion: A computer simulation. Organization Science, 8(3), 289–309.

Anantharaman, R., Prashar, S., & Vijay, T. S. (2022). Uncovering the role of consumer trust and bandwagon effect influencing purchase intention: an empirical investigation in social commerce platforms. Journal of Strategic Marketing, 1–21.

Arikunto, S. (2010). Metode peneltian. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Barnfield, M. (2020). Think twice before jumping on the bandwagon: Clarifying concepts in research on the bandwagon effect. Political Studies Review, 18(4), 553–574.

Belsky, J. (2019). Early-life adversity accelerates child and adolescent development. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 28(3), 241–246.

Bindra, S., Sharma, D., Parameswar, N., Dhir, S., & Paul, J. (2022). Bandwagon effect revisited: A systematic review to develop future research agenda. Journal of Business Research, 143, 305–317.

Brandão, C. (2015). P. Bazeley and K. Jackson, Qualitative Data Analysis with NVivo (2nd ed.) . Qualitative Research in Psychology, 12(4), 492–494. https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2014.992750

Cacioppo, J. T., & Cacioppo, S. (2014). Social relationships and health: The toxic effects of perceived social isolation. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 8(2), 58–72.

Cai, F., & Wyer Jr, R. S. (2015). The impact of mortality salience on the relative effectiveness of donation appeals. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 25(1), 101–112.

Caplan, S. E. (2003). Preference for online social interaction: A theory of problematic Internet use and psychosocial well-being. Communication Research, 30(6), 625–648.

Cho, E., Kim-Vick, J., & Yu, U.-J. (2022). Unveiling motivation for luxury fashion purchase among Gen Z consumers: need for uniqueness versus bandwagon effect. International Journal of Fashion Design, Technology and Education, 15(1), 24–34.

Clemmens, D. (2003). Adolescent motherhood: A meta-synthesis of qualitative studies. MCN: The American Journal of Maternal/Child Nursing, 28(2), 93–99.

Cope, D. G. (2014). Computer-assisted qualitative data analysis software. Oncology Nursing Forum, 41(3).

Diananda, A. (2019). Psikologi remaja dan permasalahannya. ISTIGHNA: Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Pemikiran Islam, 1(1), 116–133.

Frenzel, A. C., Goetz, T., Pekrun, R., & Watt, H. M. G. (2010). Development of mathematics interest in adolescence: Influences of gender, family, and school context. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 20(2), 507–537.

Fu, W. W., & Sim, C. C. (2011). Aggregate bandwagon effect on online videos’ viewership: Value uncertainty, popularity cues, and heuristics. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 62(12), 2382–2395.

Hadland, S. E., Werb, D., Kerr, T., Fu, E., Wang, H., Montaner, J. S., & Wood, E. (2012). Childhood sexual abuse and risk for initiating injection drug use: A prospective cohort study. Preventive Medicine, 55(5), 500–504. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2012.08.015

House, B. R., Kanngiesser, P., Barrett, H. C., Broesch, T., Cebioglu, S., Crittenden, A. N., Erut, A., Lew-Levy, S., Sebastian-Enesco, C., & Smith, A. M. (2020). Universal norm psychology leads to societal diversity in prosocial behaviour and development. Nature Human Behaviour, 4(1), 36–44.

Jackson, S., & Goossens, L. (2020). Handbook of adolescent development.

Kastanakis, M. N., & Balabanis, G. (2012). Between the mass and the class: Antecedents of the “bandwagon” luxury consumption behavior. Journal of Business Research, 65(10), 1399–1407.

Khani Jeihooni, A., Amirkhani, M., Rakhshani, T., Hasirini, P. A., & Jormand, H. (2021). Factors associated with suicidal ideation in drug addicts based on the theory of planned behavior. BMC Psychiatry, 21(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-021-03387-9

Kilpatrick, D. G., Acierno, R., Saunders, B., Resnick, H. S., Best, C. L., & Schnurr, P. P. (2000). Risk factors for adolescent substance abuse and dependence: Data from a national sample. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 68(1), 19–30. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.68.1.19

Kim, H.-S., & Sundar, S. S. (2014). Can online buddies and bandwagon cues enhance user participation in online health communities? Computers in Human Behavior, 37, 319–333.

Kim, J., & Gambino, A. (2016). Do we trust the crowd or information system? Effects of personalization and bandwagon cues on users’ attitudes and behavioral intentions toward a restaurant recommendation website. Computers in Human Behavior, 65, 369–379.

Kim, J., Kang, S., & Lee, K. H. (2020). How social capital impacts the purchase intention of sustainable fashion products. Journal of Business Research, 117, 596–603.

King, K. A., Tergerson, J. L., & Wilson, B. R. (2008). Effect of social support on adolescents’ perceptions of and engagement in physical activity. Journal of Physical Activity and Health, 5(3), 374–384.

Kumar, V. V., & Tankha, G. (2020). Influence of achievement motivation and psychological adjustment on academic achievement: A cross-sectional study of school students. Humanities & Social Sciences Reviews, 8(1), 532–538.

Kwek, C. L., Lei, B., Leong, L. Y., & Peh, Y. X. (2020). The Impacts of Online Comments and Bandwagon Effect on the Perceived Credibility of the Information in Social Commerce: The Moderating Role of Perceived Acceptance. 8th International Conference of Entrepreneurship and Business Management Untar (ICEBM 2019), 451–460.

Larson, R. W., & Verma, S. (1999). How children and adolescents spend time across the world: work, play, and developmental opportunities. Psychological Bulletin, 125(6), 701.

Leibenstein, H. (1950). Bandwagon, snob, and Veblen effects in the theory of consumers’ demand. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 64(2), 183–207.

Li, R. (2017). Can interactive media attenuate psychological reactance? A study of the role played by user commenting and audience metrics in promoting persuasion. The Pennsylvania State University.

Manca, F., Sivakumar, A., & Polak, J. W. (2019). The effect of social influence and social interactions on the adoption of a new technology: The use of bike sharing in a student population. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 105, 611–625.

McNamara, G. M., Haleblian, J., & Dykes, B. J. (2008). The performance implications of participating in an acquisition wave: Early mover advantages, bandwagon effects, and the moderating influence of industry characteristics and acquirer tactics. Academy of Management Journal, 51(1), 113–130.

Meoli, A., Fini, R., Sobrero, M., & Wiklund, J. (2020). How entrepreneurial intentions influence entrepreneurial career choices: The moderating influence of social context. Journal of Business Venturing, 35(3), 105982.

Munawarah, M., Latipun, L., & Amalia, S. (2019). Kontribusi dukungan teman sebaya terhadap regulasi diri pada remaja. PSIKOVIDYA, 23(2), 150–163.

Papageorge, N. W., Zahn, M. V, Belot, M., Van den Broek-Altenburg, E., Choi, S., Jamison, J. C., & Tripodi, E. (2021). Socio-demographic factors associated with self-protecting behavior during the Covid-19 pandemic. Journal of Population Economics, 34(2), 691–738.

Payne, M. (2018). Social construction in social work and social action. In Constructing social work practices (pp. 25–66). Routledge.

Pitoewas, B. (2018). Pengaruh lingkungan sosial dan sikap remaja terhadap perubahan tata nilai. JPK (Jurnal Pancasila Dan Kewarganegaraan), 3(1), 8–18.

Price, C. A., Kares, F., Segovia, G., & Loyd, A. B. (2019). Staff matter: Gender differences in science, technology, engineering or math (STEM) career interest development in adolescent youth. Applied Developmental Science, 23(3), 239–254.

Quarmby, T., Sandford, R., & Pickering, K. (2019). Care-experienced youth and positive development: An exploratory study into the value and use of leisure-time activities. Leisure Studies, 38(1), 28–42.

Raco, J. (2018). Metode penelitian kualitatif: jenis, karakteristik dan keunggulannya.

Rakanda, D. R. (2020). Penggunaan Media Sosial Instagram dalam Pembentukan Identitas Diri Generasi Z atau Igeneration di Desa Cawas. Universitas Pembangunan Nasional Veteran Yogyakarta.

Ratih, R. N. (2020). Pengaruh Metode Pembelajaran Snowball Throwing Terhadap Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Peserta Didik Pada Mata Pelajaran Akidah Akhlak di MTs Qodiriyah …. repository.iainkudus.ac.id. http://repository.iainkudus.ac.id/4475/

Reicher, S. D., Spears, R., & Postmes, T. (1995). A social identity model of deindividuation phenomena. European Review of Social Psychology, 6(1), 161–198.

Rufaida, S. A., Wardani, I. Y., & Panjaitan, R. U. (2021). Dukungan sosial teman sebaya dan masalah kesehatan jiwa pada remaja. Jurnal Ilmu Keperawatan Jiwa, 4(1), 175–184.

Sapolsky, R. M. (2005). The influence of social hierarchy on primate health. Science, 308(5722), 648–652.

Schmitt‐Beck, R. (2015). Bandwagon effect. The International Encyclopedia of Political Communication, 1–5.

Sijtsema, J. J., & Lindenberg, S. M. (2018). Peer influence in the development of adolescent antisocial behavior: Advances from dynamic social network studies. Developmental Review, 50, 140–154.

Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (2003). Penelitian Kualitatif. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Turner, J. C., Oakes, P. J., Haslam, S. A., & McGarty, C. (1994). Self and collective: Cognition and social context. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 20(5), 454–463.

Van de Groep, S., Zanolie, K., Green, K. H., Sweijen, S. W., & Crone, E. A. (2020). A daily diary study on adolescents’ mood, empathy, and prosocial behavior during the COVID-19 pandemic. PloS One, 15(10), e0240349.

Wang, S., Chu, T. H., & Huang, G. (2023). Do Bandwagon Cues Affect Credibility Perceptions? A Meta-Analysis of the Experimental Evidence. Communication Research, 00936502221124395.

Watson, T. (2002). Professions and Professionalism-Should We Jump Off the Bandwagon, Better to Study Where It Is Going? International Studies of Management & Organization, 32(2), 93–105.

Wijayanti, R., Sunarti, E., & Krisnatuti, D. (2020). Peran dukungan sosial dan interaksi ibu-anak dalam meningkatkan kesejahteraan subjektif remaja pada keluarga orang tua bekerja. Jurnal Ilmu Keluarga & Konsumen, 13(2), 125–136.


Article Metrics

 Abstract Views : 614 times
 PDF Downloaded : 0 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.