The improvement students learning achievement by applying work based learning combined with teaching factory concept

  • Hasan Maksum 
    Universitas Negeri Padang
    Indonesia
    https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1321-8888
  • Wawan Purwanto
    Universitas Negeri Padang
    Indonesia
  • Toto Sugiarto
    Universitas Negeri Padang
    Indonesia
  • Nuzul Hidayat
    Universitas Negeri Padang
    Indonesia
  • Siman Siman
    Universitas Negeri Medan
    Indonesia
  • Hanapi Hasan
    Universitas Negeri Medan
    Indonesia

Abstract

The preliminary analysis results indicate that the quality of automotive vocational learning is not optimal. This study aims to develop a work-based learning model that incorporates the Teaching Factory concept (WBL-TEFA) with the goal of enhancing the learning achievement of automotive vocational students. Research and Development (R&D) with the 4D model were implemented in this study. The results indicate that the WBL-TEFA learning model introduced novel elements to the model syntax through the following activity steps: (1) initiation, (2) receiving orders, (3) gathering necessary information, (4) generating and sorting possible solutions, (5) executing orders, (6) quality control, and (7) assessment. To implement this syntax, various supporting materials were developed, including model handbooks, lecturer and student manuals, and textbooks. Following the implementation, the experimental class demonstrated a significantly higher learning achievement gain score of 51.62 compared to the control class, which achieved a gain score of 42.52. Additionally, there was an improvement in task management abilities, work environment skills, interpersonal skills, workplace learning skills, and student critical thinking. In summary, the utilization of the WBL-TEFA learning model proved effective in enhancing students' academic performance, as evidenced by a statistically significant.
Keywords
  • Work-based Learning Model Teaching Factory Automotive Vocational Students Validity
  • Practicality
  • Effectivity
References
  1. Baijnath, N., Motala, S., & Menon, K. (2023). Implications of the Fourth Industrial Revolution in the vortex of higher education in South Africa. In R. J. Tierney, F. Rizvi, & K. Ercikan (Eds.), International Encyclopedia of Education (Fourth Edition) (Fourth Edi, pp. 279–286). Elsevier. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-818630-5.02148-5
  2. Baker, S. D., Peach, N., & Cathcart, M. (2017). Work-based learning: A learning strategy in support of the Australian Qualifications Framework. Journal of Work-Applied Management, 9(1), 70–82. https://doi.org/10.1108/JWAM-04-2017-0008
  3. Bayerlein, L. (2023). The future of internships and workplace-based learning. In R. J. Tierney, F. Rizvi, & K. Ercikan (Eds.), International Encyclopedia of Education (Fourth Edition) (Fourth Edi, pp. 462–468). Elsevier. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-818630-5.02101-1
  4. Chryssolouris, G., Mavrikios, D., & Rentzos, L. (2016). The Teaching Factory: A Manufacturing Education Paradigm. Procedia CIRP, 57, 44–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2016.11.009
  5. Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2018). Research Methods in Education. Eigth Edition. In Routledge Taylor & Francis Group, London and New York (p. 945).
  6. Creswell, J. W., Piano, C., & Vicki, L. (2007). Designing and Conduction Mixed Methods Research (Third Edition). In Los Angeles: USAGE.
  7. Dierdorff, E. C., Rubin, R. S., & Ellington, J. K. (2021). Interpersonal skills, role cognitions, and OCB: Exploring mediating mechanisms and contextual constraints on role enactment. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 129(August 2020), 103604. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2021.103604
  8. Gall, M. D., Gall, J. P., & Borg, W. R. (2007). Educati on al Research : An Introduction ( 8. utg.). In AE Burvikovs, Red.) USA: Pearson. (pp. 8–9).
  9. Guile, D. (2019). The concept of “recontextualization”: implications for professional, vocational and workplace learning. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 23(August), 100343. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lcsi.2019.100343
  10. Himmetoglu, B., Aydug, D., & Bayrak, C. (2021). Education 4.0: Defining The Teacher, The Student, And The School Manager Aspects Of The Revolution. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 21(July), 12–28. https://doi.org/10.17718/TOJDE.770896
  11. Huang, X., & Wang, C. (2021). Factors affecting teachers’ informal workplace learning: The effects of school climate and psychological capital. Teaching and Teacher Education, 103, 103363. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2021.103363
  12. Imants, J., & van Veen, K. (2022). Teacher learning as workplace learning. International Encyclopedia of Education: Fourth Edition, 562–569. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-818630-5.04069-0
  13. Jackson, D., Shan, H., & Meek, S. (2022). Employer development of professional capabilities among early career workers and implications for the design of work-based learning. International Journal of Management Education, 20(3), 100692. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2022.100692
  14. Jakobsone, A., Motejlek, J., & Cakula, S. (2014). Customized work based learning support system for less academically prepared adults in online environment. IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference, EDUCON, October 2019, 523–528. https://doi.org/10.1109/EDUCON.2014.6826142
  15. Jones, J., & Jones, J. (2018). The fourth industrial revolution: the implications of technologicical Disruption for Australia VET. In National Centre for Vocational Education Research (Issue December, p. 57).
  16. Joyce, B., Weil, M., & Calhoun, E. (2015). Models of Teaching. Ninth Edition. In Pearson Education, Inc, United States of America (p. 382).
  17. Karre, H., Hammer, M., & Ramsauer, C. (2019). Building capabilities for agility in a learning factory setting. Procedia Manufacturing, 31, 60–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2019.03.010
  18. Keator, C. S. . (2020). The Digital Era of Learning: Novel Educational Strategies and Challenges For Teaching Students in The 21st Century. In Nova Science Publishers, Inc., New York (p. 330).
  19. Khattree, R. & Naik, D. . (1999). Applied Multivariate Statistics with SAS software, Second Edition. In Computers & Mathematics with Applications (Vol. 38, Issues 5–6). https://doi.org/10.1016/s0898-1221(99)90157-8
  20. Maksum, H., & Purwanto, W. (2019). Model Pembelajaran Pendidikan Vokasi Otomotif (PVO). In UNP Press.
  21. Maksum, H., Yuvenda, D., & Purwanto, W. (2022). Improvement of Metacognitive and Critical Thinking Skills through Development of the a ‘Teaching Factory Based on Troubleshooting’’ (TEFA-T) Model in Automotive Vocational Learning.’ Journal of Turkish Science Education, 19(3), 1015–1036. https://doi.org/10.36681/tused.2022.161
  22. Mavrikios, D., Georgoulias, K., & Chryssolouris, G. (2018). The Teaching Factory Paradigm: Developments and Outlook. Procedia Manufacturing, 23(2017), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2018.04.029
  23. Moldovan, L. (2019). Review of Legislation Framework in the Field of Work-based Learning. Procedia Manufacturing, 32, 302–308. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2019.02.218
  24. Morineau, T., Chapelain, P., & Quinio, P. (2016). Task management skills and their deficiencies during care delivery in simulated medical emergency situation: A classification. Intensive and Critical Care Nursing, 34, 42–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iccn.2015.11.001
  25. Mourtzis, D., Panopoulos, N., Angelopoulos, J., Zygomalas, S., Dimitrakopoulos, G., & Stavropoulos, P. (2021). A Hybrid Teaching Factory Model for Supporting the Educational Process in COVID-19 era. Procedia CIRP, 104(March), 1626–1631. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2021.11.274
  26. Mourtzis, D., Vlachou, E., Dimitrakopoulos, G., & Zogopoulos, V. (2018). Cyber- Physical Systems and Education 4.0 -The Teaching Factory 4.0 Concept. Procedia Manufacturing, 23(2017), 129–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2018.04.005
  27. Rahdiyanta, D., Nurhadiyanto, D., & Munadi, S. (2019). The effects of situational factors in the implementation of work-based learning model on vocational education in Indonesia. International Journal of Instruction, 12(3), 307–324. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2019.12319a
  28. Ross, J. A. (2006). The reliability, validity, and utility of self-assessment. Practical Assessment, Research and Evaluation, 11(10).
  29. Rossi, V. (2023). Inclusive Learning Design in Higher Education; A Practical Guide to Creating Equitable Learning Experiences. 1–7.
  30. S.Meyers, G. &, & Guarino. (2006). Applied Multivariate Research. SAGE Publications, 722.
  31. Sewasew, D., & Koester, L. S. (2019). The developmental dynamics of students’ reading self-concept and reading competence: Examining reciprocal relations and ethnic-background patterns. Learning and Individual Differences, 73(May), 102–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2019.05.010
  32. Shvetsova, О.А. & Kuzmina, A. . (2018). Development of Engineering Personnel in the Era of the Fourth Industrial Revolution. 2018 Third International Conference on Human Factors in Complex Technical Systems and Environments (ERGO)s and Environments (ERGO). St. Petersburg, Russia. doi: 10.1109/ERGO.2018.8443927
  33. Stevens, J. P. (2009). Applied Multivariate Statistics for the Social Sciences. Routledge. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=QMGjsqLQlmUC
  34. Treviño-Elizondo, B. L., & García-Reyes, H. (2022). What does Industry 4.0 mean to Industrial Engineering Education? Procedia Computer Science, 217(2022), 876–885. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2022.12.284
  35. Tushar, H., & Sooraksa, N. (2023). Global employability skills in the 21st century workplace: A semi-systematic literature review. Heliyon, 9(11), e21023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e21023
  36. Welsh, D., Mezhuyev, V., & Irsa, W. (2020). Interdisciplinary terminology framework for teaching and research in learning factories. Procedia Manufacturing, 45, 301–306. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2020.04.021
  37. Yulando, S., Sutopo, S., & Franklin Chi, T. (2019). Electronic Module Design and Development: An Interactive Learning. American Journal of Educational Research, 7(10), 694–698. https://doi.org/10.12691/education-7-10-4.

Downloads

PDF

Statistic

Abstract Views
: 413 times
PDF
: 22 times