A systematic literature review of data-driven decision making: professional development program and its impact in enhancing teachers efficacy

Aulia Zahratun Nisa (1), Farida Kurniawati (2),
(1) Universitas Indonesia  Indonesia
(2) Universitas Indonesia  Indonesia

Corresponding Author
Copyright (c) 2024 Aulia Zahratun Nisa, Farida Kurniawati

DOI : https://doi.org/10.29210/1202424879

Full Text:    Language : en

Abstract


This article aims to collect, evaluate, integrate, and present the discussed articles to understand how professional development programs can enhance teachers' efficacy in implementing data-driven decision-making (D3M). Currently, many teachers have not applied D3M in their classrooms, even though D3M can help teachers develop effective teaching methods in class. One reason for this is the lack of teachers' efficacy in applying D3M. Therefore, this article includes several articles focused on professional development programs to improve teachers' efficacy in implementing data-driven decision-making in the classroom. This article uses a systematic literature review, specifically the PRISMA model, to select articles that meet the inclusion criteria based on the aforementioned topic. The findings show that the dimensions of efficacy, namely mastery experience, vicarious experience, verbal persuasion, and physiological and emotional states, are influenced when a program is designed with a focus on the content to be discussed, uses active learning methods, aligns with existing policies, offers sufficient duration, and fosters collective participation. Mastery experience can be enhanced through the content provided, active learning, and the appropriate duration of training. Verbal persuasion can emerge through the active learning process. Meanwhile, vicarious experience can be created through active learning methods, collaborative participation, and long program durations. When these three dimensions are met, individuals' physiological and emotional states will also improve. Learning through active learning and program duration are crucial aspects for enhancing teachers' efficacy after receiving a professional development program. Thus, professional development programs can be an effective way to increase teachers' efficacy in implementing D3M.

Keywords


education; data-based decision making; data-driven decision making; efficacy

References


Abrams, L. M., Varier, D., & Mehdi, T. (2021). The intersection of school context and teachers’ data use practice: Implications for an integrated approach to capacity building. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 69, 100868.

Arriani, F., Agustiawati, A., Rizki, A., Widiyanti, R., Wibowo, S., Herawati, F., & Tulalessy, C. (2021). Panduan pelaksanaan pendidikan inklusif.

Bandura, A. (1997) Self-efficacy: the exercise of control (New York, Freeman)

Baysal, Y. E., & Mutlu, F. (2021). The Effect of Professional Development Programs on Teachers' Self-Efficacy Beliefs in Science Teaching: A Meta-Analysis Study. International Journal of Contemporary Educational Research, 8(4), 1-15.

Bruce, C. D., Esmonde, I., Ross, J., Dookie, L., & Beatty, R. (2010). The effects of sustained classroom-embedded teacher professional learning on teacher efficacy and related student achievement. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26, 1598-1608.

Bümen, N. T. (2009). Possible effects of professional development on Turkish teachers’ self‐efficacy and classroom practice. Professional development in education, 35(2), 261-278.

Budworth, M. H., & Chummar, S. (2018). Feedback for performance development. Handbuch Schlüsselkonzepte im Coaching, 191-199.

Borko, H. (2004). Professional development and teacher learning: Mapping the terrain. Educational researcher, 33(8), 3-15.

Çibukçiu, B., & Shaqiri, A. (2024). The impact of constructivist teaching on class performance among teachers with low self-efficacy. Journal of Educational and Social Research, 14(5), 337. https://doi.org/10.36941/jesr-2024-0142

Darling-Hammond, L., Hyler, M. E., & Gardner, M. (2017). Effective teacher professional development. Learning policy institute.

Desimone, L. M. (2009). Improving impact studies of teachers’ professional development: Toward better conceptualizations and measures. Educational researcher, 38(3), 181-199.

Desimone, L. M., Porter, A. C., Garet, M. S., Yoon, K. S., & Birman, B. F. (2002). Effects of professional development on teachers’ instruction: Results from a three-year longitudinal study. Educational evaluation and policy analysis, 24(2), 81-112.

Dunn, K. E., Airola, D. T., Lo, W. J., & Garrison, M. (2013). What teachers think about what they can do with data: Development and validation of the data driven decision-making efficacy and anxiety inventory. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 38(1), 87-98.

Evert, K., & Stein, K. C. (2022). Teachers’ networked learning communities: Does collective participation matter?. Teaching and Teacher Education: Leadership and Professional Development, 1, 100009.

Fütterer, T., Richter, E., & Richter, D. (2024). Teachers’ engagement in online professional development—The interplay of online professional development quality and teacher motivation. Zeitschrift für Erziehungswissenschaft, 1-30.

Garet, M. S., Heppen, J., Walters, K., Smith, T., & Yang, R. (2016). Does content-focused teacher professional development work? Findings from three Institute of Education Sciences studies. National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Institute of Education Sciences. https://ies. ed. gov/ncee/pubs/20174010/pdf/20174010. pdf.

Harmon, K., Ruth, T., Reiling, B., Conner, N. W., & Stripling, C. T. (2023). Impact of Prolonged Professional Development on Teachers’ Confidence in Using Inquiry-Based Learning in the Classroom. Journal of Human Sciences and Extension, 11(3), 5.

Jiang, Y., Huang, Y., & Li, Q. (2024). Data-driven instructional decision-making: Framework, instrument, and process. World Journal of Educational Research, 11(3). https://doi.org/10.22158/wjer.v11n3p72

Joyce, B. & Showers, B. (1995) Student achievement through staff development: fundamentals of schoolrenewal (2nd edn) (White Plains, NY, Longman)

Kulachit, N., & Nuangchalerm, P. (2022). Self-development of primary school teachers in classroom management through an active learning program.

Lai, M. K., & Schildkamp, K. (2016). In-service teacher professional learning: Use of assessment in data-based decision-making. In Handbook of human and social conditions in assessment (pp. 77-94). Routledge.

Lee, H. J. (2005). Developing a Professional Development Program Model Based on Teachers' Needs. Professional educator, 27, 39-49.

Lester, J. H. (2003). Planning effective secondary professional development programs. American Secondary Education, 49-61.

Mandinach, E. B., & Schildkamp, K. (2021). Misconceptions about data-based decision making in education: An exploration of the literature. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 69, 100842.

Mandinach, E. B., & Gummer, E. S. (2016). What does it mean for teachers to be data literate: Laying out the skills, knowledge, and dispositions. Teaching and Teacher Education, 60, 366–376.

Nnorom, J. N., Egwunyenga, E. J., & Anho, J. E. (2023). Use of Data-Driven Decision Making in Principal Leadership and School Improvement Initiatives in Delta State Mission Schools. International Journal of Education, Learning and Development, 11(7), 65-79.

Nurzen, S. M. (2022). Data-based decision making for education planning: strategies for principal success.

Oktay, Ö., & Eryılmaz, A. (2020). Investigating the Impact of Long-term Professional Development through Teacher Evaluation. Journal of Education and Future, (18), 83-94.

Parsons, L. (2022, August 23). Why is professional development important? - professional & executive development: Harvard DCE. Professional & Executive Development | Harvard DCE. https://professional.dce.harvard.edu/blog/why-is-professional-development-important/

Pati, D., & Lorusso, L. N. (2018). How to write a systematic review of the literature. HERD: Health Environments Research & Design Journal, 11(1), 15-30.

Provost, F., & Fawcett, T. (2013). Data science and its relationship to big data and data-driven decision making. Big data, 1(1), 51-59.

Reeves, T. D., & Honig, S. L. (2015). A classroom data literacy intervention for pre-service teachers. Teaching and Teacher Education, 50, 90-101.

Reeves, T. D., & Chiang, J. L. (2017). Building pre-service teacher capacity to use external assessment data: An intervention study. The Teacher Educator, 52(2), 155-172.

Reeves, T. D., & Chiang, J. L. (2018). Online interventions to promote teacher data-driven decision making: Optimizing design to maximize impact. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 59, 256-269.

Reeves, T. D., & Chiang, J. L. (2019). Effects of an asynchronous online data literacy intervention on pre-service and in-service educators’ beliefs, self-efficacy, and practices. Computers & Education, 136, 13-33.

Ross, L., Mayled, L. H., Krause, S. J., Judson, E., Middleton, J. A., Culbertson, R. J., ... & Hoyt, S. (2019, June). Board 133: Scaling and Assessment of an Evidence-Based Faculty Development Program for Promoting Active Learning Pedagogical Strategies. In 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition.

Schildkamp, K. (2019). Data-based decision-making for school improvement: Research insights and gaps. Educational research, 61(3), 257-273.

Shields, P. M., Marsh, J. A., & Adelman, N. E. (1998). Evaluation of NSF's Statewide Systemic Initiatives (SSI) program: The SSIs' impacts on classroom practice. Menlo Park, CA: SRI.

Tschannen-Moran, M., Woolfolk Hoy, A., & Hoy, W. K. (1998). Teacher efficacy: Its meaning and measure. Review of Educational Research, 68(2), 202e248. http://dx.doi.org/10.3102/00346543068002202.

Tschannen-Moran, M., & McMaster, P. (2009). Sources of self-efficacy: Four professional development formats and their relationship to self-efficacy and implementation of a new teaching strategy. The elementary school journal, 110(2), 228-245.

Van der Scheer, E. A., & Visscher, A. J. (2016). Effects of an intensive data-based decision making intervention on teacher efficacy. Teaching and Teacher Education, 60, 34-43.

Wang, L. Y., Jen-Yi, L., Tan, L. S., Tan, I., Lim, X. F., & Wu, B. S. (2016). Unpacking high and low efficacy teachers’ task analysis and competence assessment in teaching low-achieving students in secondary schools. The Australian Educational Researcher, 43, 165-183.

Wurster, S., Bez, S., & Merk, S. (2023). Does learning how to use data mean being motivated to use it? Effects of a data use intervention on data literacy and motivational beliefs of pre-service teachers. Learning and Instruction, 88, 101806.

Yan, Z., & Cheng, E. C. K. (2015). Primary teachers' attitudes, intentions and practices regarding formative assessment. Teaching and Teacher Education, 45, 128-136.

Yoo, J. H. (2016). The effect of professional development on teacher efficacy and teachers’ self-analysis of their efficacy change. Journal of Teacher Education for Sustainability, 18(1), 84-94.


Article Metrics

 Abstract Views : 355 times
 PDF Downloaded : 0 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.