1. Home
  2. Vol 10, No 2 (2024)
  3. Jannah

Analysis of the surplus value of driving schools in jember regency in 2024

Tutik Waridatul Jannah (1), Sukidin Sukidin (2), Retna Ngesti Sedyati (3),
(1) Universitas Jember  Indonesia
(2) Universitas Jember  Indonesia
(3) Universitas Jember  Indonesia

Corresponding Author
Copyright (c) 2025 Tutik Waridatul Jannah

DOI : https://doi.org/10.29210/1202425141

Full Text:    Language : en

Abstract


This study aims to analyze the application of the concept of surplus value in driving schools and explore its impact on the quality of education. this research was conducted based on the need to understand how government interventions can overcome the mismatch of measurable improvement in the quality of education. although previous research related to a structured framework but there are still few studies that discuss it. This study examines how driving schools implement the commitment of the Driving School Program (PSP) to achieve surplus value in the form of 5 interventions from the government. The research uses a qualitative descriptive approach, There are 5 driving schools that are used as case studies in providing in-depth insights. Data collection using in-depth interviews, participatory observations, focus group discussions (FGD) and analysis of modified documents. The respondents were 5 principals of the driving schools and the learning committee as the main respondents, the Coaching Supervisor and other teachers from the 5 driving schools, which was carried out from January to December 2024. this research uses descriptive qualitative research. The data was analyzed using identification, classification and interpretation of the data from the research results. The results were obtained that the achievement of surplus value 3 among 5 driving schools in the range of 51 – 75 or the Developing According to Expectations (BSH) criterion means that the understanding, implementation and commitment of the driving schools have been carried out according to the existing schedule/mentoring timeline, have been consistently implemented, but have not been scanned. In addition, this study also contributed to the improvement of teaching and student engagement of the 5 schools that had performance differences with a surplus value of 3.

Keywords


Education

References


Abadi, T. W., & Ivoniasari, O. (2024). TikTok Live Streaming as a Digital Marketing Communication Media. The Journal of Society and Media, 8(2), 394-423.

Agirdag, O., & Muijs, D. (2023). School leadership development and academic achievement: Effectiveness of the High Performing Schools programme. International Journal of Educational Research, 122, 102248.

Azorín, C., & Fullan, M. (2022). Leading new, deeper forms of collaborative cultures: Questions and pathways. Journal of Educational Change, 23(1), 131-143.

Barrett, P., Treves, A., Shmis, T., & Ambasz, D. (2019). The impact of school infrastructure on learning: A synthesis of the evidence.

Biggs, J., Tang, C., & Kennedy, G. (2022). Teaching for quality learning at university 5e: McGraw-hill education (UK).

Gaussel, M., MacGregor, S., Brown, C., & Piedfer-Quêney, L. (2021). Climates of trust, innovation, and research use in fostering evidence-informed practice in French schools. International Journal of Educational Research, 109, 101810.

Harapan, E., Aprina, T., & Effendi, D. (2024). Principals' Strategies To Improve The Quality Of Education: A Qualitative Research At SMA Negeri 1 West Pemulutan. International Journal of Education, Vocational and Social Science, 3(01), 107-125.

Karo, J. T. K., Mudjisusatyo, Y., & Pangaribuan, W. (2024). ANALISIS KEBIJAKAN SEKOLAH PENGGERAK. Esensi Pendidikan Inspiratif, 6(2).

Kohn Rådberg, K., Lundqvist, U., Malmqvist, J., & Hagvall Svensson, O. (2020). From CDIO to challenge-based learning experiences–expanding student learning as well as societal impact? European Journal of Engineering Education, 45(1), 22-37.

Lakkala, S., Galkienė, A., Navaitienė, J., Cierpiałowska, T., Tomecek, S., & Uusiautti, S. (2021). Teachers supporting students in collaborative ways—An analysis of collaborative work creating supportive learning environments for every student in a school: Cases from Austria, Finland, Lithuania, and Poland. Sustainability, 13(5), 2804.

Liang, X., Kidwai, H., Zhang, M., & Zhang, Y. (2016). How Shanghai does it: Insights and lessons from the highest-ranking education system in the world: World Bank Publications.

Lomos, C., Luyten, J., & Tieck, S. (2023). Implementing ICT in classroom practice: what else matters besides the ICT infrastructure? Large-Scale Assessments in Education, 11(1), 1.

Madani, R. A. (2019). Analysis of educational quality, a goal of education for all policy. Higher Education Studies, 9(1), 100-109.

Marx, K. (2020). Theories of Surplus Value: Volume 1 (Vol. 20): Pattern Books.

Maziriri, E. T., Nyagadza, B., & Chuchu, T. (2024). Innovation conviction, innovation mindset and innovation creed as precursors for the need for achievement and women's entrepreneurial success in South Africa: entrepreneurial education as a moderator. European Journal of Innovation Management, 27(4), 1225-1248.

Meyer, R. H. (1997). Value-added indicators of school performance: A primer. Economics of education Review, 16(3), 283-301.

Nudurupati, S. S., Tebboune, S., Garengo, P., Daley, R., & Hardman, J. (2024). Performance measurement in data intensive organisations: resources and capabilities for decision-making process. Production Planning & Control, 35(4), 373-393.

Patilima, S. (2022). Sekolah Penggerak sebagai upaya peningkatan kualitas pendidikan. Paper presented at the Prosiding Seminar Nasional Pendidikan Dasar.

Pedro, E. d. M., Leitão, J., & Alves, H. (2020). Stakeholders’ perceptions of sustainable development of higher education institutions: An intellectual capital approach. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 21(5), 911-942.

Putri, C. A. (2017). Managerial School Principals in Improving the Quality of Education Through the Driving School Program. Tekno-Pedagogi: Jurnal Teknologi Pendidikan, 7(1), 10-19.

Rasmitadila, R., Aliyyah, R. R., Rachmadtullah, R., Samsudin, A., Syaodih, E., Nurtanto, M., & Tambunan, A. R. S. (2020). The perceptions of primary school teachers of online learning during the COVID-19 pandemic period. Journal of Ethnic and Cultural Studies, 7(2), 90-109.

Sauchelli, I., Heath, G., Richardson, A., Lewis, S., & Lim, L.-A. (2024). You've got mail: A technology-mediated feedback strategy to support self-regulated learning in first-year university students. Student Success, 15(1), 11-21.

Thompson, A., Lenzi, L., Machin, M., Satherley, A., Bartlett, M., & Dawson, M. (2023). Digital and data driven technologies: considerations for developers.

Uli, L. (2022). The Concept of Deprivation by the State of Evidence of Objects of Collateral in Corruption Crimes. Paper presented at the Proceeding International Conference on Law, Economy, Social and Sharia (ICLESS).

Yuan, Y.-H., Liu, C.-H., & Kuang, S.-S. (2021). An innovative and interactive teaching model for cultivating talent’s digital literacy in decision making, sustainability, and computational thinking. Sustainability, 13(9), 5117.


Article Metrics

 Abstract Views : 105 times
 PDF Downloaded : 0 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.