How do the supervisors of guidance and counseling fare in terms of accountability and performance?

August 10, 2022
Abstract Views: 239
Downloads: 0
Page: 28-32

Rima Pratiwi Fadli Institut Agama Islam Sumatera Barat, Indonesia
Neviyarni Neviyarni Universitas Negeri Padang, Indonesia
Riska Ahmad Universitas Negeri Padang, Indonesia

Corresponding Author

DOI:

Keywords:

Accountability in Counseling, Supervisor, School Counselor Performance, Guidance and counseling

Abstract

Counselors, who are trained professionals, guide counselees through the process of guidance. School counselors conduct assessments as part of their services. Without an assessment, it would be impossible for us to determine whether the intended guidance program had been implemented successfully. The evaluation of the guidance program is to determine the degree to which the program's implementation has met its stated objectives. In other words, the outcome of the assessment activities will determine whether the program is successful in reaching its objectives. It cannot be isolated from the supervision actions, according to the assessment that was done. Counseling and direction School supervisors are school supervisors with complete rights, powers, and responsibilities for evaluating, promoting, and implementing education in various schools through guidance and counseling activities. Additionally, the adequacy of the services rendered by the BK teacher/counselor is determined by the factors mentioned above. This indicates that the school counselor can account for the services rendered.

Full Text:

PDF

References

Anak, A. K. (1995). Psikologi Perkembangan. Bandung: Mandar Maju.

Azizah, F., Ginting, F. B., & Utami, R. S. (2017). Evaluasi Pelaksanaan Program Layanan Bimbingan Dan Konseling Di Sekolah. Paper presented at the Prosiding Seminar Bimbingan dan Konseling.

Bhakti, C. P. (2017). Program Bimbingan dan Konseling Komprehensif untuk Mengembangkan Standar Kompetensi Siswa. Jurnal Konseling Andi Matappa, 1(2), 131-132.

Carino, L. V. (1991). Accountability. Corruption and Democracy: A Clarification of Concepts,(in the Asian Review of Public Administration. Journal of Accounting, Vol. III. No. 2.

Depdiknas. (2009). Bahan Belajar Mandiri Kelompok Kerja Pengawas Sekolah Dimensi Kompetensi Supervisi Manajerial. Jakarta: Dirjen PMPTK.

Dinartiwi, A. (2010). Persepsi siswa tenyang layanan bimbingan dan konseling di SMK Grafisika Yayasan Lektur Jakarta Selatan.

Fathurrohman, P. (2014). Urgensi Bimbingan dan Konseling di Perguruan Tinggi Merajut Asa Fungsi dan Dimensi Dosen Sebagai Konselor. Bandung: Refika Aditama.

Ghartey, J. (1993). Education, accountability and development in the third world. Research in Third World Accounting, 2, 169-186.

Guru, D. J., & Kependidikan, T. (2016). Panduan Operasional Penyelenggaraan Bimbingan dan Konseling Sekolah Menengah Kejuruan SMK: Jakarta: Kemendikbud.

Kamaluddin, H. (2011). Bimbingan dan konseling sekolah. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan, 17(4), 447-454.

Kartadinata, S. (2005). Arah dan Tantangan Bimbingan dan Konseling Profesional: Proposisi Historik-Futuristik. Paper presented at the Seminar Nasional: Perspektif Baru Profesi Bimbingan dan Konseling di Era Globalisasi. Bandung.

Krumboltz, J. D. (1974). An accountability model for counselors. Journal of Counseling & Development, 52(10), 639-646.

Luddin, A. B. M. (2010). Dasar Dasar Konseling: Perdana Publishing.

PERTAMA, S. M. (2006). Model Kurikulum Tingkat Satuan Pendidikan.

Prayitno. (2009). Arah Kinerja Profesional Konseling Sekolah. Padang: FIP UNP.

Robert, G. L., & Marianne, M. H. (2003). Introduction to counseling and guidance. New York: Pearson education, Inc.

Romlah, S. (2009). Analysis on the problems faced by English teachers in teaching speaking:(a case study at second grade Islamic Junior High School of Ruhama).

Schmidt, J. J. (2003). Counseling in schools: Essential services and comprehensive programs: Allyn & Bacon.

Suharto, E. (2006). Akuntabilitas Pendidikan dan Pelatihan Kesejahteraan Sosial. Jakarta TKSM.