Assesing community readiness for smart city development in sragen using POER framework

  • Merlin Swantamalo Magna 
    Universitas Sebelas Maret
    Indonesia
  • Ulfah Sulistyowati
    Universitas Sebelas Maret
    Indonesia

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the level of readiness of the people of Sragen Regency in supporting the implementation of Smart City through the use of Disdukcapil digital services using the Perceived Organizational E-Readiness (POER) framework. The study uses a descriptive quantitative approach through a survey of 100 respondents who are users of Disdukcapil services, with the sample determined using the Cochran formula because the population size is unknown. Data were collected through a valid and reliable Likert scale questionnaire, then analyzed descriptively and using simple inferential statistics. The results show that community readiness is in the middle category with disparities between dimensions, where Awareness and Business Resources are fairly ready, while Human Resources are still not ready. The low Human Resources dimension is reinforced by the high percentage of technical constraints and low problem-solving skills. These findings indicate to have that community readiness has not progressed evenly and remains relatively passive. Consequently, the success of Sragen Smart City requires to have a strategy that not only focuses to have on strengthening technological aspects but also emphasizes to have the continuous enhancement of community capacity and digital literacy to realize to have an inclusive and participatory Smart Society.

Keywords
  • Sragen Regency
  • POER
  • Smart City
  • Community Readiness Level
Lisensing Information
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

References
  1. Afriani, L., Wahyudin, Y., & Perdana, R. (2022). The Development of Smart Cities Environment- Related Domain: A Case Study in In Indonesia and France. PLANNING MALAYSIA, 20. https://doi.org/10.21837/pm.v20i20.1084
  2. Ahvenniemi, H., Huovila, A., Pinto-Seppä, I., & Airaksinen, M. (2017). What are the differences between sustainable and smart cities? Cities, 60, 234–245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2016.09.009
  3. Andreani, S., Kalchschmidt, M., Pinto, R., & Sayegh, A. (2019). Reframing technologically enhanced urban scenarios: A design research model towards human centered smart cities. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 142, 15–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2018.09.028
  4. Aprilia, N., Setiani, Y., & Hadi FS, C. A. (2023). Pengembangan Instrumen Tes Numerasi Pada Asesmen Kompetensi Minimum Yang Bernilai Budaya Lokal. Jurnal Educatio FKIP UNMA, 9(2), 850–857. https://doi.org/10.31949/educatio.v9i2.4824
  5. Arafah, Y., & Winarso, H. (2020). Peningkatan dan Penguatan Partisipasi Masyarakat dalam Konteks Smart City. TATALOKA, 22(1), 27–40. https://doi.org/10.14710/tataloka.22.1.27-40
  6. Atoasi, S. (2018). ANALISIS PENERAPAN SMART CITY DAN INTERNET OF THINGS (IOT) DI INDONESIA. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/328955296
  7. Caragliu, A., Del Bo, C., & Nijkamp, P. (2011). Smart Cities in Europe. Journal of Urban Technology, 18(2), 65–82. https://doi.org/10.1080/10630732.2011.601117
  8. Cohen, B., & Read, M. (2014). METHODOLOGY FOR 2014 SMART CITIES BENCHMARKING. Retrieved from https://www.fastcompany.com/3038818/the-smartest-cities-in-the-world-2015-methodology[20.
  9. Dada, D. (2006). E-Readiness for Developing Countries: Moving the focus from the environment to the users. Electronic Journal of Information Systems in Developing Countries, 27(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1681-4835.2006.tb00183.x
  10. Dameri, R. P. (2014). Comparing Smart and Digital City: Initiatives and Strategies in Amsterdam and Genoa. Are They Digital and/or Smart? https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-06160-3_3
  11. Darmawan, A. D. (2022). Elemen kunci pendorong partisipasi masyarakat sebagai fondasi kebijakan Smart City: Suatu kajian pustaka sistematis. Jurnal Kependudukan Indonesia, 17(1), 105. https://doi.org/10.14203/jki.v17i1.714
  12. Erlita, S. (2020). Hubungan Komunikasi Interpersonal dan Motivasi Berafiliasi Dengan Intensi Prososial Kelas XI SMU. Jurnal RAP (Riset Aktual Psikologi Universitas Negeri Padang), 11(1), 65. https://doi.org/10.24036/rapun.v11i1.108524
  13. Febriani, R., Luthfi, Z. F., & Waldi, A. (2024). Participation of Citizen as Social Capital in LAPOR! Application in Indonesia. JOIV : International Journal on Informatics Visualization, 8(3), 1185. https://doi.org/10.62527/joiv.8.3.2239
  14. Firman, Idrus, I. A., & Rahmawati, R. (2024). Public Participation in Rapid Response Services for the Sustainability of Jakarta Smart City. Hrvatska i Komparativna Javna Uprava, 24(3), 423–446. https://doi.org/10.31297/hkju.24.3.4
  15. Fraenkel, J. R., Wallen, N. E., & Hyun, H. H. (2012). How to desIgn and evaluate research In educatIon (8th ed.). New York: Mc Graw Hill.
  16. Golafshani, N. (2015). Understanding Reliability and Validity in Qualitative Research. The Qualitative Report. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2003.1870
  17. Gula, L. P. (2022). A Phenomenological Study Of Lived Experiences Of Parents At A Young Age. Research and Development Journal of Education, 8(2), 462. https://doi.org/10.30998/rdje.v8i2.12841
  18. Herdiyanti, A., Hapsari, P. S., & Susanto, T. D. (2019). Modelling the Smart Governance Performance to Support Smart City Program in Indonesia. Procedia Computer Science, 161, 367–377. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2019.11.135
  19. Hollands, R. G. (2008). Will The Real Smart City Please Stand Up? City, 12(3), 303–320. https://doi.org/10.1080/13604810802479126
  20. Husnah, F. (2022). Analisis Penggunaan Internet Dalam Pembelajaran Sains Dikelas Xii Sma Negeri 1 Tualang Riau (Vol. 4).
  21. Mohamad, A. K. (2021). Disrupsi Teknologi Pada Konsep Smart City: Analisa Smart Society dengan Konstruksi Konsep Society 5.0. Jurnal Arsitektur Archicentre Universitas Faletehan, 103–110.
  22. Molla, A., & Licker, P. S. (2005). Perceived E-Readiness Factors in E-Commerce Adoption: An Empirical Investigation in a Developing Country. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 10(1), 83–110. https://doi.org/10.1080/10864415.2005.11043963
  23. Nesti, G. (2020). Defining and assessing the transformational nature of smart city governance: insights from four European cases. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 86(1), 20–37. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852318757063
  24. Nurmandi, A. (2006). Manajemen Perkotaan, Aktor, Organisasi, Pengelolaan Daerah Perkotaan dan Metropolitan di Indonesia. Yogyakarta: Sinergi Publishing.
  25. PPID Sragen. (2019). Bupati Sragen Buka Bimtek Sragen Smart City Tahap I. Sragen. Retrieved from https://ppid.sragenkab.go.id/v2/berita/bupati-sragen-buka-bimtek-sragen-smart-city-tahap-i.html
  26. Prabowo, O. M., Supangkat, S. H., & Mulyana, E. (2021). Anomaly Detection Techniques in Smart City: A Review from a Framework Perspective. 2021 International Conference on ICT for Smart Society (ICISS), 1–6. IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICISS53185.2021.9533252
  27. Putra, R. P., Hidayati, A. N., & Soewarni, I. (2021). STRATEGI PEMBANGUNAN PERKOTAAN BERKELANJUTAN DI KOTA BATU. Jurnal Inovasi Penelitian, 1(9), 1805–1824.
  28. Rizkinaswara, L. (2018). Gerakan Menuju 100 Smart City. Retrieved from https://aptika.kominfo.go.id/2018/11/gerakan-menuju-100-smart-city/
  29. Simonofski, A., Vallé, T., Serral, E., & Wautelet, Y. (2021). Investigating context factors in citizen participation strategies: A comparative analysis of Swedish and Belgian smart cities. International Journal of Information Management, 56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.09.007
  30. Sugiyono. (2021). Statistika Untuk Penelitian (31st ed.). Bandung: Alfabeta.
  31. Šulyová, D., & Kubina, M. (2022). Sustainable Development of Smart City Concept Linked to Limited Resources Abroad and in Slovakia. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 1077(1). Institute of Physics. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/1077/1/012001
  32. Supangkat, H. S. (2018). SMART PROVINCE . Smart City & Community Innovation Center (SCCiC). Bandung.
  33. Tampubolon, B. D., Budi Mulyono, A., Isharyadi, F., Ayuningtyas, U., & A Kasman, S. (2022). Implementation of Smart City Standards in Indonesia based on SNI ISO 37122 during the COVID-19 Pandemic APEC Sub-Committee on Standards and Conformance.
  34. Tim, G. (2019). 7 Kota di Indonesia yang Mengaplikasikan Program Smart City. Retrieved from https://Blog.Gamatechno.com
  35. Widodo, A., & Permatasari, D. A. (2020). Strategi Komunikasi dalam Program Bekasi Smart City. ETTISAL : Journal of Communication, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.21111/ejoc.v5i1.3454

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.

Downloads

PDF

Statistic

Abstract Views
: 155 times
PDF
: 53 times