Validitas instrumen tes keterampilan berpikir kritis pada materi virus di fase E SMA/MA

Alifda Putri Meivinia; Ardi Ardi; Zulyusri Zulyusri; Helsa Helsa

doi:10.29210/30033074000

Validitas instrumen tes keterampilan berpikir kritis pada materi virus di fase E SMA/MA

Alifda Putri Meivinia

⁽¹⁾, Ardi Ardi ⁽²⁾, Zulyusri Zulyusri ⁽³⁾, Helsa Helsa ⁽⁴⁾,
(1) Universitas Negeri Padang

Indonesia
(2) Universitas Negeri Padang

Indonesia
(3) Universitas Negeri Padang

Indonesia
(4) Universitas Negeri Padang

Indonesia

Corresponding Author
Copyright (c) 2023 Alifda Putri Meivinia

DOI : https://doi.org/10.29210/30033074000

Full Text:

Language : id

Abstract

Validity is the extent to which a test can reliably measure the intended construct. This research aims to describing critical thinking skills test instruments on virus material. The data collection technique used is descriptive statistical analysis. Data analysis used the Gregory test content validation technique. The validation results in Table 1 show that the total score of validator 1 is 50 and the score of validator 2 is 54. With a total score of 52. So the average score of validator 1 is 3.33 and validator 2 is 3.6. The Knowledge, Language and Construct Aspects in the expert validity questionnaire show that the 50 items as a whole are categorized as quite relevant with an average score of 3.46. It can be concluded that the item instrument on virus material has very high validity based on the Gregory Test with a score of 0.8 – 1 = Very high validity.

Keywords: Validity, Critical Thinking, Virus, Descriptive.

References

Ardi, Hervi. F, Mudjiran. (2023). The Validity and Reliability Questionnaire of Students' Critical Thinking Skills in General Biology Course. Journal of Research in Science Education. 9(3) (2023).

Arifin, Z. (2017). Kriteria Instrumen dalam Suatu Penelitian. Jurnal THEOREMS (The Original Research of Mathematics), 2(1): 28–36.

Cottrell, Stella. (2005) .Critical Thinking Skill: Developing Effective Analysis and Argument. New York Palcrave Macmillan.

DeVellis, R. F. (2016). Scale Development: Theory and Applications (4th ed.). Sage Publications.

Ennis, R. H. (2011). The Nature of Critical Thinking: An Outline of Critical Thinking Dispositions and Abilities. (online).(http://faculty.education.illinois.edu/rhennis/documents/TheNat ureofCriticalThinking_51711_000.pdf), diakses tanggal 11 Juli 2023.

Ennis, R.H. (1993). Critical Thinking Assessment. College of Education, 32 (3):179-184.

Facione, P.A. (2013). Critical thinking what it is and Why it Count. Millbrae,CA:Measured Reasons and The California Academic Press.

Gregory, R.J. (2007). Psychological testing: history, principles, and applications. Boston: Pearson.

Hasana, I., Saptasari, M., & Wulandari, N. (2017). Pengembangan Instrumen Penilaian Kemampuan Literasi Sains Siswa Kelas XI Materi Sistem Ekskresi dan Koordinasi di SMAN 9 Malang. Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi, 8(2), 52–56.

Johnson, Eline.( 2007). Contextual Teaching & Learning. Bandung:MLC.

Kemendikbud. (2017). Pendidikan Karakter Dorong Tumbuhnya Kompetensi Siswa Abad 21, www.kemendikbud.go.id.

Lismaya, L. (2019). Berpikir Kritis & PBL (Problem Based Learning). Media Sahabat Cendikia, Surabaya.

Osman, K., Hiong, L. C., & Vebrianto, R. (2013). 21st century biology: anterdiciplinary approach of biology, technology, engineering, and mathematics education. Procedia Social and Behavior Science, 102, 188- 194.

Prihadi,E. (2018). Pengembangan Keterampilan 4c Melalui Metode Poster Comment Pada Mata Pelajaran PAI dan Budi Pekerti (Penelitian di SMA Negeri 26 Bandung). Jurnal Pendidikan Islam Rabbani .Vol. 2 No. 1 Tahun 2018.

Rahman Arief Aulia dan Cut Eva Nasyrah. (2019). Evaluasi Pembelajaran. Jawa Timur: Uwais Inspirasi Indonesia.

Retnawati, H. (2016). Analisis Kuantitatif Instrumen Penelitian. Cet. I. Yogyakarta Parama Publishing, 2016), h.33.

Siyoto, Sandu dan Ali Sodik. (2015). Dasar Metodologi Penelitian. Yogayakrta: Literasi Media Publishing.

Sugiyono. (2011). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan R&D. Bandung: Afabeta.

Trochim, W. M. K., & Donnelly, J. P. (2008). The Research Methods Knowledge Base (3rded.).Atomic Dog Publishing.

Zubaidah, S., Malang, U. N., & Aloysius, D. C. (2015). Asesmen Berpikir Kritis Terintegras Tes Essay Asesmen Berpikir Kritis Terintegrasi Tes Essay. 200–213.