Pengujian validitas konstruk dan relibialitas skala religiusitas pada dewasa awal

  • Julia Eva Putri 
    STKIP Muhammadiyah Sungai Penuh
    Indonesia

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menguji validitas dan reliabilitas instrumen pengukuran religiusitas pada individu dewasa awal. Sampel penelitian terdiri dari 150 partisipan dewasa awal yang dipilih secara purposif di Kabupaten Kerinci-Sungai Penuh. Validitas instrumen diuji melalui analisis faktor eksploratori (EFA), sementara reliabilitas dinilai menggunakan koefisien alpha Cronbach. Hasil analisis menunjukkan bahwa seluruh indikator memiliki nilai factor loading di atas 0,50 dan struktur faktor yang terbentuk sesuai dengan teori, dengan total variance explained sebesar 65%. Nilai koefisien alpha Cronbach sebesar 0,88 mengindikasikan reliabilitas yang tinggi. Dengan demikian, instrumen ini dinyatakan layak untuk digunakan dalam mengukur tingkat religiusitas pada populasi dewasa awal secara akurat dan konsisten.

Lisensing Information
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

References
  1. Ancok, D., & Suroso, N. F. (2005). Psikologi Islami: Solusi Islam atas problem-problem psikologi. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
  2. Arnett, J. J. (2000). Emerging adulthood: A theory of development from the late teens through the twenties. American Psychologist, 55(5), 469–480. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.5.469
  3. Azra, A. (2015). Islam Nusantara: Sejarah, budaya, dan peranannya dalam membentuk karakter bangsa. Jakarta: Kompas Media Nusantara.
  4. Azwar, S. (2015). Reliabilitas dan Validitas (4 ed.). Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
  5. Fabrigar, L. R., Wegener, D. T., MacCallum, R. C., & Strahan, E. J. (1999). Evaluating the use of exploratory factor analysis in psychological research. Psychological Methods, 4(3), 272–299. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.4.3.272
  6. Field, A. (2013). Discovering Statistics Using IBM SPSS Statistics (4th ed.). Sage Publications.
  7. George, D., & Mallery, P. (2003). SPSS for Windows step by step: A simple guide and reference (11.0 update). Allyn & Bacon.
  8. Ghorbani, N., Watson, P. J., & Hood, R. W. (2013). Dimensions of Islamic religious experience: The importance of interpretation. International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 23(1), 41–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508619.2013.735001
  9. Glock, C. Y., & Stark, R. (1965). Religion and Society in Tension. Chicago: Rand McNally.
  10. Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2010). Multivariate data analysis (7th ed.). Pearson Education.
  11. Hamzah, A., Suryani, L., & Nurdin, R. (2018). The Role of Religious Practice in Strengthening Islamic Behavior: A Study of Muslim Communities in Indonesia. Journal of Islamic Studies and Culture, 6(2), 45–52. https://doi.org/10.15640/jisc.v6n2a6
  12. Haque, A. (2004). Psychology from Islamic perspective: Contributions of early Muslim scholars and challenges to contemporary Muslim psychologists. Journal of Religion and Health, 43(4), 357–377. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10943-004-4302-z
  13. Hill, P. C., & Pargament, K. I. (2003). Advances in the conceptualization and measurement of religion and spirituality. American Psychologist, 58(1), 64–74. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.58.1.64
  14. Koenig, H. G. (2009). Research on religion, spirituality, and mental health: A review. The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 54(5), 283–291. https://doi.org/10.1177/070674370905400502
  15. Koenig, L. B., McGue, M., Krueger, R. F., & Bouchard Jr., T. J. (2005). Genetic and environmental influences on religiousness: Findings for retrospective and current religiousness ratings. Journal of Personality, 73(2), 471–488. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.2005.00316.x
  16. Krause, N. (2003). Religious meaning and subjective well-being in late life. Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 58(3), S160–S170.
  17. Mahudin, N. D., Noor, N. M., Dzulkifli, M. A., & Janon, N. S. (2016). Religiosity among Muslims: A scale development and validation study. Makara Human Behavior Studies in Asia, 20(2), 109–120. https://doi.org/10.7454/mssh.v20i2.3492
  18. Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric Theory (3rd ed.). McGraw-Hill.
  19. Religious practices and psychological well-being among university students. Journal of Religion and Health, 61(1), 45–59. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10943-021-01234-1
  20. Santos, E. M., Simões, C., & Diniz, E. (2021). Religiosity and psychological well-being: A study with university students from Brazil and Indonesia. Journal of Religion and Health, 60(4), 2574–2588. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10943-020-01116-2
  21. Saroglou, V. (2011). Believing, bonding, behaving, and belonging: The big four religious dimensions and cultural variation. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 42(8), 1320–1340. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022111412267
  22. Suryadi, B., Hayat, B., & Putra, M. D. K. (2020). Evaluating psychometric properties of the Muslim Daily Religiosity Assessment Scale (MUDRAS) in Indonesian samples using the Rasch model. Mental Health, Religion & Culture, 23(3–4), 331–346. https://doi.org/10.1080/13674676.2020.1795822
  23. Worthington, R. L., & Whittaker, T. A. (2006). Scale development research: A content analysis and recommendations for best practices. The Counseling Psychologist, 34(6), 806–838. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011000006288127
  24. Yong, A. G., & Pearce, S. (2013). A beginner’s guide to factor analysis: Focusing on exploratory factor analysis. Tutorials in Quantitative Methods for Psychology, 9(2), 79–94. https://doi.org/10.20982/tqmp.09.2.p079

Downloads

PDF

Statistic

Abstract Views
: 29 times
PDF
: 32 times