Euphemism patterns in karo language at traditional marriage ceremonies

Bukit Bethesda (1), Erikson Saragih (2), Esra Perangin-angin (3),
(1) Universitas Prima Indonesia, Medan  Indonesia
(2) Universitas Sumatera Utara, Medan  Indonesia
(3) Universitas Prima Indonesia, Medan 

Corresponding Author
Copyright (c) 2023 Misbahul Munir, Cahaya Cahaya, Mulyana Abdullah, Jenuri Jenuri, Abdul Rahim Karim

DOI : https://doi.org/10.29210/1202322885

Full Text:    Language : en

Abstract


The study aims (1) to find out the patterns of euphemism in the Karo language, (2) to describe the eufemism that should be used in conversations at Karo's customary ceremonies, (3) to define the frequency of the themes of euphimism in Karo. This research approach is descriptive research with a qualitative approach. This research is based on social phenomena, i.e. descriptive data of language, analyzed in context and translated into words or sentences. The method used in this study is a descriptive method. This method is used to visualize the euphemism patterns of the Karo language in indigenous ceremonies. The method used in this study is ethnography one of the empirical and theoretical approaches that seeks for in-depth description and cultural analysis based on intensive field research. The results of the study were (1) a pattern of euphemism in the Karo language frequently found in the wedding ceremony in Karo, a marriage known as the “perjabun”,(2) a conversation on the customary ceremony of Karo’s wedding in a conversation, (3) the frequency of the theme of eufemism that exists in the language Karo that the four forms of the ceremony is the introduction of the bride there are two data with a percentage of 50%, whereas the form to the two ceremonies of flour tawar there are seven data with the percentages of 90%, the subsequent ceremony there are three data with 25%, and in the msk nasisn before-face there is one data with 25% percent.

Keywords


Euphemism, Languages, Traditional Ceremonies, Marriage

References


Abdul Khobir, Filsafat Pendidikan Islam Landasan Teoritis dan Praktis (Pekalongan: STAIN Pekalongan Press, 2007). Hal. 25-26.

Albert Sydney Hornby. 2005. Oxford Advanced Learner's Dictionary of Current English, Seventh Edition, (New York: Oxford University Press).

Allan, Keith dan Kate Burridge. 1991. Euphemism & Dysphemism: Language Used as Shield and Weapon. New York: Oxford University Press.

Anderson J. 2015. Mission to the East Coast of Sumatra in 1823, Singapore: Oxford University Press.

Anderson L. W. dan D. R. Krathwohl. 2015. Kerangka Landasan Untuk Pembelajaran, Pengajaran, dan Asesmen Revisi Taksonomi Pendidikan Bloom. Terjemahan: Agung Prihantoro. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Belajar.

Arikunto, S. 2010. Prosedur Penelitian Suatu Pendekatan Praktik. Jakarta: PT Rineka Cipta.

Chaer, Abdul. 1995. Pengantar Semantik Bahasa Indonesia, Jakarta: Gramedia.

Creswell, John W. 2012. Research Design Pendekatan Kualitatif, Kuantitatif, dan Mixed. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Danandjaja, James. 1986. Foklor Indonesia, Iimu Gosip, Dongeng dan lain-lain. Jakarta: Grafiti Press.

Fromkin, Victoria, Rodman, Robert, dan Hyams, Nina. 2011. An Introduction to Language, Ninth Edition. Canada: Wadsworth, Cengage Learning.

Herusatoto, Budiono. 2001. Simbelisme Dalam Budava Jawa. Yogyakarta: Hanindita.

Keraf, Gorys. 2004. Komposisi: Sebuah Pengantar Kemahiran Bahasa. Flores: Nusa Indah.

Koentjaraningrat. 1985. Javanese Culture. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Lubis, M. 2018. Pursuing a Passion for Service and Justice” http:// Life and letters la. utexas. edu/2018/08/pursuing-a-passionfor service-and-justice/, (accessed 17/03/19).

Mahsun. 2007. Metode Penelitian Bahasa. Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo Persada.

Malo, Sanan Shoro. dan Fakhir Omar Mohammed. 2014. “The Use Of Euphemism and Dysphemism

in Bahdeni Dialect.” Journal of University Duhok 17(1):1-14 Nasution. 2003. Metode Penelitian Naturalistik Kualitatif. Bandung: Tarsito.

Sarjani, T, 2008. Dinamika orang karo Budaya dan modernisme. Medan: Abdi Karya.

Singarimbun, M. 2015. Kindship, Descent and Alliance among Karo Batak,

Berkeley: University of California Press.

Singarimbun, Masri & Sofian Effendi. 2008. Merode Penelitian Survei, Jakarta: LP3ES.

Sudaryanto. 2015. Metode dan Aneka Teknik Analisis Bahasa (Pengantar Penelitian Wahana Kebudayaan secara Linguistik. Yogyakarta: Duta Wacana University Press.

Sugiyono. 2011. Metodelogi PenelitianKualitatif. Bandung: ALFABETA.

Walk, Anne McClure. 2010. “Two Distinct Sequence Learning Mechanisms for Synta Acquisition and Word Learning”. 1G1 Global. Chapter 25, Hal 540-549.

Wijana, I Dewa Putu & Muhammad Rohmadi. 2009. Analisis Wacana Pragmatik: Kajian Teori dan Analisis. Surakarta: Yuma Pustaka.

Yule, G. 2006. Pragmatics. New York: Oxford University Pers.


Article Metrics

 Abstract Views : 367 times
 PDF Downloaded : 0 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.