Advocating teaching and learning cycle derived from genre-based approach in teaching writing

  • December 26, 2021
  • Abstract Views: 0
  • Downloads: 0
  • Page: 690-705
Corresponding Author

Abstract

When writing in English, the students of SMA 15 Padang found two obstacles. The first issue was that the teacher's approach did not motivate students to write. This challenge increased the second issue, namely the students' apathy. The pupils were unmotivated and uninterested in writing. In other words, the students were uninterested. To address the two concerns, the researcher did a classroom action research that involved five stages: developing the context, modeling and deconstructing the text, cooperative production of the text, autonomous construction of the text, and linking to relevant text. The study found that implementing a teaching and learning cycle built from a genre-based approach might improve the teaching and learning process in writing classes. This was evident from the results of a checklist observation, which revealed that virtually all pupils appreciated the manner the instructor taught and that the majority of them were engaged in their study. The questionnaire results also revealed that 96 percent of the students were interested in the teacher's method and 98.8 percent of the pupils were already engaged in learning. By recording 10 pupils in each cycle, those data were also validated to the results of the interviews. According to the interview data, the majority of the students expressed an interest in the teacher's method and writing in English. Finally, implementing a teaching and learning cycle developed from a genre-based approach might increase students' enthusiasm to write in English. Hopefully, it will be a significant contribution for the teacher and other scholars to teach and conduct research, particularly in the teaching of writing.

Full Text:

References

Alkire, Andrew. 2007. "Competency Based Teaching", (Online), (http://www.Ic.ac.Id/conf Html, retrieved on January 10th, 2007 at 8. oo am)

Burn, Anne and Coffin, Caroline. 2003. Analyzing English in Global Context. New York: Open University Press.

Callaghan, Michael, and Rothery, Joan. 1993. Teaching Factual Writing: A Genre-Based Approach. Erskineville: Metropolitan East Disadvantaged Schools Program.

Candlin, N and Mercer, Neil. 2004. English Language Teaching in Its Social Context. London. The Open University.

Christie, Frances, J.R. 1997. Genre and Institution. Melbourne: University of Melbourne Press.

Departemen Pendidikan Nasional. 2003. Kurikulum 2004: standar kompetensi mata pelajaran bahasa Inggris sekolah menengah atas dan Madrasah Aliyah .Jakarta:Depdiknas

Dudley-Evans and John, Maggie Jo.1998. Developments in English for Specific Purposes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Emilia, Emi. 2005. "The Effectiveness of Genre Based Approach in Academic Teaching Writing at a State University in West Java", (Online), (http://curry. School. Sydney.edu/epltt/genrebasedapproach. Html, retrieved on June 3rd, 2006 at 8.00 am)

Feez, Susan and Joyce, Helen. 1998. Text-Based Syllabus Design. Sydney: National Center for English Language Teaching

Felder and Solomon. 2006. "Active Learners vs Passive Learners", (Online), (http://curry. School. Sydney.edu/epltt/genrebasedapproach. Html. Retrieved on June 10th, 2006 at 9.00 am)

Gay, R.L and Airisian. 2000. Educational Research. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.

Gerot, Linda and Wignell, Peter. 1995. Making Sense of Functional Grammar. Sydney: antipodean Educational Enterprises.

Hsu, Wenhua. 2006.Easing into Research Literacy through a Genre”. Journal of Foreign Language Teaching. Volume 3. No 1.

Hyland, Ken. 2004. Genre and Second Language Teaching. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.

Johnson, Andrew P. 2005. A Short Guide to Action Research. Boston:Pearson Education, Inc.

John, M and Soars, Liz.1998. Headway: Students Book. London. Oxford University Press.

Kasbolah, K. 1999. Penelitian Tindakan kelas. Jakarta. Depdikbud.

Kemmis, S and McTaggart. 1998. The Action Research Planner. Sydney: Deakin University Press.

Lamb, Martin. 2007. “How Motivating is Competency-Based English Teaching?”,(Online).http://coe.uga.edu/epltt/compbased.html, retrieved on February 7th .

Leki. 2006. “A Process Genre Model for Teaching Writing”. English teaching Forum. Vol 43 No 3

Martin. 1997. Genre and Institution. Melbourne. University of Melbourne press.

Mulyasa, E. 2004. Implementasi Kurikulum 2004. Bandung. Remaja Rosdakarya.

Patridge, Brian. 2001. Genre and the language Learning Classroom. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.

Richards, Jack C and Renandya, Willy A. 2002. Methodology in Language Teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Richards Coe. 1994. Genre and the language Learning Classroom. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.

Rinvolucri, Mario. 2007. Classroom Techniques: Unleashing Writing Creativity in Students. English Teaching Forum. Vol 43 No 4.

Rozimela, Yeni. 2005. “Exploring the concept of the Genre-Based Teaching, Presented on International Seminar and workshop, Empowering English teachers through current practices. Padang: IKIP Padang Press, on June 3rd-4th

Surapto, F.A and Darwis, Mariana.2005. Linked to the world: English for Senior High School Grade XI Science Program. Jakarta. Yudistira.

Swales, M. John. 1990. Genre Analysis: English in Academic and Research Setting.Cambridge. Cambridge University Press.

Ur, Penny. 2000. A Course in Language Teaching: Practice and Theory. Cambridge. Cambridge University Press.

Yan, Guo. 2006. “Genre and the language Learning Classroom”. English Teaching Forum. Vol 43 No. 3.

Yusmalinda. 2006. The Implementation of CTL in the Teaching of Integrated Skill”. Unpublished Thesis. Padang: State University of Padang.

Zumakhsin and Mufarichah, Y. 2005. Progress: A Contextual Approach to learning English for Senior High School 2.Jakarta. Ganeca Exact.

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.