Evaluation of the fulfillment of educational rights for children in conflict with the law through the filial school program

Ahmad Zulinto (1), Syukri Hamzah (2), Hadiwinarto Hadiwinarto (3),
(1) Universitas PGRI Palembang  Indonesia
(2) Universitas Bengkulu  Indonesia
(3) Universitas Bengkulu  Indonesia

Corresponding Author


DOI : https://doi.org/10.29210/020211180

Full Text:    Language : en

Abstract


The Palembang City Government through the Education Office in collaboration with the Regional Office of the Ministry of Law and Human Rights of South Sumatra Province as well as with other stakeholders initiated the implementation of Filial Schools Services for Child Prisoners at LPKA Class I Palembang. This study aimed at evaluating Filial Schools Filial Schools for Child Prisoners at LPKA Class I Palembang. This was evaluation research with a qualitative approach and using CIPP model. Data collection in this research was through observation, interviews, and documentation. The subjects of this study consisted of an accompanying teacher, a party from the Education Office, and a student. The data were analysed using Miles and Huberman model. The validity of the research data was obtained by using triangulation techniques by comparing the data from interviews, observations, and documentation. The study found that the fulfillment of educational right for children in conflict with the law through the Filial School Program at LPKA Class 1 Palembang has been going well. Based on the monitoring results, most of the children who have completed their education at LPKA have been able to improve their welfare. The Filial school program in providing the right to formal education for children through Quality Formal Education Services for Children at LPKA Class I Palembang has been going well. This program also presents the same curriculum as formal schools, also equipped with character building, as well as the development of various skills in students.

References


Angelina, N. (2013). Pemenuhan Kebutuhan Hak Pendidikan Formal Bagi Anak Yang Berhadapan Dengan Hukum Sebagai Upaya Mewujudkan Kota Layak Anak Di Surakarta. Sosialitas; Jurnal Ilmiah Pend. Sos Ant, 3(1).

Estriyanto, Y. (2016). A Review of Indonesian Pre-Service Teacher Certification Policy from the Point of View of the Philosophy of Vocational Education. Prosiding ICTTE FKIP UNS 2015, 1(1).

Bappeda Litbang. (2019). Rencana Kerja Pemerintah Daerah Kota Palembang Tahun Anggaran 2020. Bappeda Litbang (Badan Perencanaan Pembangunan Daerah Penelitian dan Pengembangan) Pemerintah Kota Palembang.

Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia 1945.

Djamin, M. N. (2013). Pimpinan Panja RUU Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak Komisi III DPR RI, Anak Bukan Untuk Dihukum. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.

Fattah, N. (2004). Landasan Manajemen Pendidikan. Bandung: PT. Remaja Rosdakarya.

Gunung, I. N., & Darma, I. K. (2019). Implementing the context, input, process, product (CIPP) evaluation model to measure the effectiveness of the implementation of teaching at Politeknik Negeri Bali (PNB). International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 14(1), 33-39.

Hasan, H. (2009). Evaluasi Kurikulum, cetakan kedua. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.

Hidayat, B. (2010). Pemidanaan Anak di Bawah Umur. Bandung: PT Alumni.

Inderbitzin, M. (2006). Lessons From a Juvenile Training School: Survival and Growth. Journal of Adolescent Research, 21(1), 7–26.

Law Number 20 of 2003

Law Number 12 of 1995 about Penitentiary

Limpo, I. Y., Bachri, S., Ilmar, A., & Patittingi, F. (2018) Potret of Basic Education in Indonesia (A Legal Political Study). Journal of Law, Policy and Globalization, Vol. 69.

Mawangi, R. K. (2019). The Role of Family in Dealing with Juvenile Delinquency. Open Journal of Social Sciences. Open Journal of Social Sciences, 7(3), 52–63.

Nugroho, G. W. F., & Novianto, W. T. (2018). Perlindungan Hak-Hak Anak dalam Proses Pembinaan di Lembaga Pembinaan Khusus Anak Kelas I Kutoarjo. Recidive, 7(3), 262–274.

Sopandi, E., & Khasanah. (2020). Evaluation of Implementation of Inclusion Education Programs in Madrasah Ibtidaiyah Badrussalam Surabaya. Akademika, 9(1).

Stufflebeam, D. L. (2003). The CIPP model for evaluation. In D. L. Stufflebeam & T. Kellaghan (Eds.), The international handbook of educational evaluation (Chapter 2). Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

Sugiyono. (2016). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Sukardi. (2014). Evaluasi Program Pendidikan dan Pelatihan. Jakarta: PT. Bumi Aksara.

Supeno, H. (2010). Kriminalisasi Anak Tawaran Gagasan Radikal Peradilan Anak Tanpa Pemidanaan. Jakarta: PT Gramedia Pusaka Utama.

Tambunan, R., Ablisar, M., Mulyadi, M., & Ikhsan, E. (2015). Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Anak yang Berkonflik dengan Hukum dalam Memperoleh Pendidikan. USU Law Journal, 3(1), 123–135.

The Regulation of Minister Education Number 49 of 2014.

Widoyoko, E. P. (2009). Evaluasi Program Pembelajaran: Panduan Praktis Bagi Pendidik dan Calon Pendidik, Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Zhang, G., Zeller, N., Griffith, R., Metcalf, D, Williams, J., Shea C., & Misulis, K. (2011). Using the Context, Input, Process, and Product Evaluation Model (CIPP) as a Comprehensive Framework to Guide the Planning, Implementation, and Assessment of Service-learning Programs. Journal of Higher Education Outreach and Engagement, 15(4), 57-63.


Article Metrics

 Abstract Views : 851 times
 PDF Downloaded : 0 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.