Performance of village facilitators in sustainable community empowerment

Abstract

This study aimed to analyze and describe the performance of village assistants in sustainable community empowerment activities in Lalonaha Village, Wolo District, Kolaka Regency. Qualitative descriptive research method. Data obtained through interviews, literature study, and observation. The data analysis stage uses the Miles and Huberman method, namely data collection, data presentation, data verification, and concluding. Based on the research results, village assistants' capability in its implementation has not optimally because there are still many priority programs that people should expect but have not implemented. Activities carried out by village assistants in terms of development implementation, development supervision, and village administration training carried out by village assistants in Lalonaha Village, Wolo District have been able to run well, it is just that the obstacles faced regarding the quality of work by village assistants have not been able to carry out proper coordination fully. Both between the Lalonaha Village Government and the village community. In the implementation stage of village facilitator activities to help village government activities have not been able to run well, this is because in every development activity and supervision of development programs carried out more by the village apparatus themselves. The independence of village assistants in improving community empowerment in the village Lalonaha has not gone well because the village government itself carries out almost all the implementation of village assistance activities.
References
  1. Alers, S., Wesselborg, S., & Stork, B. (2014). ATG13: just a companion, or an executor of the autophagic program?. Autophagy, 10(6), 944-956.
  2. Bintoro, & Daryanto. (2017). Manajemen Penilaian Kinerja Karyawan. Cetakan 1. Gava Media.
  3. Cane, P., & Conaghan, J. (2008). The new Oxford companion to law.
  4. Carlson, M. (2013). Performance: A critical introduction. Routledge.
  5. Dianto, I. (2019). Problematika Pendamping Desa Profesional dalam Pemberdayaan Masyarakat Desa di Kota Padangsidimpuan. Dimas: Jurnal Pemikiran Agama untuk Pemberdayaan, 18(2), 239. https://doi.org/10.21580/dms.2018.182.2829
  6. Duflo, E. (2012). Women empowerment and economic development. Journal of Economic literature, 50(4), 1051-79.
  7. Hilman, L., Cikusin, Y., & Abidin, A. Z. (2019). Efektifitas Kinerja Pendamping Lokal Desa Dalam Pembangunan Desa (Studi di Desa Jambu Kecsmatan Lenteng Kabupaten Sumenep). Respon Publik, 13(3), 90–95.
  8. Huang, M., Li, F., Dong, F., Zhang, Y. X., & Zhang, L. L. (2015). MnO 2-based nanostructures for high-performance supercapacitors. Journal of Materials Chemistry A, 3(43), 21380-21423.
  9. Irfan, I., & Tahir, M. (2020). Peran Pendamping Desa Dalam Mewujudkan Desa Mandiri (Studi di Desa Karampi Kecamatan Langgudu Kabupaten Bima). EDU SOCIATA (Jurnal Pendidikan Sosiologi), 4(1), 37–48. https://doi.org/10.33627/es.v4i1.410
  10. Miles, & Huberman. (1992). Analisis Data Kualitatif. Dialih bahasakan oleh Tjetjep Rohendri Rohidi. ,. PT Remaja Rosdakarya.
  11. Murti, E., Harianto, & Iswati, R. (2020). Pengaruh program satu desa satu produk (one village one product), terhadap pengembangan ekonomi desa. Seminar Nasional Sistem Informasi 2020-UNMER Malang.
  12. O’Hare, P. (2018). Resisting the ‘Long‐Arm’ of the State? Spheres of Capture and Opportunities for Autonomy in Community Governance. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research - Wiley Online Library. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/1468-2427.12606
  13. Peraturan Menteri Desa, Pembangunan Daerah Tertinggal, Dan Transmigrasi Republik Indonesia Nomor 3 Tahun 2015 Tentang Pendampingan Desa
  14. Peraturan Pemerintah Republik Indonesia No 47 Tahun 2015 perubahan atas peraturan pemerintah nomor 43 tahun 2014 tentang peraturan pelaksanaan undang-undang nomor 6 tahun 2014 tentang Desa.
  15. Peraturan Presiden Nomor 12 tahun 2015 tentang Kementerian Desa, Pembangunan Daerah Tertinggal dan Transmigrasi
  16. Porter, M. (2003). The economic performance of regions. Regional studies, 37(6-7), 549-578.
  17. Rambe, J., Badaruddin, B., & Kadir, A. (2020). Konsep Pendampingan dalam Struktur Pemerintahan Indonesia: Mengapa Pendamping Lokal Desa Harus Ada? PERSPEKTIF, 9, 263–269. https://doi.org/10.31289/perspektif.v9i2.3545
  18. Susanti, M. H. (2017). Peran Pendamping Desa Dalam Mendorong Prakarsa Dan Partisipasi Masyarakat Menuju Desa Mandiri Di Desa Gonoharjo Kecamatan Limbangan Kabupaten Kendal. Integralistik, 28(1), 29–39. https://doi.org/10.15294/integralistik.v28i1.11809
  19. Susanti, R. (2015). Efektivitas Pendampingan Desa Dan Partisipasi Masyarakat Dalam Pembangunan Infrastruktur Pedesaan Di Desa Sekodi Kecamatan Bengkalis Kabupaten Bengkalis. Jom FISIP, 2(1).
  20. Sutanto, S. L. (2017). Implementasi Program Pendamping Profesional Desa: Program Pembangunan Dan Pemberdayaan Masyarakat Desa (P3md) Di Kabupaten Bojonegoro. Badan Penelitian dan Pengembangan Provinsi Jawa Timur.
  21. Triyanto, D. (2018). Analisis Kinerja Pendamping Desa Dalam Upaya Membangun Kemandirian Desa. MIMBAR : Jurnal Penelitian Sosial Dan Politik, 7(2), 56. https://doi.org/10.32663/jpsp.v7i2.669
  22. Undang-Undang Nomor 9 Tahun 2015 Tentang Pelaksanaan Pemerintahan Daerah.
  23. Undang-Undang Nomor 6 Tahun 2014 Tentang Desa.
  24. Wibowo. (2013). Manajemen Kinerja. Edisi Ketiga. Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo Persada.
  25. Yuslaini, N., & Juliana, S. (2019). Evaluasi Program Pendamping Desa Di Kabupaten Bengkalis. WEDANA: Jurnal Kajian Pemerintahan, Politik Dan Birokrasi, 5(2), 7–15. https://doi.org/10.25299/wedana.2019.vol5(2).4180
  26. Zimmerman, M. A. (2000). Empowerment theory. In Handbook of community psychology (pp. 43-63). Springer, Boston, MA.
  27. Zollo, M., & Meier, D. (2008). What is M&A performance?. Academy of management perspectives, 22(3), 55-77.