Perception of tourism vocational high school teachers in the learning environment survey on the implementation of national assessment in 2021

  • Rahmadan Rahmadan 
    Universitas Bengkulu
    Indonesia
  • Syukri Hamzah
    Universitas Bengkulu
    Indonesia

Abstract

This article describes the perception of tourism Vocational High School Teachers in Bengkulu City, Bengkulu Province in the Learning Environment Survey on the implementation of the 2021 National Assessment. The purpose of this study is to describethe level of teacher preparation and the level of teacher implementation implementation in the Learning Environment Survey activities in schools; alsodescribing the impression and/or message, supporting factors and inhibiting factors; and solutions or efforts to overcome the inhibiting factors of the Learning Environment Survey activities in schools in the 2021 National Assessment activities. This research is a Qualitative Descriptive Study on Tourism-based Vocational High School Teachers in Bengkulu City, Bengkulu Province.In this research, the researcher use Miles and Huberman’s theory in analyzing the dataconsists of three concurrent flows of activity: data reduction, data display, and conclusion drawing/verification. Based on the results of the study, it can be concluded that the perception of tourism-based Vocational High School Teachers in the Learning Environment Survey on the implementation of Assessment National in 2021 is really positive and hopes that the implementation of the Learning Environment Survey next year can run even better along with the improvement in the quality of the learning climate in an effort to create a conducive learning system and atmosphere in schools so that it has a very good and significant impact in achieving improvement. student achievement and learning outcomes.
Keywords
  • Perception
  • Tourism-Based Vocational High School Teachers
  • Survey Learning Environment
References
  1. Albar, M. K., Purnomo, S., Munif, F., & Azizah, I. N. (2021). Madrasah Development through Trust Building at MI Ma’arif NU Teluk Purwokerto, Indonesia. Journal of Learning and Development Studies, 1(1), 100–108.
  2. Billet, S. (2011). Vocational education: A field and sector of education. In Vocational education (pp. 1–20). Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1954-5_1 Bluman, A. G. (2012). Elementary statistics: A step by step approach (7th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13398-014-0173-7.
  3. Birnbaum, S. A. (2021). 1 Jewish languages. University of Toronto Press.
  4. Brewster, A. B., & Bowen, G. L. (2004). Teacher support and the school engagement of Latino middle and high school students at risk of school failure. Child and Adolescent Social Work Journal, 21(1), 47–67. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:CASW.0000012348.83939.6b
  5. Canale, M. (1988). The Measurement of Communicative Competence. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 8, 67–84. https://doi.org/doi:10.1017/S0267190500001033 Chomsky, N. (1965). Aspects of the theory of syntax. Aspects of the Theory of Syntax (Vol. 11). https://doi.org/10.1016/0732-118X(86)90008-5
  6. Choppin, J., Amador, J., Callard, C., Carson, C., Gillespie, R., Kruger, J., Martin, S., & Foster, G. (2021). A Three-Part Synchronous Online Model for Middle Grade Mathematics Teachers’ Professional Development. In Online Learning in Mathematics Education (pp. 167–186). Springer.
  7. Cox, A., & Williams, L. (2008). e role of perceived teacher support, motivational climate, and psy-chological need satisfaction in students’ physical education motivation. Journal of Sport and Ex-ercise Psychology, 30(2), 222–239. https://doi.org/10.1123/jsep.30.2.222
  8. Dietrich, J., Dicke, A. L., Kracke, B., & Noack, P. (2015). Teacher support and its inuence on students’ intrinsic value and eort: Dimensional comparison eects across subjects. Learning and Instruc-tion, 39 , 45–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2015.05.007
  9. Dyson, B., Howley, D., & Wright, P. M. (2021). A scoping review critically examining research connecting social and emotional learning with three model-based practices in physical education: Have we been doing this all along? European Physical Education Review, 27(1), 76–95.
  10. Fawns, T., & Sinclair, C. (2021). Towards ecological evaluation of online courses: aiming for thick description. In Online Postgraduate Education in a Postdigital World (pp. 85–104). Springer.
  11. Handayani, M., Perdana, N. S., & Ukhlumudin, I. (2021). Readiness of Teachers and Students to Take Minimum Competency Assessments. International Conference on Educational Assessment and Policy (ICEAP 2020), 73–79.
  12. Jia, L., Lim, C. H., Ismail, I., & Tan, Y. C. (2021). Stunted upward mobility in a learning environment reduces the academic benefits of growth mindsets. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 118(10).
  13. Jones, G. A. (2021). Challenges Educators Encounter Implementing Antibullying Programs in Classrooms. Walden University.
  14. Megawati, L. A., & Sutarto, H. (2021). Analysis numeracy literacy skills in terms of standardized math problem on a minimum competency assessment. Unnes Journal of Mathematics Education, 10(2).
  15. Nasir, M., Hamzah, S. H., & Rijal, M. K. (2021). Anatomical Analysis of Islamic Religious Education Curriculum at General Higher Education in Indonesia. Ta’dib, 24(1), 53–69.
  16. Sartika, A. N., Puspita, H., & Imranuddin. (2018). Model of communicative english syllabus for students of hotel department at SMKN 7 Bengkulu. Journal ofEnglish Education and Teaching (JEET), 2.
  17. Savignon, S. J. (1983). Reading. In MA (Ed.), Communicative competence: theory and classroom practice (pp. 8–9). Addison-Wesley.
  18. Slameto. (2010).Learning and influencing factors. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
  19. Shaturaev, J. (2021). Indigent Condition In Education And Low Academic Outcomes In Public Education System Of Indonesia And Uzbekistan. АрхивНаучныхИсследований, 1(1).
  20. Shohel, M. M. C., Ashrafuzzaman, M., Alam, A. S., Mahmud, A., Ahsan, M. S., & Islam, M. T. (2021). Preparedness of Students for Future Teaching and Learning in Higher Education: A Bangladeshi Perspective. In New Student Literacies amid COVID-19: International Case Studies. Emerald Publishing Limited.
  21. Sonmez, F. D., Cuhadar, S., & Kahvecioglu, M. K. (2021). Successes, challenges, and next steps in implementing outcome-based assessment: The case of Istanbul Bilgi University Library. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 47(1), 102249.
  22. Supranata, S. (2005). Analysis, validity, reliability and interpretation of test results. Bandung: PT. Rosdakarya Youth.
  23. Tohara, A. J. T. (2021). Exploring Digital Literacy Strategies for Students with Special Educational Needs in the Digital Age. Turkish Journal of Computer and Mathematics Education (TURCOMAT), 12(9), 3345–3358.
  24. Zou, C., Li, P., & Jin, L. (2021). Online college English education in Wuhan against the COVID-19 pandemic: Student and teacher readiness, challenges and implications. PloS One, 16(10), e0258137.

Downloads

PDF

Statistic

Abstract Views
: 401 times
PDF
: 7 times