Inventori perilaku kerja inovatif guru indonesia: analisis rasch model

Rais Hidayat(1), Baharuddin Baharuddin(2), Donna Sampaleng(3), Yuyun Elizabeth Patras(4),
(1) Universitas Pakuan  Indonesia
(2) Universitas Islam 45 Bekasi  Indonesia
(3) STT IKAT  Indonesia
(4) Universitas Pakuan  Indonesia

Corresponding Author


DOI : https://doi.org/10.29210/020221360

Full Text:    Language : id

Abstract


The purpose of this research was to find the items of the teacher's innovative work behavior instrument during the Covid 19 pandemic and recommend several things to improve it. The teacher's innovative work behavior instrument was developed through a study of concepts and theories of innovative work behavior until a draft instrument was obtained that met content validity, logical validity, examination by experts to obtain expert validity, and testing of 10 teachers. Instruments that have been corrected based on input from the teacher are then distributed via google-form. Determination of the number of samples in this study using purposive sampling. In this study, researchers chose teachers as respondents with a sample size of 1200. Data analysis used the Rasch model. The findings of this research are that the teacher's innovative work behavior instrument  during the  Covid 19 period, which consists of 11 indicators based on the Rasch model, has met the requirements for use in research. This study recommends 5 things to improve PKIG, namely: (i) making scientific papers, (ii) learning that exceeds the standard, (iii) mentoring other teachers, (iv) pioneering the use of ICT for learning, and (v) struggling to get new ideas/products accepted by others. Based on these recommendations, the implications of this research are that teachers need to be encouraged to conduct research in schools, teach exceeding standards, monitor each other among teachers, cultivate a culture of using learning technology, and promote all teacher innovation products to other parties.

Keywords


Innovative work behavior Teacher's innovative work behavior, Research instrument, Covid 19, Rasch Model

References


Abdaziz, A., Jusoh, M. S., & Amlus, H. (2014). Construct Validity : A Rasch Measurement Model Approaches. Journal of Applied Science and Agriculture, 9(September), 7–12.

Ahya, M., Ahmad, S., & Fitriani, Y. (2021). The Role of Principal and Teacher Leadership to Improve the Quality of Learning in SMA Negeri 5 OKU. Edunesia : Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan, 2(2), 411–423. https://doi.org/10.51276/edu.v2i2.134

Akram, T., Lei, S., Haider, M. J., & Hussain, S. T. (2020). The impact of organizational justice on employee innovative work behavior: Mediating role of knowledge sharing. Suma de Negocios, 5(2), 117–129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2019.10.001

Annury, M. N. (2019). Peningkatan Kompetensi Profesional Guru melalui Penelitian Tindakan Kelas. Dimas: Jurnal Pemikiran Agama Untuk Pemberdayaan, 18(2), 177. https://doi.org/10.21580/dms.2018.182.3258

Azevedo, A., & Jo, M. (2019). The International Journal of A new training program in developing cultural intelligence can also improve innovative work behavior and resilience : A longitudinal pilot study of graduate students and professional employees. The International Journal of Management Education, 17(3), 100303. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2019.05.004

Azizah, A., & Wahyuningsih, S. (2020). Penggunaan Model Rasch Untuk Analisis Instrumen Tes Pada Mata Kuliah Matematika Aktuaria. JUPITEK: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 3(1), 45–50. https://doi.org/10.30598/jupitekvol3iss1pp45-50

Baghaei, P. (2014). The Rasch Model as a Construct Validation Tool. Rasch Measurement Transactions, 22(1).

Bambang Sumintono, W. W. (2014). Aplikasi Model Rasch Untuk Penelitian Ilmu-Ilmu Sosial. Trim Komunikata.

Boone, W. J. (2020). Rasch Basics fot the Novice. In M. S. Khine (Ed.), Rasch measurement: Applications in quantitative educational research (pp. 1–281). Spirnger. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-1800-3

Boone, W. J., & Staver, J. R. (2020). Correction to: Advances in Rasch Analyses in the Human Sciences. In Advances in Rasch Analyses in the Human Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-43420-5_21

Brinkman, W.-P. (2009). Design of a Questionnaire Instrument. Handbook of Mobile Technology Research Methods, December, 31–57.

Burbules, N. C., Fan, G., & Repp, P. (2020). Five trends of education and technology in a sustainable future. Geography and Sustainability, 1(2), 93–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geosus.2020.05.001

Carmeli, A., Meitar, R., & Weisberg, J. (2006). Self-leadership skills and innovative behavior at work. International Journal of Manpower, 27(1), 75–90. https://doi.org/10.1108/01437720610652853

Carvalho, L. de F., Primi, R., & Meyer, G. J. (2012a). Application of the Rasch model in measuring personality disorders. Trends in Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, 34(2), 101–109. https://doi.org/10.1590/S2237-60892012000200009

Carvalho, L. de F., Primi, R., & Meyer, G. J. (2012b). Application of the Rasch model in measuring personality disorders Aplicação. Trends in Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, 34(2), 101–109. https://doi.org/10.1590/S2237-60892012000200009

Dahiya, R., & Raghuvanshi, J. (2021). Asia Paci fi c Management Review Validation of innovative work behaviour scale : Indian apparel manufacturing sector. Asia Pacific Management Review, xxxx. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmrv.2021.06.002

Davier, M. von. (2007). Multivariate and Mixture Distribution Rasch Models. In C. H. Carstensen (Ed.), Statistics for Social and Behavioral Sciences. Springer.

Day, C., Elliot, B., & Kington, A. (2005). Reform , standards and teacher identity : Challenges of sustaining commitment. Teaching and Teacher Education, 21, 563–577. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2005.03.001

De Jong, J., & Den Hartog, D. (2010). Measuring innovative work behaviour. Creativity and Innovation Management, 19(1), 23–36. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8691.2010.00547.x

Di Pietro, G., Biagi, F., Costa, P., Karpiński, Z., & Mazza, J. (2020). The Likely Impact of COVID-19 on Education: Reflections based on the Existing Literature and Recent International Datasets. In Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg: Vol. EUR 30275 (Issue JRC121071). https://doi.org/10.2760/126686

Dincer, H., Gencer, G., Orhan, N., & Sahinbas, K. (2011). The Significance of Emotional Intelligence on the Innovative Work Behavior of Managers as Strategic Decision-Makers. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 24, 909–919. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.09.052

Emerson, R. W. (2017). Likert Scales. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 111(5), 488–488. https://doi.org/10.1177/0145482x1711100511

Etikan, I. (2016). Comparison of Convenience Sampling and Purposive Sampling. American Journal of Theoretical and Applied Statistics, 5(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajtas.20160501.11

Ghazali, N. H. M. (2016). A Reliability and Validity of an Instrument to Evaluate the School-Based Assessment System : A Pilot Study. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education (IJERE), 5(2), 148–157.

Hadžibajramović, E., Schaufeli, W., & De Witte, H. (2020). A Rasch analysis of the Burnout Assessment Tool (BAT). PLoS ONE, 15(11 November), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0242241

Hakim, S., Sowiyah, S., Fitriyanti, Z., & Perdana, R. (2021). The Effect of Academic Supervision in Improving Teacher Performance: A Literature Review. ICOPE, 16–17. https://doi.org/10.4108/eai.16-10-2020.2305197

Hardianto, H., Hidayat, H., & Zulkifli, Z. (2021). Perilaku kerja inovatif bagi guru dan tenaga kependidikan. JPPI (Jurnal Penelitiam Pendidikan Indonesia), 7(1), 112–119.

Hidayat, R., Hardhienata, S., Patras, Y. E., & Agustin, R. R. (2020). The effects of situational leadership and self-efficacy on the improvement of teachers ’ work productivity using correlation analysis and SITOREM. COUNS-EDU :The International Journal of Counseling and Education, 5(1), 6–14.

Hidayat, R., Suhardi, E., & Patras, Y. E. (2019). Instrumen Kepuasan Mahasiswa Universitas Swasta Dengan Menggunakan Pemodelan Rasch. Kelola: Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan, 6(2), 169–178. https://doi.org/10.24246/j.jk.2019.v6.i2.p169-178

Ho, P. (2019). A new approach to measuring Overall Liking with the Many-Facet Rasch Model. Food Quality and Preference, 74(January), 100–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2019.01.015

Hosseini, S., & Haghighi Shirazi, Z. R. (2021). Towards teacher innovative work behavior: A conceptual model. Cogent Education, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2020.1869364

Ismiantari, F. D. (2021). PERBEDAAN PERILAKU KERJA INOVATIF PADA GURU DITINJAU DARI KARAKTERISTIK SEKOLAH Firda Dwi Ismiantari Olievia Prabandini Mulyana Abstrak. Character: Jurnal Penelitian Psikologi, 8(6), 1–12.

Jesson, R., McNaughton, S., Wilson, A., Zhu, T., & Cockle, V. (2018). Improving Achievement Using Digital Pedagogy: Impact of a Research Practice Partnership in New Zealand. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 50(3), 183–199. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2018.1436012

Jesyca R.T. Muaju, Adi Setiawan, T. M. (2013). Uji Validitas dan Reliabilitas Menggunakan Metode Boostrap pada Kuisioner Ripe Yes/No Questions. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Sains Dan Pendidikan Sains VII, 513.

Johari, A. B., Wahat, N. W. A., & Zaremohzzabieh, Z. (2021). Innovative Work Behavior among Teachers in Malaysia: The Effects of Teamwork, Principal Support, and Humor. Asian Journal of University Education, 17(2), 72–84. https://doi.org/10.24191/AJUE.V17I2.13387

Joshi, A., Kale, S., Chandel, S., & Pal, D. (2015). Likert Scale: Explored and Explained. British Journal of Applied Science & Technology, 7(4), 396–403. https://doi.org/10.9734/bjast/2015/14975

Jusoh. (2018). Construct Validity for Measuring Entrepreneurial Readiness Among Malaysian Higher Education Students : A Stochastic Measurement Model Approach. MATEC Web of Conferences 150, 150, 1–4.

Kang, J. H., Matusik, J. G., Kim, T. Y., & Phillips, J. M. (2016). Interactive effects of multiple organizational climates on employee innovative behavior in entrepreneurial firms: A cross-level investigation. Journal of Business Venturing, 31(6), 628–642. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2016.08.002

Kate Thornton. (2021). Principal leadership practices during the COVID-19 lockdown. Journal of Educational Leadership, Policy and Practice, 36, 59–77. https://search.informit.com.au/documentSummary;dn=967470949808464;res=IELNZC

Khan, A., Khan, S., Zia-Ul-Islam, S., & Khan, M. (2017). Communication Skills of a Teacher and Its Role in the Development of the Students’ Academic Success. Journal of Education and Practice, 8(1), 18–21.

Khasanah, I. F. N., & Himam, F. (2019). Kepemimpinan Transformasional Kepribadian Proaktif dan Desain Kerja sebagai Prediktor Perilaku Kerja Inovatif. Gadjah Mada Journal of Psychology (GamaJoP), 4(2), 143. https://doi.org/10.22146/gamajop.46361

Kör, B., Wakkee, I., & Sijde, P. Van Der. (2020). Technovation How to promote managers ’ innovative behavior at work : Individual factors and perceptions. Technovation, July 2019, 102127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2020.102127

Kovacs, H. (2017). Learning and Teaching in Innovation: why it is important for education in 21st century. Neveléstudomány, 5(2), 45–60. https://doi.org/10.21549/ntny.18.2017.2.4

Lans, R. M. Van Der, Grift, W. J. C. M. Van De, & Veen, K. Van. (2017). Developing an Instrument for Teacher Feedback : Using the Rasch Model to Explore Teachers ’ Development of Effective Teaching Strategies and Behaviors Developing an Instrument for Teacher Feedback : Using the Rasch. The Journal of Experimental Education, 0(0), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220973.2016.1268086

Lapeniene, D., & Dumciene, A. (2014). Teachers’ Creativity: Different Approaches and Similar Results. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 116, 279–284. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.208

Luu, T. T. (2019). Can diversity climate shape service innovative behavior in Vietnamese and Brazilian tour companies ? The role of work passion. Tourism Management, 72(December 2018), 326–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2018.12.011

Mohajan, H. K. (2017a). Two Criteria for Good Measurements in Research: Validity and Reliability. Annals of Spiru Haret University, 17(3), 1–32.

Mohajan, H. K. (2017b). Two Criteria for Good Measurements in Research: Validity and Reliability. Annals of Spiru Haret University. Economic Series, 17(4), 59–82. https://doi.org/10.26458/1746

Newman, A., Tse, H. H. M., Schwarz, G., & Nielsen, I. (2018). The effects of employees’ creative self-efficacy on innovative behavior: The role of entrepreneurial leadership. Journal of Business Research, 89(March), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.04.001

Nguyen, D., Pietsch, M., & Gümüs, S. (2021). Collective teacher innovativeness in 48 countries : Effects of teacher autonomy , collaborative culture , and professional learning. Teaching and Teacher Education, 106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2021.103463

Nguyen, T. P. L., Nguyen, K. N., Do, T. D., & Nguyen, T. T. M. (2019). Knowledge sharing and innovative work behavior: The case of Vietnam. Uncertain Supply Chain Management, 7(4), 619–634. https://doi.org/10.5267/j.uscm.2019.5.001

Nordgren, K., Kristiansson, M., Liljekvist, Y., & Bergh, D. (2021). Collegial collaboration when planning and preparing lessons: A large-scale study exploring the conditions and infrastructure for teachers’ professional development. Teaching and Teacher Education, 108, 103513. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2021.103513

Oliveira, A., Feyzi Behnagh, R., Ni, L., Mohsinah, A. A., Burgess, K. J., & Guo, L. (2019). Emerging technologies as pedagogical tools for teaching and learning science: A literature review. Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies, 1(2), 149–160. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbe2.141

Onne Janssen. (2000). Job demands, perceptions of effort-reward fairness nd innovative work behavior. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 287–302.

Orakc, Ş. (2020). The structural relationship between accountability felt and responsible teaching in Turkish teachers : The mediating e ff ect of innovative thinking. 36(December 2019), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2020.100662

Othman, N. B. (2014). Assessing Construct Validity and Reliability Of Competitiveness Scale Using Rasch Model Approach. The 2014 WEI International Academic Conference Proceedings, 113–120.

Pandey, A., Gupta, V., & Gupta, R. K. (2019). Spirituality and innovative behaviour in teams : Examining the mediating role of team learning. IIMB Manajemen Review, 31, 116–126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iimb.2019.03.013

Pangestu, U. (2021). THE ROLE OF THE PRINCIPAL TO INCREASE TEACHER INNOVATION AND CREATIVITY DURING THE PANDEMIC. Nidhomul Haq: Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan Islam, 6(2).

Pokhrel, S., & Chhetri, R. (2021). A Literature Review on Impact of COVID-19 Pandemic on Teaching and Learning. Higher Education for the Future, 8(1), 133–141. https://doi.org/10.1177/2347631120983481

Pranatawijaya, V. H., Widiatry, W., Priskila, R., & Putra, P. B. A. A. (2019). Penerapan Skala Likert dan Skala Dikotomi Pada Kuesioner Online. Jurnal Sains Dan Informatika, 5(2), 128–137. https://doi.org/10.34128/jsi.v5i2.185

Prasetya, A. B., Purnama, D. S., & Prasetyo, F. W. (2020). Validity and Reliability of The Perceived Stress Scale with RASCH Model. PSIKOPEDAGOGIA Jurnal Bimbingan Dan Konseling, 8(2), 2–5. https://doi.org/10.12928/psikopedagogia.v8i2.17903

Purwanto, A., Pramono, R., Asbari, M., Hyun, C. C., Wijayanti, L. M., Putri, R. S., & Santoso, P. B. (2020). Studi Eksploratif Dampak Pandemi COVID-19 Terhadap Proses Pembelajaran Online di Sekolah Dasar. Journal of Education, Psychology and Counseling, 2(1), 1–12. https://ummaspul.e-journal.id/Edupsycouns/article/view/397

Putra, P., Liriwati, F. Y., Tahrim, T., Syafrudin, S., & Aslan, A. (2020). The Students Learning from Home Experiences during Covid-19 School Closures Policy In Indonesia. Jurnal Iqra’ : Kajian Ilmu Pendidikan, 5(2), 30–42. https://doi.org/10.25217/ji.v5i2.1019

Rachman, T., & Napitupulu, D. B. (2017). Rasch Model for Validation a User Acceptance Instrument for Evaluating E-learning System. CommIT (Communication and Information Technology) Journal, 11(1), 9. https://doi.org/10.21512/commit.v11i1.2042

Rahmawati, E. (2019). Developing instruments of teacher ’ s perception of critical thinking in elementary school. Journal of Education and Learning (EduLearn), 13(4), 559–566. https://doi.org/10.11591/edulearn.v13i4.13232

Ramamoorthy, N., Flood, P. C., Slattery, T., & Sardessai, R. (2005). Determinants of Innovative Work Behaviour: Development and Test of an Integrated Model. Creativity and Innovation Management, 14(2), 142–150. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8691.2005.00334.x

RERKE, V. I., TATARINOVA, L. V, BUBNOVA, I. S., BABITSKAYA, L. A., & BAKHAREVA, E. V. (2020). Creativity and innovations of teachers of modern school: empirical aspect. Creatividad e Innovación de Los Profesores de La Escuela Moderna: Aspecto Empírico., 41(6), 1. https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=edb&AN=142572636&site=eds-live

Sannen, J., De Maeyer, S., Struyf, E., De Schauwer, E., & Petry, K. (2021). Connecting teacher collaboration to inclusive practices using a social network approach. Teaching and Teacher Education, 97, 103182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2020.103182

Sharma, S., & Al-Sinawai, S. (2019). Attitudinal Differences Towards Instructional Supervision: A Study of Teacher Beliefs and Supervisory Behaviour in Malaysia. International Education Studies, 12(8), 106. https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v12n8p106

Siahaan, M. (2020). Dampak Pandemi Covid-19 Terhadap Dunia Pendidikan. Jurnal Kajian Ilmiah, 1(1), 73–80. https://doi.org/10.31599/jki.v1i1.265

Siti Eshah Mokshein, H. I. and H. A. (2019). The Use of Rasch Measurement Model In English Testing. Cakrawala Pendidikan, 38(1), 16–32. https://doi.org/10.21831/cp.v38i1.22750

Sudibjo, N., & Prameswari, R. K. (2021). The effects of knowledge sharing and person – organization fi t on the relationship between transformational leadership on innovative work behavior. Heliyon, 7(March), e07334. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e07334

Sulistiowati, S. (2018). Peningkatan Perilaku Inovatif Perajin Tenun Melalui Perilaku Berbagi Pengetahuan dan Efikasi Diri. Jurnal Ekonomi Bisnis Dan Kewirausahaan, 7(3), 168. https://doi.org/10.26418/jebik.v7i3.27236

Sumintono, B. (2020). Aplikasi Pemodelan Rasch dalam menyiapkan Bank Soal. Fakultas Pendidikan.

Sumintono, B., & Widhiarso, W. (2014). Aplikasi Model Rasch untuk Penelitian Ilmu-Ilmu Sosial (Issue November). Tim Komunikata Publishing House.

Terry, H., Umbase, R. S., Pelealu, A. E., Burdam, Y., & Dasfordate, A. (2020). Teacher Creativity and School Climate. Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, 226(Icss), 708–710. https://doi.org/10.2991/icss-18.2018.143

Triono, D., Sarno, R., & Sungkono, K. R. (2020). Item Analysis for examination test in the postgraduate student’s selection with classical test theory and rasch measurement model. Proceedings - 2020 International Seminar on Application for Technology of Information and Communication: IT Challenges for Sustainability, Scalability, and Security in the Age of Digital Disruption, ISemantic 2020, 523–529. https://doi.org/10.1109/iSemantic50169.2020.9234204

van Buuren, S., & Wijnmalen, D. J. D. (2015). Measuring Psychosocial Impact of CBRN Incidents by the Rasch Model. Journal of Applied Measurement, 16(3), 242–250.

Villalonga-Olives, E., Kawachi, I., & Rodríguez, A. M. (2021). Rasch model of the bridging social capital questionnaire. SSM - Population Health, 14, 100791. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssmph.2021.100791

Wahyono, P., Husamah, H., & Budi, A. S. (2020). Guru profesional di masa pandemi COVID-19: Review implementasi, tantangan, dan solusi pembelajaran daring. Jurnal Pendidikan Profesi Guru, 1(1), 51–65. http://ejournal.umm.ac.id/index.php/jppg/article/view/12462

Wahyu Hidayat, Fitri, U. R. B. (2020). THE ANALYSIS OF AUDITOR EMOTIONAL INTELLIGENCE USING THE RASCH MODEL. SEIKO : Journal of Management & Business, 3(3), 342–352.

Waugh, R. (2012). Applications of Rasch measurement in education. In Applications of Rasch Measurement in Education.

Widi, R. (2011). Uji Validitas dan Reliabilitas dalam Penelitian Epidemiologi Kedokteran Gigi. Stomatognatic (J.K.G. Unej) Vol., 8(1), 27–34.

Windiarsih, R., & Etikariena, A. (2018). Hubungan Antara Kepribadian Proaktif dan Perilaku Kerja Inovatif di BUMN X. Journal Psikogenesis, 5(2), 123. https://doi.org/10.24854/jps.v5i2.501

Wright, B. D., & Mok, M. M. C. (2004). An Overview of the Family of Rasch Measurement Models. Introduction to Rasch Measurement: Theory, Models and Applications, 1–24.

Wu, C., de Jong, J. P. J., Raasch, C., & Poldervaart, S. (2020). Work process-related lead userness as an antecedent of innovative behavior and user innovation in organizations. Research Policy, 49(6), 103986. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2020.103986

Wu, M., & Adams, R. (2007). APPLYING THE RASCH MODEL TO PSYCHO-SOCIAL MEASUREMENT A PRACTICAL APPROACH. Educational Measurement Solutions.

Yaghmal. (2003). Content validity and its estimation. Journal of Medical Education, 3(1), 25–27. https://doi.org/10.22037/jme.v3i1.870

Zehirlioglu, L., & Mert, H. (2020). Validity and reliability of the Heart Disease Fact Questionnaire (HDFQ): a Rasch measurement model approach. Primary Care Diabetes, 14(2), 154–160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pcd.2019.06.006

Zile-Tamsen, C. Van. (2017). Using Rasch Analysis to Inform Rating Scale. Research in Higher Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-017-9448-0

Zohrabi, M. (2013). Mixed Method Research: Instruments, Validity, Reliability and Reporting Findings. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 3(2), 254–262. https://doi.org/10.4304/tpls.3.2.254-262


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.