Manajemen komunikasi risiko dalam penanganan Covid-19 berbasis masyarakat

Abstract

Pandemi Covid-19 berdampak besar pada kesehatan, ekonomi, dan kehidupan sosial masyarakat. Komunikasi merupakan kunci keberhasilan mitigasi bencana, kesiapsiagaan, respon, dan pemulihan. Proses manajemen komunikasi risiko kepada masyarakat umum, pemerintah dan tokoh masyarakat, serta media dapat mengurangi risiko, menyelamatkan nyawa, harta benda, dan mempercepat pemulihan. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis mengenai strategi komunikasi risiko berbasis masyarakat di Provinsi Bali. Penelitian ini menggunkan metode deskriptif kualitatif. Teknik analisis data yang digunakan adalah reduksi data, penyajian data dan penarikan kesimpulan pada saat pra penelitian, selama penelitian, dan pasca penelitian. Pengambilan data dilakukan dengan cara melakukan observasi, wawancara, dan dokumen. Subjek penelitian adalah berbagai unsur yang terlibat dalam penanganan Covid-19 di Provinsi Bali. Hasil dari penelitian ini adalah pada situasi darurat kesehatan manajemen komunikasi risiko merupakan kunci dalam menghadapi risiko yang akan terjadi selama pandemi, kemudian diperlukan perencanaan komunikasi yang melibatkan langsung masyarakat, agar masyarakat dapat mengurangi risiko, dapat segera mengambil tindakan pencegahan dan perlindungan saat pandemi terjadi.
Keywords
  • Komunikasi risiko
  • masyarakat
  • pandemi Covid-19
References
  1. Abraham T. 2011. Lessons from the pandemic: the need for new tools for risk and outbreak communication. Emerging Health Threats Journal.4: 7160.
  2. Abrams EM, Greenhawt M. 2020. Risk communication during Covid-19.In Practice. 8 (6): 1791-1794.
  3. Agrawal A. 2009. Why "indigenous" knowledge?.Journal of the Royal Society of New Zealand. 39 (4): 157-158
  4. Ali T, Paton D, Buergelt PT, Smith JA, Jehan N, Siddique A. 2021. Integrating Indigenous perspectives and community-based disaster risk reduction: A pathway for sustainable Indigenous development in Northern Pakistan. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction. 59: 102263
  5. Barrelet C, Bourrier M, Jeangros CB, Schindler M. 2013. Unresolved issues in risk communication research: the case of the H1N1 pandemic (2009–2011). Influenza and Other Respiratory Viruses. 7(2): 114–119.
  6. [BPS] Badan Pusat Statistik Bali. 2020b. Pertumbuhan Ekonomi Bali Triwulan III. Bali (ID). Dapat diunduh pada: https://bali.bps.go.id [diakses 2020 Desember 15].
  7. [BPS] Badan Pusat Statistik Bali. 2020c. Hasil Survei Dampak Covid-19 Terhadap Sosial Demografi dan Pelaku Usaha Provinsi Bali 2020. Bali (ID). Dapat diunduh pada: https://bali.bps.go.id [diakses 2021 Januari 22].
  8. Berkes F, Berkes MK. 2009. Ecological complexity, fuzzy logic, and holism in indigenous knowledge. Futures.41: 6–12.
  9. Frewer L. 2004. The public and effective risk communication. Toxicology Letters. 149: 391–397.
  10. Glik D. 2007.Risk Communication for Public Health Emergencies. Public Health. 28:33–54.
  11. Heydari ST, Zarei L, Maryam A, Kamran BL, Ahmad KS, Najmeh M, Gholamhossin M. 2021.The effect of risk communication on preventive and protective Behaviours during the COVID-19 outbreak: mediating role of risk perception. BMC Public Health. 21:54.
  12. Ing LY and Basri MC. 2022. COVID-19 in Indonesia Impacts on the Economy and Ways to Recovery. New York (US); Routledge.
  13. Kar B and Cochran DM. 2019.Risk Communication and Community Resilience. New York (US); Routledge.
  14. Kurnio H, Fekete A, Naz F, Norf C. Jupner R. 2021. Resilience learning and indigenous knowledge of earthquake risk in Indonesia. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction. 62: 102423
  15. Maarif S. 2012. Pikiran dan Gagasan Penanggulangan Bencana di Indonesia. Jakarta (ID); BNPB
  16. Makondo CC, Thomas DSG. 2018. Climate change adaptation: Linking indigenous knowledge with western science for effective adaptation. Environmental Science and Policy. 88: 83-91.
  17. Malecki KM, Keating JA, Safdar N. 2021. Crisis Communication and Public Perception of COVID-19 Risk in the Era of Social Media. Department of Population Health Sciences. 72 (4): 699-704
  18. Lambert, SJ, Scott JC. 2019. International Disaster Risk Reduction Strategies and Indigenous Peoples. The International Indigenous Policy Journal. 10(2).
  19. Lestari P, Sularso. 2020. The Covid-19 impact crisis communication model using gending jawa local wisdom. International Journal of Communicaton and Society.2(1): 47-57.
  20. Okorafor CN. 2010. Challenges confronting libraries in documentation and communication of indigenous knowledge in Nigeria. The International Information & Library Review. 42: 8-13.
  21. Rumbach, A., and D. Foley. 2014. Indigenous institutions and their role in disaster risk reduction and resilience: evidence from the 2009 tsunami in American Samoa. Ecology and Society. 19(1): 19.
  22. Sugiyono. 2007. Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif Kualitatif dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.
  23. Sutton J, Renshaw SL, Butts CT. 2020. COVID-19: Retransmission of official communications in an emerging pandemic. PLOS ONE.15(9).
  24. Tambo E, Djuikoue CI, Tazemda GK, Fotsing MF, Zhou XN. 2021. Early stage risk communication and community engagement (RCCE) strategies and measures against the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic crisis. Global Health Journal. 5: 44-50.
  25. Villalobos C, Macias A, Avila MH, Cherit GD, Gatell HL, Aranda CA, and Rosales SP. 2017.The 2009 pandemic in Mexico: Experience and lessons regarding national preparedness policies for seasonal and epidemic influenza. Gaceta Médica de México. 153:102-10
  26. Warren GW, Lofstedt R. 2021. Risk communication and COVID-19 in Europe: lessons for future public health crises. Journal of Risk Research. 1-15.
  27. Wignjadiputro I, Widaningrum C, Setiawaty V, Wulandari EW, Sihombing S, Prasetyo WA, Azhar M, Rim KI, Junxiong VP, Waworuntu W, Subuh M. 2020. Whole–of–society approach for influenza pandemic epicenter Containment exercise in Indonesia.Journal of Infection and Public Health. 13 (7): 994-997.