Rasch analysis of student attributes: development and validation of scale to measure religious moderation

  • Zufriani Zufriani 
    Institut Agama Islam Negeri Kerinci
    Indonesia
  • Pitriani Pitriani
    Institut Agama Islam Negeri Kerinci
    Indonesia
  • Albertos Damni
    Institut Agama Islam Negeri Kerinci
    Indonesia

Abstract

In Indonesia, the narrative of Religious Moderation is being hotly discussed and has even been included in the RPJMN 2020-2024. The target index has been determined, but measurement instruments are still minimal and can be used to measure the level of religious moderation at the university level. This research was conducted in response to these needs. The development of this instrument uses a unidimensional construct using Rasch analysis. The number of samples used was 406 students selected using the multistage random sampling technique. This development goes through three stages, namely item generation,where the objectives and concepts of measuring religious moderation are arranged to produce latent items. The theoretical analysisaims to test the scale's content validity.The last stage is a psychometric analysiswhich seeks to analyze the availability of the sample and construct the validity and reliability of the scale using Rasch analysis. The first stage produced 48 statements; thesecond stage resulted in changes in the religious context and usedmore appropriate words to describe the scale interval. The last stage makes 24 valid argumentsto be sureof religious moderation.
References
  1. Abu-Raiya, H., & Hill, P. C. (2014). Appraising the state of measurement of Islamic religiousness. Psychology of Religion and Spirituality, 6(1), 22–32. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0035082
  2. Amir, Y. (2021). Pengembangan Skala Religiusitas untuk Subyek Muslim. Indonesian Journal for The Psychology of Religion, 1(1), 47–60. https://doi.org/10.24854/ijpr403
  3. Andrich, D. (2005). Rasch, Georg. Encyclopedia of Social Measurement, 299–306. https://doi.org/10.1016/B0-12-369398-5/00477-1
  4. Andrich, D. (2010). Rasch Models. International Encyclopedia of Education, 111–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-044894-7.00258-X
  5. Arif, M. K. (2020). Moderasi Islam (Wasathiyah Islam) Perspektif Al-Qur’an, As-Sunnah Serta Pandangan Para Ulama Dan Fuqaha. Al-Risalah, 11(1), 22–43. https://doi.org/10.34005/alrisalah.v11i1.592
  6. Bagi, B., Milenial, G., & An, Q. U. R. (2021). Konsep Internalisasi Nilai-Nilai Moderasi the Concept of Internalizing the Values of Religious. 4(1), 72–82.
  7. Barker, E. (2022). New Religious Movements. Encyclopedia of Violence, Peace, & Conflict, 339–353. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-820195-4.00286-7
  8. Bartholomew, D. J. (2015). Factor Analysis and Latent Structure Analysis: Overview. International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences: Second Edition, 691–697. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-097086-8.42043-X
  9. Berkes, F. (2017). Religious Traditions and Biodiversity. Reference Module in Life Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-809633-8.02335-9
  10. Bond, T. G., & Fox, C. M. (2013). Applying the Rasch Model. In Applying the Rasch Model. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410614575
  11. Bond, T. G., & Fox, C. M. (2015). Applying the Rasch Model. In Applying the Rasch model: Fundamental Measurement in the Human Sciences.
  12. Borsboom, D., & Molenaar, D. (2015). Psychometrics. International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences: Second Edition, 418–422. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-097086-8.43079-5
  13. Clark, L. A., & Watson, D. (1995). Constructing Validity: Basic Issues in Objective Scale Development. Psychological Assessment, 7(3), 309–319. https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.7.3.309.
  14. Cormack, R. (2001). Population Size Estimation and Capture–Recapture Methods. International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences, 11809–11813. https://doi.org/10.1016/B0-08-043076-7/00486-1
  15. Cresswell, J. (2009). Research Design: Pendekatan kualitatif, kuantitatif dan Mixed. Pustaka Pelajar.
  16. DeVellis, R. (2003). Scale Development: theory and application.
  17. Dubow, E. F., & Rubinlicht, M. (2011). Coping. Encyclopedia of Adolescence, 3, 109–118. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-373951-3.00107-1
  18. Engelhard, G., & Wind, S. A. (2019). Invariant Measurement with Raters and Rating Scales. In Invariant Measurement with Raters and Rating Scales. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315766829-14
  19. Ersanli, E., & Mameghani, S. S. (2016). Construct Validity and Reliability of the Tolerance Scale among Iranian College Students. Journal of Education and Practice, 7(34), 99–105. http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&AuthType=ip,cookie,url,uid&db=eric&AN=EJ1126670&amp%0Alang=es&site=ehost-live&scope=site
  20. Heise, D. R. (2015). Scaling and Classification in Social Measurement. International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences: Second Edition, 4–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-097086-8.44052-3
  21. Islam, R., & Bumi, D. (2016). RADIKALISME ISLAM DI BUMI NUSANTARA Sukarno L. Hasyim 1. Lentera, 1, 11–25.
  22. Juergensmeyer, M. (2015). Religious Nationalism and the Secular State. International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences: Second Edition, 401–405. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-097086-8.64006-0
  23. Junker, B. W. (2015). Factor Analysis and Latent Structure: IRT and Rasch Models. International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences: Second Edition, 698–702. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-097086-8.42126-4
  24. kementerian RI. (2019). Moderasi Beragama.
  25. Matthews, G., Zeidner, M., & Roberts, R. D. (2015). Coping, Personality and. International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences: Second Edition, 895–901. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-097086-8.25048-4
  26. Meneses, J., Barrios, M., Bonillo, A., Cosculluela, A., Lozano, L., Turbany, J., & Valero, S. (2013). Psicometría.
  27. Minakova, L. Y., & Gural, S. K. (2015). The Situational Context Effect in Non-Language-Majoring EFL Students’ Meaning Comprehension. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 200, 62–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SBSPRO.2015.08.014
  28. Nursiyono, J. A. (2015). Pengambilan Sampel. In Media.
  29. Schlösser, T., Dunning, D., Johnson, K. L., & Kruger, J. (2013). How unaware are the unskilled? Empirical tests of the “signal extraction” counterexplanation for the Dunning-Kruger effect in self-evaluation of performance. Journal of Economic Psychology, 39, 85–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2013.07.004
  30. Sumintono, B., & Widhiarso, W. (2014). Aplikasi Model Rasch untuk Penelitian Ilmu-Ilmu Sosial (edisi revisi).
  31. Supriadi, E., Ajib, G., & Sugiarso, S. (2020). Intoleransi dan Radikalisme Agama: Konstruk LSM tentang Program Deradikalisasi. JSW (Jurnal Sosiologi Walisongo), 4(1), 53–72. https://doi.org/10.21580/jsw.2020.4.1.4544
  32. Sutrisno, E. (2019). Aktualisasi Moderasi Beragama di Lembaga Pendidikan. Jurnal Bimas Islam, 12(2), 323–348. https://doi.org/10.37302/jbi.v12i2.113
  33. Untoro, V., & Putri, M. A. (2019). Status Identitas dan Toleransi Beragama pada Remaja. Jurnal Psikologi Teori Dan Terapan, 10(1), 46. https://doi.org/10.26740/jptt.v10n1.p46-59
  34. Van Der Linden, W. J. (2010). Item Response Theory. International Encyclopedia of Education, 81–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-044894-7.00250-5
  35. Willems, R. M., & Peelen, M. V. (2021). How context changes the neural basis of perception and language. IScience, 24(5), 102392. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ISCI.2021.102392

Downloads

PDF

Statistic

Abstract Views
: 624 times
PDF
: 7 times