Prospects of exercising teacher agency in facing students’ learning difficulties

Yuni Budi Lestari (1), Kamaludin Yusra (2), Nurachman Hanafi (3), Nawawi Nawawi (4),
(1) University of Mataram  Indonesia
(2) University of Mataram  Indonesia
(3) University of Mataram  Indonesia
(4) University of Mataram  Indonesia

Corresponding Author


DOI : https://doi.org/10.29210/020221464

Full Text:    Language : en

Abstract


Teacher agency is generally accepted as a strategy that teachers employ to face educational challenges. This article presents the result of a qualitative case study that examined learning difficulties that university students face during their study and prospects of exercising agency in facing the students’ learning difficulties. The current study was conducted at a postgraduate English department in a government University in West Nusa Tenggara. The participants of this study include three students in their third semester in the academic year 2020/2021 and three university English teachers who were purposively selected. Being qualitative in nature, this study used in-depth interviews with the students to obtain data on their learning difficulties. In-depth interviews were also conducted to the university English teachers to collect data on prospects of exercising their agency in dealing with learning difficulties facing the students. The collected data were then analyzed using the following steps: identifying, classifying, describing, and explaining. Data analysis indicated that the students experienced difficulties in reading and writing. The results of the study also revealed prospects of teacher agency exercise in helping students cope with their learning difficulties as enabled by specific conditions related to teachers’ pedagogical knowledge and teachers’ collaborative cultures.

Keywords


Prospects, Teacher agency, Students’ learning difficulties

References


Al-Badi, I. A. H. (2015). Academic writing difficulties of ESL learners. WEI International Academic Conference Proceedings, 63–76. http://www.westeastinstitute.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/Ibtisam-Ali-Hassan-Al-Badi-full-Paper.pdf

Alghail, A. A. A., & Mahfoodh, O. H. A. (2016). Academic reading difficulties encountered by international graduate students in a Malaysian university. Issues in Educational Research, 26(3), 369–386.

Ali, N. L., & Hamid, M. O. (2018). 13 English-medium instruction and teacher agency in higher education: A case study. Un(Intended) Language Planning in a Globalising World: Multiple Levels of Players at Work, 234–250. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110518269-013

Andrianatos, K. (2019). Barriers to reading in higher education: Rethinking reading support. Reading and Writing (South Africa), 10(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.4102/rw.v10i1.241

Argawati, N. O., & Suryani, L. (2020). Project-based Learning in teaching writing: the implementation and students’ opinion. English Review: Journal of English Education, 8(2), 55. https://doi.org/10.25134/erjee.v8i2.2120

Ayu, M. (2021). Applying text feature walks strategy in higher education to improve students’ reading comprehension. Journal of English Teaching, 7(3), 354-365. https://doi.org/10.33541/jet.v7i3.3077

Biesta, G., Priestley, M., & Robinson, S. (2017). Talking about education: exploring the significance of teachers’ talk for teacher agency. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 49(1), 38–54. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2016.1205143

Crowder, R. G. (2014). Principles of learning and memory: Classic edition. Psychology Press.

Evans, K. (2015). Bounded agency in professional lives. In M. Goller & S. Paloniemi (Eds.), Agency at work: An agentic perspective on professional learning and development (pp. 17–36). Springer International Publishing AG. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60943-0

Fenton-Smith, B., & Gurney, L. (2016). Actors and agency in academic language policy and planning. Current Issues in Language Planning, 17(1), 72–87. https://doi.org/10.1080/14664208.2016.1115323

Fook, C. Y., & Sidhu, G. K. (2015). Investigating learning challenges faced by students in higher education. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 186, 604–612. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.04.001

Hamid, M. O., & Nguyen, H. T. M. (2016). Globalization, English language policy, and teacher agency: Focus on Asia. International Education Journal, 15(1), 26–43.

Iwai, Y. (2016). The effect of explicit instruction on strategic reading in a Literacy methods course. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 28(1), 110–118. http://www.isetl.org/ijtlhe/

Jenkins, G. (2020). Teacher agency: the effects of active and passive responses to curriculum change. Australian Educational Researcher, 47(1), 167–181. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13384-019-00334-2

Lestari, Y. B. (2020). Integration of local texts and cultural practices in localised EFL classrooms: An ethnographic study of a rural Indonesian school [The University of Queensland]. https://doi.org/10.14264/1d72b10

Lestari, Y. B., Yusra, K., Arifuddin, A., & Susanti, N. W. M. (2021). English teachers’ responses to the new Indonesian education paradigm: A case study of Batu Layar English teachers’ consultative group. In Widhiyanto, F. Wuli, & A. Puji (Eds.), Proceedings of the 9th UNNES Virtual International Conference on English Language Teaching, Literature, and Translation (pp. 36–42). EAI. https://doi.org/10.4108/eai.14-11-2020.2311105

Liddicoat, A. J. (2014). The interface between macro and micro-level language policy and the place of language pedagogie. International Journal of Pedagogies and Learning, 9(2), 118–129.

Mckay, S. E. M. (2016). The Personal and contextual factors influencing teacher agency and self-efficacy when planning and implementing individual education plans. Massey University.

McNeill, A. (2017). Chapter 11. Native and non-native teachers’ sensitivity to language learning difficulties from a learner’s perspective: Implications and challenges for teacher education. Native and Non-Native Teachers in English Language Classrooms, 239–254. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781501504143-012

Merriam, S. B., & Tisdell, E. J. (2015). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation. Wiley.

Ng, P. C. L., & Boucher-Yip, E. F. (2017). Introduction. In P. C. . P.C.L. Ng & E. . Boucher-Yip (Eds.), Teacher agency and policy response in English language teachin (pp. 1–9). Routledge.

Pineteh, E. A. (2013). The Academic writing challenges of undergraduate students: A South African case study. International Journal of Higher Education, 3(1), 12–22. https://doi.org/10.5430/ijhe.v3n1p12

Pirttimaa, R., Takala, M., & Ladonlahti, T. (2015). Students in higher education with reading and writing difficulties. Education Inquiry, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.3402/edui.v6.24277

Schunk, D. H., & Zimmerman, B. J. (2012). Motivation and self-regulated learning theory, research, and applications (D. H. Schunk & B. J. Zimmerman (eds.)). Routledge.

Stake, R. . (2000). Case studies. In N. K. Denzin & Y. . Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative Research (pp. 435–453). Sage.

Zacharias, N. T. (2013). Navigating through the English-medium-of-instruction policy: Voices from the field. Current Issues in Language Planning, 14(1), 93–108. https://doi.org/10.1080/14664208.2013.782797

Zelazo, P. D., & Lyons, K. E. (2012). The potential benefits of mindfulness training in early childhood: A developmental social cognitive neuroscience perspective. Child Development Perspectives, 6(2), 154–160. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1750-8606.2012.00241.x


Article Metrics

 Abstract Views : 425 times
 PDF Downloaded : 0 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.