Word of mouth sebagai dampak student satisfaction pada sys-tem quality dan information quality dalam masa pandemi Covid 19

Kartika Imasari Tjiptodjojo (1),
(1)   Indonesia

Corresponding Author


DOI : https://doi.org/10.29210/020221668

Full Text:    Language : id

Abstract


Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis word of mouth sebagai dampak student satisfaction pada system quality dan information quality dalam masa pandemi Covid 19. Pengumpulan data dilakukan dengan survei. Metode yang digunakan adalah non probability sampling dengan teknik purposive sampling. Sampel dalam penelitian ini adalah mahasiswa pada Perguruan Tinggi Swasta dengan akreditasi A atau Unggul di Kota Bandung yang telah menempuh pendidikan minimal 1 (satu) semester sebanyak 200 responden. Metode analisis data yang digunakan adalah Structural Equation Modeling (SEM). Hasil dari penelitian menunjukkan bahwa terdapat pengaruh system quality terhadap student satisfaction, terdapat pengaruh information quality terhadap student satisfaction serta terdapat pengaruh student satisfaction terhadap word of mouth.

References


Al-Mamary, Y. H., Shamsuddin, A., & Aziati, N. (2014). The relationship between system quality, information quality, and organizational performance. International Journal of Knowledge and Research in Management & E-Commerce, 4(3), 7–10.

DeLone, W. H., & R, M. (2003). Model of information systems success: a ten-year update. Journal of Management Information Systems, 19(4), 9–30. https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.2003.11045748

Dora, Y. M., Lisdayanti, A., & Borshalina, T. (2019). Word of mouth implications of service quality mediated student satisfaction: a study on a private university in bandung. Journal of Advanced Research in Dynamical and Control Systems, 11(03), 1049–1055.

Giantari, I. G. A. K., Yasa, N. N. K., Sukawati, T. G. R., & Setini, M. (2021). Student satisfaction and perceived value on word of mouth (WOM) during the covid-19 pandemic: an empirical study in indonesia. Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 8(6), 1047–1056. https://doi.org/10.13106/jafeb.2021.vol8.no6.1047

Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2019). Multivariate data analysis (8 ed.). Cengage Learning.

Kemenristekdikti. (2019). Statistik pendidikan tinggi. https://pddikti.kemdikbud.go.id/asset/data/publikasi/Statistik Pendidikan Tinggi Indonesia 2019.pdf

Kemenristekdikti. (2020). Statistik pendidikan tinggi.

Krisdiantoro, Y., Subekti, I., & Prihatiningtias, Y. W. (2018). Pengaruh kualitas sistem dan kualitas informasi terhadap manfaat bersih dengan intensitas penggunaan sebagai variabel mediasi. Jurnal Akuntansi Aktual, 5(2), 149–167. http://journal2.um.ac.id/index.php/jaa/article/view/4536/pdf

Kumar, A., & Lata, S. (2021). The system quality and customer satisfaction with website quality as mediator in online purchasing: a developing country perspectives. Journal of Operations and Strategic Planning, 4(1), 7–26. https://doi.org/10.1177/2516600X21991945

Kundu, S., & Raja, C. R. S. (2017). Word of mouth: a literature review. International Journal of Economics & Management Sciences, 6(6), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.4172/2162-6359.1000467

Muda, I., & Afrina, E. A. (2019). No Title. Contaduría y Administración, 64(2).

Palmer, J., Eidson, V., Haliemun, C., & Wiewel, P. (2011). Predictors of positive and negative word of mouth of university students: strategic implications for institutions of higher education. International Journal of Business and Social Science, 2(7), 59–62. http://works.bepress.com/john-palmer/4/

Purwanto, S. K., & Pawirosumarto, S. (2017). Pengaruh kualitas sistem, kualitas informasi, dan kualitas layanan terhadap penggunaan sisteme-learning di program pascasarjana universitas mercu buana. Jurnal Manajemen, XXI(02), 282–305. https://doi.org/10.22441/jurnal_mix

Sekaran, U., & Bougie, R. (2016). Research methods for business: a skill-building approach (7 ed.). John Wiley & Sons.

Song, J., Migliaccio, G. C., Wang, G., & Lu, H. (2017). Exploring the influence of system quality, information quality, and external service on BIM user satisfaction. Journal of Management in Engineering, 33(6). https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000549

Syah, T. Y. R., & Wijoyo, C. K. (2021). Service quality and customer satisfaction on WOM a private hospital in indonesia. Jurnal Medicoeticolegal dan Manajemen Rumah Sakit, 10(1), 22–34. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.18196/jmmr.v10i1.10141

Taghizadeh, H., Taghipourian, M. J., & Khazaei, A. (2012). The effect of customer satisfaction on word of mouth communication. Research Journal of Applied Sciences, Engineering and Technology, 5(7), 2569–2575. https://doi.org/10.19026/RJASET.5.4698

Tani, A., Saldanha, E. de S., & Barreto, D. M. B. (2021). The role of customer satisfaction on the relationship between service quality, price and word of mouth (WOM): the experience of EDTL.EP in dili, timor-leste. Timor-Leste Journal of Business and Management, 3(2), 1–16. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.51703/bm.v3i2.53

Teo, R., & Soutar, G. N. (2012). Word of mouth antecedents in an educational context: a singaporean study. International Journal of Educational Management, 26(7), 678–695. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/09513541211263746

Pendidikan tinggi, Pub. L. No. 12 (2012). http://diktis.kemenag.go.id/prodi/dokumen/UU-Nomor-12-Tahun-2012-ttg-Pendidikan-Tinggi.pdf.

Widhoroso. (2021). Pandemi covid-19 turunkan jumlah mahasiswa baru PTS. https://mediaindonesia.com/humaniora/425119/pandemi-covid-19-turunkan-jumlah-mahasiswa-baru-pts

Widiastuti, R., Haryono, B. S., & Said, A. (2019). Influence on system quality, information quality, service quality on user acceptance and satisfaction and its impact on net benefits. (study of information system users lecturer performance load (BKD) in malang state university). HOLISTICA, 10(3), 111‐132. https://doi.org/10. 2478/hjbpa‐2019‐0032

Wolf, E. J., Harrington, K. M., Clark, S. L., & Miller, M. W. (2013). Sample size requirements for structural equation models: an evaluation of power, bias, and solution pro-priety. Educational and Psychological Measurement (EPM), 76(6), 913–934. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164413495237


Article Metrics

 Abstract Views : 327 times
 PDF Downloaded : 0 times

Refbacks