Ekspropriasi multiple largeshareholders dan nilai perusahaan: pengujian mediasi kebijakan dividen

Abstract

Peningkatan nilai perusahaan sebagai tujuan perusahaan merupakan gambaran dari peningkatan kesejahteraan untuk shareholders melalui dividen yang dibayarkan. Dalam proses pendelegasian wewenang ini, sering dijumpai beberapa persoalan yang berhubungan dengan konflik diantara pemegang saham dan para pelaksana. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menguji dan menganalisis pengaruh ekspropriasi dan multiple large shareholders terhadap nilai perusahaan yang dimediasi kebijakan dividen. Jenis penelitian yang digunakan adalah kuantitatif eksplanatif dengan mengguanakan data sekunder yaitu annual report tahun 2015 sampai tahun 2020 yang diambil dari website resmi Bursa Efek Indonesia (BEI), Indonesian Capital Market Exchange (ICMD) dan website www.investing.com. Metode pengambilan sampel pada penelitian ini adalah purposive sampling sehingga didapatkansampel sebanyak 3.351 data amatan. Metode analisis data yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini menggunakan metode analisis jalur unbalanced data paneldengan program software Eviews. Hasil penelitian membuktikan bahwa ekspropriasi tidak berpengaruh terhadap nilai perusahaan. Hal ini berarti related party transactionssebagai proksi yang dipakai tidak bisa dijadikan patokan dalam menilai sebuah perusahaan.
Keywords
  • ekspropriasi
  • multiple large shareholders
  • kebijakan dividen
  • nilai perusahaan
References
  1. Adelopo, I., Olumuyiwa, Y. G., & Rufai, I. (2019). The impacts of multiple large ownership structure on board independence. International Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Performance Evaluation, 15(1), 1–30.
  2. Aharony, J., Wang, J., & Yuan, H. (2010). Tunneling as an incentive for earnings management during the IPO process in China. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 29(1), 1–26.
  3. Aji, T. S. (2017). Pengaruh Kebijakan Dividen, Kebijakan Hutang, Ukuran Perusahaan, Dan Keputusan Investasi Terhadap Nilai Perusahaan Di Bei Periode 2011- 2015. Jurnal Ilmu Manajemen Volume 5 Nomor 4.
  4. Anastasia, O. C., & Onuora, J. (2019). Effects of Related Party Transaction on Financial Performance of Companies, Evidenced by Study of Listed Companies in Nigeria. International Journal Of Economics And Financial Management, 4(3), 46–57.
  5. Angeldorff, S., & Novikov, K. (1999). Agency costs: ownership concentration’s influence over dividend levels–An empirical study of the Stockholm Stock Market 1990–1997. Unpublished Master’s Thesis in Finance, Stockholm School of Economics.
  6. Anggraeni, Haryono Selly, F. dan, & Fatimah, E. (2015). Analisis pengaruh Struktur Modal dan Struktur Kepemilikan Terhadap Nilai Perusahaan. Simposium Akuntansi Nasional 18. 18 September, Halaman 1-23.
  7. Bennedsen, M., Kongsted, H. C., & Nielsen, K. M. (2008). The causal effect of board size in the performance of small and medium-sized firms. Journal of Banking & Finance, 32(6), 1098–1109.
  8. Cardoso, G. F. (2001). Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia Yogyakarta Andi Offset.
  9. Cheng, L. T. W., & Leung, T. Y. (2016). Government protection, political connection and management turnover in China. International Review of Economics & Finance, 45, 160–176.
  10. Cheung, M. Y., Luo, C., Sia, C. L., & Chen, H. (2009). Credibility of electronic word-of-mouth: Informational and normative determinants of on-line consumer recommendations. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 13(4), 9–38.
  11. Cheung, Y.-L., Rau, P. R., & Stouraitis, A. (2006). Tunneling, propping, and expropriation: Evidence from connected party transactions in Hong Kong. Journal of Financial Economics, 82(2), 343–386.
  12. Chiu, K.-H., & Hsu, C.-L. (2010). Research on the connections between corporate social responsibility and corporation image in the risk society: Take the mobile telecommunication industry as an example. International Journal of Electronic Business Management, 8(3), 183.
  13. Choe, C., & Matsushima, N. (2013). The arm’s length principle and tacit collusion. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 31(1), 119–130.
  14. Claessens, S., Djankov, S., Fan, J. P. H., & Lang, L. H. P. (2002). Disentangling the incentive and entrenchment effects of large shareholdings. The Journal of Finance, 57(6), 2741–2771.
  15. Claessens, S., Djankov, S., & Lang, L. H. P. (2000). The separation of ownership and control in East Asian corporations. Journal of Financial Economics, 58(1–2), 81–112.
  16. Derek-Teshun, H., & Zhien-Chia, L. (2010). A study of the relationship between related party transactions and firm value in high technology firms in Taiwan and China. African Journal of Business Management, 4(9), 1924–1931.
  17. Faccio, M., & Lang, L. H. P. (2002). The ultimate ownership of Western European corporations. Journal of Financial Economics, 65(3), 365–395.
  18. Faccio, M., Lang, L. H. P., & Young, L. (2001). Dividends and expropriation. American Economic Review, 91(1), 54–78.
  19. Fakhriyyah, D. D., Purnomosidhi, B., & Subekti, I. (2017). Pengaruh Tata Kelola terhadap Praktik Ekspropriasi dengan Kebijakan Dividen sebagai Variabel Pemoderasi. Mix: Jurnal Ilmiah Manajemen, 7(3), 224245.
  20. Gayatri, N. L. P. R., & Mustanda, I. K. (2014). Pengaruh struktur modal, kebijakan dividen dan keputusan investasi terhadap Nilai perusahaan. Udayana University.
  21. Ghozali. (2016). Aplikasi Analisis Multivariete Dengan Program IBM SPSS. Semarang: Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro.
  22. Ghozali, I., & Ratmono, D. (2017). Analisis multivariat dan ekonometrika: teori, konsep, dan aplikasi dengan eview 10.
  23. Glaeser, E., Johnson, S., & Shleifer, A. (2001). Coase versus the Coasians. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 116(3), 853–899.
  24. Gomes, A. R., & Novaes, W. (2005). Sharing of control as a corporate governance mechanism. Available at SSRN 277111.
  25. Gordon, M. J. (1963). Optimal investment and financing policy. The Journal of Finance, 18(2), 264–272.
  26. Hastriyana, A., & Taqwa, S. (2019). Pengaruh Multiple Large Shareholder Terhadap Nilai Perusahaan. Jurnal Eksplorasi Akuntansi, 1(3), 1080–1095.
  27. Hemastuti, C. P., & Hermanto, S. B. (2014). Pengaruh profitabilitas, kebijakan dividen, kebijakan hutang, keputusan investasi dan kepemilikan insider terhadap nilai perusahaan. Jurnal Ilmu & Riset Akuntansi, 3(4), 1–15.
  28. Isakov, D., & Weisskopf, J.-P. (2015). Pay-out policies in founding family firms. Journal of Corporate Finance, 33, 330–344.
  29. Jensen, M. C. (1986). Agency costs of free cash flow, corporate finance, and takeovers. The American Economic Review, 76(2), 323–329.
  30. Jian, M. (2003). Earnings management and tunneling through related party transactions: Evidence from Chinese corporate groups. Hong Kong University of Science and Technology (Hong Kong).
  31. Kang, B. (2014). Corporate social responsibility perceptions and corporate performances. Journal of Applied Sciences, 14(21), 2662–2673.
  32. Koetaman, E., & Diyanty, V. (2013). Pengaruh Kepemilikan Pengendali Akhir terhadap Kebijakan Dividen Kas dengan Kepemilikan Keluarga dan Mekanisme Corporate Governance sebagai Variabel Moderasi [The Influence of Final Control Ownership on Cash Dividend Policy with Family Ownership and Corporate Governance Mechanism as Moderating Variables]. National Symposium Accounting, 16.
  33. Lehmann, E., & Weigand, J. (2000). Does the governed corporation perform better? Governance structures and corporate performance in Germany. Review of Finance, 4(2), 157–195.
  34. Lin, Y. R., & Fu, X. M. (2017). Does institutional ownership influence firm performance? Evidence from China. International Review of Economics & Finance, 49, 17–57.
  35. Maury, B., & Pajuste, A. (2005). Multiple large shareholders and firm value. Journal of Banking & Finance, 29(7), 1813–1834.
  36. Okoro, E. G., & Okoye, E. I. (2016). Taming creative accounting via international financial reporting standards: The Nigerian scenario. Business Trends, 6(4), 11–17.
  37. Pagano, M., & Röell, A. (1998). The choice of stock ownership structure: Agency costs, monitoring, and the decision to go public. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 113(1), 187–225.
  38. Rusdiana, A., Irfan, M., & Irfan, M. (2014). Sistem informasi manajemen. Pustaka Setia.
  39. Sari, D.A., Edyanus, H.H., dan A. F. F. (2014). Pengaruh Mekanisme Good Corporate Governance dan Financial Distress Terhadap Earning Management Pada Perusahaan Manufaktur Yang Terdaftar Di BEI. Jurnal Ilmiah Akuntansi, Vol. 1, No. 1, Univeraitas Riau.
  40. Satriawan, H. B., & Agustina, L. (2016). Determinan Harga Saham dengan Nilai Perusahaan sebagai Variabel Intervening. Accounting Analysis Journal, 5(2), 113–121.
  41. Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. W. (1997). A survey of corporate governance. The Journal of Finance, 52(2), 737–783.
  42. Sofyaningsih, S., & Hardiningsih, P. (2011). Struktur kepemilikan, kebijakan dividen, kebijakan utang dan nilai perusahaan. Dinamika Keuangan Dan Perbankan, 3(1), 68–87.
  43. Su, Z., Fung, H.-G., Huang, D., & Shen, C.-H. (2014). Cash dividends, expropriation, and political connections: Evidence from China. International Review of Economics & Finance, 29, 260–272.
  44. Utama, S., Utama, C. A., & Yuniasih, R. (2010). Related party transaction-efficient or abusive: Indonesia evidence. Asia Pacific Journal of Accounting and Finance, 1(1), 77–102.
  45. Volpin, P. F. (2002). Governance with poor investor protection: Evidence from top executive turnover in Italy. Journal of Financial Economics, 64(1), 61–90.
  46. Wardani, D. K., & Putri, H. N. S. (2018). Pengaruh Faktor Internal dan Faktor Eksternal terhadap Manajemen Pajak. Akmenika: Jurnal Akuntansi Dan Manajemen, 15(1).
  47. Wiagustini, N. L. P. (2014). Manajemen keuangan (J. Atmaja (ed.); 1st ed.). Udayana.
  48. Wijaya, B. I., & Sedana, I. B. P. (2015). Pengaruh profitabilitas terhadap nilai perusahaan (kebijakan dividen dan kesempatan investasi sebagai variabel mediasi). Udayana University.
  49. Wong, R. M. K., Kim, J., & Lo, A. W. Y. (2015). Are related‐party sales value‐adding or value‐destroying? Evidence from China. Journal of International Financial Management & Accounting, 26(1), 1–38.
  50. Ying, Q., & Wang, L. (2013). Propping by controlling shareholders, wealth transfer and firm performance: Evidence from Chinese listed companies. China Journal of Accounting Research, 6(2), 133–147.