Financial statement fraud based on Hexagon Fraud Approach

  • Prima Apriwenni 
    Kwik Kian Gie School of Business
    Indonesia
  • Elis Sondang Dasawati
    Kwik Kian Gie School of Business
    Indonesia
  • Chrysolyte Thalia Abigail
    Kwik Kian Gie School of Business
    Indonesia

Abstract

This study aims to determine the effect of fraud hexagons on fraudulent financial statements. The objects of this research are food and beverage companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange for the 2017-2019 period. The sampling technique used was purposive sampling with a total of 13 companies. The data analysis techniques are descriptive statistics, classical assumption tests, and multiple linear regression analyses. The results of this study indicate that financial targets, financial stability, changes in directors, and ineffective monitoring have not proven to have a positive effect on fraudulent financial reporting. Political Connection, Total Accruals, and CEO Duality have positively affected fraudulent financial statements. So that in this way, the company can provide financial reporting information properly, follow field conditions, and comply with the ethics and standards set by the relevant authorities.
Keywords
  • Fraud hexagon
  • Financial statement
  • Financial statement fraud
References
  1. Ade Citra. (2023). Pendeteksian Kecurangan Laporan Keuangan Melalui Pendekatan Fraud Hexagonal: Studi Empiris Pada Bank Bumn Yang Terdaftar Di Bursa Efek Indonesia Tahun 2010-2019. Universitas Lampung.
  2. Agusputri, H., & Sofie, S. (2019). Faktor-Faktor Yang Berpengaruh Terhadap Fraudulent Financial Reporting Dengan Menggunakan Analisis Fraud Pentagon. Jurnal Informasi, Perpajakan, Akuntansi, Dan Keuangan Publik, 14(2), 105–124.
  3. Aicpa. (2002). Au Section 316 Consideration Of Fraud In A Financial Statement Audit. Statements Of Auditing Standards No. 99, 167–218.
  4. Annisya, M., & Asmaranti, Y. (2016). Pendeteksian Kecurang Laporan Keuangan Menggunakan Fraud Diamond. Jurnal Bisnis Dan Ekonomi, 23(1).
  5. Apriliana, S., & Agustina, L. (2017). The Analysis Of Fraudulent Financial Reporting Determinant Through Fraud Pentagon Approach. Jurnal Dinamika Akuntansi, 9(2), 154–165. Https://Doi.Org/Https://Doi.Org/10.15294/Jda.V7i1.4036
  6. Association Of Certified Fraud Examiners (Acfe) Indonesia. (2019). Survei Fraud Indonesia 2019. Indonesia Chapter #111, 53(9), 1–76.
  7. Aviantara, R. (2021). The Association Between Fraud Hexagon And Government’s Fraudulent Financial Report. Asia Pacific Fraud Journal, 6(1), 26-42, 6, 26–42. Https://Doi.Org/10.21532/Apfjournal.V6i1.192
  8. Chantia, D., Guritno, Y., & Sari, R. (2021). Detection Of Fraudulent Financial Statement: Fraud Hexagon Sccore Model Approach. Prosiding Biema (Business Management, Economic, And Accounting National Seminar), 2, 594–613.
  9. Fajrian, H. (2020). Tps Food Sajikan Ulang Lapkeu 2017, Rugi Membengkak Jadi Rp 5 Triliun. Katadata.Co.Id. Https://Katadata.Co.Id/Happyfajrian/Finansial/5e9a495cb39ca/Tps-Food-Sajikan-Ulang-Lapkeu-2017-Rugi-Membengkak-Jadi-Rp-5-Triliun
  10. Hadi, M. S. W., Kirana, D. J., & Wijayanti, A. (2021). Pendeteksian Fraudulent Financial Reporting Dengan Fraud Hexagon Pada Perusahaan Di Indonesia. Prosiding Biema (Business Management, Economic, And Accounting National Seminar), 2, 1036–1052.
  11. Imtikhani, L., & Sukirman, S. (2021). Determinan Fraudulent Financial Statement Melalui Perspektif Fraud Hexagon Theory Pada Perusahaan Pertambangan. Jurnal Akuntansi Bisnis, 19(1), 96–113.
  12. Jannah, V. M., Andreas, A., & Rasuli, M. (2021). Pendekatan Vousinas Fraud Hexagon Model Dalam Mendeteksi Kecurangan Pelaporan Keuangan. Studi Akuntansi Dan Keuangan Indonesia, 4(1), 1–16.
  13. Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory Of The Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs And Ownership Structure. Journal Of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305–360.
  14. Kusumosari, L., & Solikhah, B. (2021). Analisis Kecurangan Laporan Keuangan Melalui Fraud Hexagon Theory. Fair Value: Jurnal Ilmiah Akuntansi Dan Keuangan, 4(3), 753–767.
  15. Larum, K., Zuhroh, D., & Subiyantoro, E. (2021). Fraudulent Financial Reporting: Menguji Potensi Kecurangan Pelaporan Keuangan Dengan Menggunakan Teori Fraud Hexagon. Accounting And Financial Review, 4(1), 82–94.
  16. Lionardi, M., & Suhartono, S. (2022). Pendeteksian Kemungkinan Terjadinya Fraudulent Financial Statement Menggunakan Fraud Hexagon. Moneter: Jurnal Akuntansi Dan Keuangan, 9(1), 29–38.
  17. Meidijati, M., & Amin, M. N. A. (2022). Detecting Fraudulent Financial Reporting Through Hexagon Fraud Model: Moderating Role Of Income Tax Rate. International Journal Of Social And Management Studies, 3(2), 311–322.
  18. Rahayuningsih, B., & Sukirman, S. (2021). Determinan Fraudulent Financial Statement Dalam Perspektif Fraud Pentagon Theory. Jurnal Akuntansi Bisnis, 19(2), 162–182.
  19. Ratnasari, E., & Solikhah, B. (2019). Analisis Kecurangan Laporan Keuangan: Pendekatan Fraud Pentagon Theory. Gorontalo Accounting Journal, 2(2), 98–112.
  20. Siregar, S. (2013). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif: Dilengkapi Dengan Perhitungan Manual & Spss.
  21. Situngkir, N. C., & Triyanto, D. N. (2020). Detecting Fraudulent Financial Reporting Using Fraud Score Model And Fraud Pentagon Theory: Empirical Study Of Companies Listed In The Lq 45 Index. The Indonesian Journal Of Accounting Research, 23(3), 373–410.
  22. Skousen, C. J., Smith, K. R., & Wright, C. J. (2009). Detecting And Predicting Financial Statement Fraud: The Effectiveness Of The Fraud Triangle And Sas No. 99. In Corporate Governance And Firm Performance. Emerald Group Publishing Limited. Https://Doi.Org/Https://Doi.Org/10.1108/S1569-3732(2009)0000013005
  23. Sugiyono. (2019). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, Dan R & D. Bandung: Cv Alfabeta.
  24. Ujiyantho, M. A. Dan B. A. P. (2007). Mekanisme Corporate Governance, Manajeme Laba Dan Kinerja Keuangan. Sna X. Prosiding Simposium Nasional Akuntansi 10. Makassar.
  25. Vousinas, G. L. (2019). Advancing Theory Of Fraud: The Score Model. Journal Of Financial Crime, 26(1), 372–381.
  26. Yang, D., Jiao, H., & Buckland, R. (2017). The Determinants Of Financial Fraud In Chinese Firms: Does Corporate Governance As An Institutional Innovation Matter? Technological Forecasting And Social Change, 125, 309–320.

Downloads

PDF

Statistic

Abstract Views
: 996 times
PDF
: 8 times