The effect of flipped digital classroom method using moodle and student engagement on reading comprehension

Abstract

English is a very urgent subject in academic life. In order to improve reading comprehension skills, teachers need to use online learning during the COVID-19 pandemic. This method is to provide space for students to study independently online. This study aimed to analyze the effect of the flipped digital classroom method using Moodle e-learning material and students’ engagement on students’ reading comprehension skills. This research used a quantitative approach with a quasi-experimental design. The instruments used in this research were observation sheets, questionnaires, and reading comprehension tests. The data analysis used Two Way ANOVA.  The results showed that the flipped digital classroom method using Moodle and student engagement affect reading comprehension skills. English lecturers should apply this method by building a pleasant online learning atmosphere so that student engagement and reading comprehension skills increase.
Keywords
  • flipped digital classroom
  • moodle
  • student engagement
  • reading comprehension
References
  1. Abaeian, H., & Samadi, L. (2016). The effect of flipped classroom on Iranian EFL learners’ L2 reading comprehension: Focusing on different proficiency levels. Journal of Applied Linguistics and Language Research, 3(6), 295–304.
  2. Abid, S. O. (2020). The effect of hot seat strategy on the 1st intermediate students’ reading comprehension. Cypriot Journal of Educational Sciences, 15(5), 1089–1098.
  3. Akkara, S., Anumula, V., & Mallampalli, M. (2020). Impact of whatsapp interaction on improving L2 speaking skills. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (IJET), 15(3), 250–259.
  4. Al-Qahtani, A. A. (2020). Investigating metacognitive think-aloud strategy in improving saudi EFL Learners’ reading comprehension and attitudes. English Language Teaching, 13(9), 50–62.
  5. Alfawareh, H. M., & Jusoh, S. (2014). Smartphones usage among university students: Najran University case. International Journal of Academic Research, 6(2).
  6. Almarzooq, Z. I., Lopes, M., & Kochar, A. (2020). Virtual learning during the COVID-19 pandemic: a disruptive technology in graduate medical education. American College of Cardiology Foundation Washington DC.
  7. Alsowat, H. (2016). An EFL flipped classroom teaching model: Effects on English language higher-order thinking skills, student engagement and satisfaction. Journal of Education and Practice, 7(9), 108–121.
  8. Asmara, R. (2020). Teaching english in a virtual classroom using whatsapp during COVID-19 pandemic. Language and Education Journal, 5(1), 16–27.
  9. Bahasoan, A. N., Ayuandiani, W., Mukhram, M., & Rahmat, A. (2020). Effectiveness of online learning in pandemic COVID-19. International Journal of Science, Technology & Management, 1(2), 100–106.
  10. Bataineh, R. F., & Al-Sakal, R. M. I. (2021). To flip or not to flip: Potential effects on EFL reading comprehension. International Journal of Curriculum and Instruction, 13(2), 1091–1108.
  11. Binti Mistar, I., & Embi, M. A. (2016). Students ‘perception on the use of WhatsApp as a learning tool in ESL classroom. Journal of Education and Social Sciences, 4, 96–104.
  12. Borich, G. D. (2016). Observation skills for effective teaching: research-based practice. Routledge.
  13. Brown, L. T., Mohr, K. A. J., Wilcox, B. R., & Barrett, T. S. (2018). The effects of dyad reading and text difficulty on third-graders’ reading achievement. The Journal of Educational Research, 111(5), 541–553.
  14. Connor, C. M., Lara J, J., Crowe, E. C., & Meadows, J. G. (2009). Instruction, student engagement, and reading skill growth in Reading First classrooms. The Elementary School Journal, 109(3), 221–250.
  15. Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2016). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. Sage publications.
  16. Fadi, A.-K. (2019). The impact of vocabulary knowledge on the reading comprehension of saudi EFL learners. Journal of Language and Education, 5(3 (19)).
  17. Fulgueras, M. J., & Bautista, J. (2020). Flipped classroom: Its effects on ESL learners’ critical thinking and reading comprehension levels. International Journal of Language and Literary Studies, 2(3), 257–270.
  18. Gilboy, M. B., Heinerichs, S., & Pazzaglia, G. (2015). Enhancing student engagement using the flipped classroom. Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior, 47(1), 109–114.
  19. Guszak, F. J. (1967). Teacher questioning and reading. The Reading Teacher, 21(3), 227–234.
  20. Guthrie, J. T., & Klauda, S. L. (2014). Effects of classroom practices on reading comprehension, engagement, and motivations for adolescents. Reading Research Quarterly, 49(4), 387–416.
  21. Hamilton, B. E., Martin, J. A., Osterman, M. J., Driscoll, A. K., & Rossen, L. M. (2019). Vital statistics rapid release. Birth, 35, 39.
  22. Hart, S. R., Stewart, K., & Jimerson, S. R. (2011). The student engagement in schools questionnaire (SESQ) and the teacher engagement report form-new (TERF-N): Examining the preliminary evidence. Contemporary School Psychology: Formerly" The California School Psychologist", 15(1), 67–79.
  23. Hasanah, I., & Arifani, Y. (2020). The effect of flipped classroom toward ESP students reading comprehension.
  24. Hellman, D. S., & Milling, S. (2020). Social emotional learning in arts teacher education policy: a content analysis of assurance standards and course descriptions. Arts Education Policy Review, 1–11.
  25. Herlindayana, H., Sahlan, S., & Alberth, A. (2017). The effect of flipped classroom on students’ reading comprehension. Journal of Language Education and Educational Technology (JLEET), 2(1).
  26. Huang, Y.-N., & Hong, Z.-R. (2016). The effects of a flipped English classroom intervention on students’ information and communication technology and English reading comprehension. Educational Technology Research and Development, 64(2), 175–193.
  27. Hung, C.-Y., Sun, J. C.-Y., & Liu, J.-Y. (2019). Effects of flipped classrooms integrated with MOOCs and game-based learning on the learning motivation and outcomes of students from different backgrounds. Interactive Learning Environments, 27(8), 1028–1046.
  28. Ja’afar, H., Othman, W. M., Kesevan, H. V., & Budi, M. S. (2021). Enhancing oral reading fluency (ORF) through computer assisted repeated reading (CARR). Asian Journal of University Education, 17(1), 207–221.
  29. Karabiyik, C. (2019). The relationship between student engagement and tertiary level english language learners’ achievement. International Online Journal of Education and Teaching, 6(2), 281–293.
  30. Kawinkoonlasate, P. (2019). Integration in flipped classroom technology approach to develop English language skills of Thai EFL learners. English Language Teaching, 12(11), 23–34.
  31. Kvashnina, O. S., & Martynko, E. A. (2016). Analyzing the potential of flipped classroom in ESL teaching. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (IJET), 11(03), 71–73.
  32. McElhone, D. (2012). Tell us more: Reading comprehension, engagement, and conceptual press discourse. Reading Psychology, 33(6), 525–561.
  33. Mik, F. (2019). The effects of collaborative note-taking in flipped learning contexts. Journal of Language and Education, 5(4 (20)).
  34. Mohd, I. H., Hussein, N., Aluwi, A. H., & Omar, M. K. (2016). Enhancing students engagement through blended learning satisfaction and lecturer support. 2016 IEEE 8th International Conference on Engineering Education (ICEED), 175–180.
  35. Neisi, L., Hajijalili, M., & Namaziandost, E. (2019). The impact of using inverted classrooms on promoting extensive versus intensive reading comprehension among Iranian upper-intermediate EFL learners. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 9(12), 1513–1523.
  36. Phothongsunan, S. (2020). Student and teacher engagement in learning and assessment with portfolios. Cypriot Journal of Educational Sciences, 15(6), 1569–1573.
  37. Risnanda, R. (2018). Cognitive level of reading questions in english textbook for senior high school. UMSU.
  38. Santosa, P. I. (2015). Student engagement with online tutorial: A perspective on flow theory. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (IJET), 10(1), 60–67.
  39. Sencibaugh, J. M., & Sencibaugh, A. M. (2015). The effects of questioning the author on the reading comprehension of middle school students. Reading Improvement, 52(3), 85–92.
  40. Sim, S. P.-L., Sim, H. P.-K., & Quah, C.-S. (2021). Online learning: A post Covid-19 alternative pedagogy for university students. Asian Journal of University Education, 16(4), 137–151.
  41. Sin, S. L., & Siahpoosh, H. (2020). Looking at the impact of the flipped classroom model on reading comprehension of Iranian EFL learners. Arabic Language, Literature & Culture, 5(2), 14.
  42. Strayer, J. F. (2016). Designing instruction for flipped classrooms. In Instructional-Design Theories and Models, Volume IV (pp. 321–350). Routledge.
  43. Syafitri, W. (2014). The impact of flipped classroom on reading comprehension of high school students with different learning styles. Disertasi Dan Tesis Program Pascasarjana Um.
  44. Verawardina, U., Asnur, L., Lubis, A. L., Hendriyani, Y., Ramadhani, D., Dewi, I. P., Darni, R., Betri, T. J., Susanti, W., & Sriwahyuni, T. (2020). Reviewing online learning facing the COVID-19 outbreak. Talent Development & Excellence, 12.
  45. Zarinfard, S., Rahimi, M., & Mohseny, A. (2020). The impact of flipped classroom on EFL learners’ development of reading comprehension. Technology of Education Journal (TEJ), 14(2), 247–259.
  46. Zen, Z. Z., Zen, Z., & Reflianto, R. (2019). Influence of flipped classroom and social engagement on vocational students’ speaking performance. 5th International Conference on Education and Technology (ICET 2019).