Analysis of metacognitive characteristics in group discussion on grade 5 fraction materials

  • Dyah Triwahyuningtyas 
    Universitas Negeri Malang Universitas PGRI Kanjuruhan Malang
    Indonesia
  • Cholis Sa’dijah
    Universitas Negeri Malang
    Indonesia
  • Makbul Muksar
    Universitas Negeri Malang
    Indonesia
  • Subanji Subanji
    Universitas Negeri Malang
    Indonesia

Abstract

Math problems require students to think critically in solving a problem. Metacognition leads to the ability to think critically and think at a higher level cognitive process in learning. This study aims to describe the characteristics of metacognition in group discussions on fraction material for grade 5 elementary school students. This type of research uses qualitative descriptive research. The data collection methods used in this research are observation, interview and documentation. The characteristics of students' metacognition can be obtained through observation when students discuss working on problems. Metacognitive activities of 5th grade elementary school students are classified into 3 namely awareness, regulation and evaluation. Students' metacognitive awareness is able to understand the problem and students are able to know what the next thing will be done after understanding the problem. Regulation students are able to choose the strategy that will be used to solve the problem and students are able to apply the chosen strategy to solve the problem. Evaluation students are able to check the answers that are done correctly and are able to ensure that the answers are correct. During group discussions, students are divided into 3 roles, namely students as experts, facilitators and beginners. During group discussion activities to solve problems, not all metacognitive activities appear in each student. Facilitators can influence beginners to be active in the discussion and expert students can help group mates to rethink what they have done before.
Keywords
  • Metacognitive
  • Group discussion
  • Positioning
References
  1. Aminah, M., Kusumah, Y. S., Suryadi, D., & Sumarmo, U. (2018). The effect of metacognitive teaching and mathematical prior knowledge on mathematical logical thinking ability and self-regulated learning. International Journal of Instruction, 11(3), 45–62. https://doi.org/10.12973/iji.2018.1134a
  2. Aryani, I., Maulida, D., Pengajar, S., Keguruan, F., Ilmu, D., & Adalah, M. (2019). ANALISIS Kesalahan Siswa Dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Matematika Melalui Higher Order Thinking Skill (HOTS). Jurnal Serambi Ilmu, 20(2).
  3. Baten, E., & Desoete, A. (2019). Metacognition and motivation in school-aged children with and without mathematical learning disabilities in Flanders. ZDM - Mathematics Education, 51(4), 679–689. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-018-01024-6
  4. Branigan, H. E., & Donaldson, D. I. (2020). Teachers Matter for Metacognition: Facilitating Metacognition in the Primary School Through Teacher-Pupil Interactions. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 38(August), 100718. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2020.100718
  5. Brijlall, D. (2015). Exploring The Stages of Polya’s Problem-solving Model during Collaborative Learning: A Case of Fractions. International Journal of Educational Sciences, 11(3), 291–299. https://doi.org/10.1080/09751122.2015.11890401
  6. Chen, L. T., & Liu, L. (2020). Social Presence in Multidimensional Online Discussion: The Roles of Group Size and Requirements for Discussions. Computers in the Schools, 37(2), 116–140. https://doi.org/10.1080/07380569.2020.1756648
  7. DeJarnette, A. F., & González, G. (2015). Positioning during group work on a novel task in Algebra II. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 46(4), 378–422. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.46.4.0378
  8. Dewi, S. V., Sa’dijah, C., Muksar, M., & Qohar, A. (2019). The interaction of students in mathematical problem solving with group discussion activities. International Journal of Innovation, Creativity and Change, 10(2), 85–96.
  9. Dwi, O. :, Rendy, B., Putera, A., Hidayah, R., Suarningtyas, S., & Mitasari, R. A. (2021). Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Matematika dan Sains. In JPPMS (Vol. 5, Issue 2). http://journal.unesa.ac.id/index.php/jppms/
  10. Faradiba, S. S., Sadijah, C., Parta, I. N., & Rahardjo, S. (2019). Metacognitive therapy for mathematics disorder. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1157(4). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1157/4/042079
  11. Faridah, I. (2014). Hubungan Kemampuan Membaca Pemahaman dengan Kemampuan Memahami Soal Cerita Matematika Sekolah Dasar (Vol. 3, Issue 1).
  12. Hancock, E., & Karakok, G. (2020). Supporting the Development of Process-Focused Metacognition During Problem-Solving. Primus, 0(0), 1–34. https://doi.org/10.1080/10511970.2020.1772914
  13. Hidayat, A., Sa, C., & Sulandra, I. M. (2019). Proses Berpikir Siswa Field Dependent dalam Menyelesaikan Masalah Geometri Berdasarkan Tahapan Polya. Jurnal Pendidikan : Teori, Penelitian, Dan Pengembangan, 4(7), 923–937.
  14. Huda, S., Agustin, D., & Khikmiyah, F. (2021). Karakteristik Metakognisi Dalam Pemecahan Masalah Matematika Ditinjau Dari Tipe Kepribadian. Mathematic Education And Aplication, 3(1), 20–34.
  15. Husain, R., & Kaharu, A. (2020). Menghadapi Era Abad 21: Tantangan Guru Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini di Kabupaten Bone Bolango. Jurnal Obsesi : Jurnal Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini, 5(1), 85. https://doi.org/10.31004/obsesi.v5i1.527
  16. Kopparla, M., Bicer, A., Vela, K., Lee, Y., Bevan, D., Kwon, H., Caldwell, C., Capraro, M. M., & Capraro, R. M. (2019). The effects of problem-posing intervention types on elementary students’ problem-solving. Educational Studies, 45(6), 708–725. https://doi.org/10.1080/03055698.2018.1509785
  17. Lei, W., Chen, J., Yang, C., Guo, Y., Feng, P., Feng, T., & Li, H. (2020). Metacognition-related regions modulate the reactivity effect of confidence ratings on perceptual decision-making. Neuropsychologia, 144(May), 107502. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2020.107502
  18. Lestari, W., Selvia, F., & Layliyyah, R. (2019). Pendekatan Open-Ended Terhadap Kemampuan Metakognitif Siswa.
  19. Magiera, M. T., & Zawojewski, J. S. (2011). Characterizations of social-based and self-based contexts associated with students’awareness, evaluation,and regulation of their thinking during small-group mathematical modeling. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 42(5), 486–520. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.42.5.0486
  20. Mokos, E., & Kafoussi, S. (2013). Elementary Students’ Spontaneous Metacognitive Functions in Different Types of Mathematical Problems. Journal of Research in Mathematics Education REDIMAT -Journal ofResearch in Mathematics Education, 2(2), 242–267. https://doi.org/10.4471/redimat.2013.29
  21. Muksar, M., Wasqita, R., & Rahardi, R. (2022). Analisis Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Siswa Pada Materi Bangun Datar Ditinjau Dari Gaya Belajar. AKSIOMA: Jurnal Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika, 11(2), 1501. https://doi.org/10.24127/ajpm.v11i2.5029
  22. Murwanto, A., Qohar, A., & Sa’dijah, C. (2022). Mosharafa: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika Pengembangan LKPD Daring Pendekatan Guided Discovery Berbasis HOTS Materi Persamaan dan Fungsi Kuadrat. 11(3). http://journal.institutpendidikan.ac.id/index.php/mosharafa
  23. Nina Adlini, M., Hanifa Dinda, A., Yulinda, S., Chotimah, O., & Julia Merliyana, S. (2022). Metode Penelitian Kualitatif Studi Pustaka (Vol. 6, Issue 1).
  24. Sa’dijah, C., Murtafiah, W., Anwar, L., & Sa’diyah, M. (2023). Exploring the Content Knowledge of Prospective Mathematics Teacher Students in Designing HOTS Questions. AIP Conference Proceedings, 2569. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0113669
  25. Sa’dijah, C., Zuriati, S., & Sisworo, ; (2021). Aktivitas Metakognitif Siswa Dalam Memecahkan Masalah Bangun Ruang Sisi Datar. In Jurnal Kajian Pembelajaran Matematika (Vol. 5, Issue 2). http://journal2.um.ac.id/index.php/jkpm
  26. Setyaningrum, D. U., Helti, D., & Mampouw, L. (2020). Mosharafa: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika Proses Metakognisi Siswa SMP dalam Pemecahan Masalah Perbandingan Senilai dan Berbalik Nilai. 9(2). http://journal.institutpendidikan.ac.id/index.php/mosharafa
  27. Sholihah, U., Nusantara, T., Sa’Dijah, C., & Susanto, H. (2019). The ability of students’ visual thinking in solving integral problems. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1157(3). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1157/3/032090
  28. Smith, J. M., & Mancy, R. (2018). Exploring the relationship between metacognitive and collaborative talk during group mathematical problem-solving–what do we mean by collaborative metacognition? Research in Mathematics Education, 20(1), 14–36. https://doi.org/10.1080/14794802.2017.1410215
  29. Subanji, & Fitri Amalia, N. (2019). Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Siswa Melalui Penerapan Pendekatan Realistic Mathematics Education Berbantuan Media Manipulatif Origami. http://journal.um.ac.id/index.php/jptpp/
  30. Sumitro, N. K., Sa’dijah, C., Raharjo, S., & Rahardi, R. (2019). The emergence of metacognitive activities through the scaffolding interaction. International Journal of Recent Technology and Engineering, 8(1C2), 665–671.
  31. Sylvia, I., Anwar, S., & Khairani, K. (2019). Pengembangan Instrumen Penilaian Autentik Berbasis Pendekatan Authentic Inquiry Learning Pada Mata Pelajaran Sosiologi di Sekolah Menengah Atas. Jurnal Socius: Journal of Sociology Research and Education, 6(2), 103. https://doi.org/10.24036/scs.v6i2.162
  32. Triwahyuningtyas, D., & Sesanti, N. R. (2023). Metacognition analysis of five grade students in elementary school on numbers. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 12(1), 327–336. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v12i1.23233
  33. Ulandari, L., Amry, Z., & Saragih, S. (2019). Development of Learning Materials Based on Realistic Mathemathics Aducation Approach to Improve Students` Mathemathical Problem Solving Ability and Self-Efficacy. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 14(2), 375–383. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/5729
  34. Vita Susana dan Suyato MPd, D., kunci, K., & Metode Diskusi dan Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis, P. (2017a). The Implementation Effect Of Discussion Method On Critical Thinking Skills Students In Pancasila And Civic Education Subject In Karangmojo Islamic State Junior High School (MTS Negeri Karangmojo).
  35. Vita Susana dan Suyato MPd, D., kunci, K., & Metode Diskusi dan Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis, P. (2017b). The Implementation Effect Of Discussion Method On Critical Thinking Skills Students In Pancasila And Civic Education Subject In Karangmojo Islamic State Junior High School (MTS Negeri Karangmojo).
  36. Wester, J. S. (2020). Students’ Possibilities to Learn From Group Discussions Integrated in Whole-class Teaching in Mathematics. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 0(0), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2020.1788148
  37. Williams, A. T., & Svensson, M. (2020a). Student Teachers’ Collaborative Learning of Science in Small-Group Discussions. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 0(0), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2020.1788141
  38. Williams, A. T., & Svensson, M. (2020b). Student Teachers’ Collaborative Learning of Science in Small-Group Discussions. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 0(0), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2020.1788141
  39. zuriati suci, sa’dijah cholis, & sisworo. (2021). aktifitas metakognitif siswa dalam pemecahan masalah bangun sisi datar. Kajian Pembelajaran Matematika, 5, 26–37.

Downloads

PDF

Statistic

Abstract Views
: 334 times
PDF
: 0 times