The effect of cognitive style on the analysis ability of grade 4 elementary school students

  • Wahyu Susiloningsih 
    Universitas Negeri Malang, Universitas PGRI Adi Buana Surabaya
    Indonesia
  • Herawati Susilo
    Universitas Negeri Malang
    Indonesia
  • Mohammad Zainuddin
    Universitas Negeri Malang
    Indonesia
  • Dedi Kuswandi
    Universitas Negeri Malang
    Indonesia
  • Oktaviani Adhi Suciptaningsih
    Universitas Negeri Malang
    Indonesia
  • Hanim Faizah
    Universitas PGRI Adi Buana Surabaya
    Indonesia

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine the relationship between cognitive style (reflective and impulsive) on students' analytical abilities. Analytical ability is part of learning outcomes. There are seven levels of cognitive learning outcomes which include knowledge, understanding, application, analysis, synthesis, evaluation, and creative problem-solving. Students' analytical abilities are influenced by many things, one of which is cognitive style. Cognitive style is a way of accepting and managing attitudes towards information, as well as habits related to the world of individual learning. Reflective and impulsive cognitive styles are cognitive styles with indicators of time understanding concepts. Reflective cognitive styles usually take a long time to respond, but consider all available options, and have high concentration while learning. Meanwhile, students with an impulsive cognitive style are the opposite. The approach used in this study is a correlational and multiple regression approach. The variables in this study are reflective cognitive style and impulsive cognitive style as independent variables and analytical skills as the dependent variable with a population of 130 students. The results showed that there was a relationship between students' cognitive style and analytical skills. The greater the cognitive style score, the greater the analytical ability score. Then the cognitive style affects the analytical ability of 19.9%, where the other 80.1% is influenced by other factors.
Keywords
  • Reflective cognitive style
  • Impulsive cognitive style
  • Analytical skills
References
  1. Amin, M., George, B., & Amin, M. (2023). A Literature Review of Cognitive Styles and Parenting Styles among Students. International Journal For Multidisciplinary Research, 5(2), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.36948/ijfmr.2023.v05i02.2561
  2. Anthycamurty, R. C. C., Mardiyana, & Saputro, D. R. S. (2018a). Analysis of problem solving in terms of cognitive style. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 983(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/983/1/012146
  3. Anthycamurty, R. C. C., Mardiyana, & Saputro, D. R. S. (2018b). Analysis of problem solving in terms of cognitive style. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 983(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/983/1/012146
  4. Bahrami, A., Moradi, J., & Etaati, Z. (2020). The Relationship between Cognitive Styles, Attention and Performance of Shooting Skill. International Journal of Motor Control and Learning (IJMCL), 2(4), 3–9. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.29252/ijmcl.2.3.23
  5. Chen, C. (2021). A study on the relationship between reflective-impulsive cognitive styles and oral proficiency of efl learners. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 11(7), 836–841. https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.1107.10
  6. Chen, M. R. A., & Hwang, G. J. (2022). Effects of experiencing authentic contexts on English speaking performances, anxiety and motivation of EFL students with different cognitive styles. Interactive Learning Environments, 30(9), 1619–1639. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2020.1734626
  7. Cintamulya, I. (2019). Analysis of students’ critical thinking skills with reflective and impulsive cognitive styles on conservation and environmental knowledge learning. Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, 20(1), 1–14.
  8. Engin, A. (2021). The cognitive ability and working memory framework: Interpreting cognitive reflection test results in the domain of the cognitive experiential theory. Central European Journal of Operations Research, 29(1), 227–245. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10100-020-00721-6
  9. Exacta, A. P., Suswandari, M., Giyatmi, G., Hadiprasetyo, K., Kurniaji, B., Rosyid, A., & Ismail, I. (2024). Student misconceptions based on cognitive style. International Journal of Educational Studies in Social Sciences, 4(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.53402/ijesss.v4i1.398
  10. Giancola, M., Palmiero, M., & D’amico, S. (2022). Field Dependent–Independent Cognitive Style and Creativity From the Process and Product-Oriented Approaches: a Systematic Review. Creativity Studies, 15(2), 542–559. https://doi.org/10.3846/cs.2022.15988
  11. Ismaeel, D. A., & Mulhim, E. N. Al. (2021). The influence of interactive and static infographics on the academic achievement of reflective and impulsive students. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 37(1), 147–162. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.6138
  12. Jones, S. H., & Wright, M. (2011). Effect of Cognitive Style on Performance in Introductory Financial Accounting and the Decision to Major in Accountint. Global Perspectives on Accounting Education, 8, 7–26.
  13. Lacko, D., Prošek, T., Čeněk, J., Helísková, M., Ugwitz, P., Svoboda, V., Počaji, P., Vais, M., Halířová, H., Juřík, V., & Šašinka, Č. (2023). Analytic and holistic cognitive style as a set of independent manifests: Evidence from a validation study of six measurement instruments. PLoS ONE, 18(6 June), 1–30. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0287057
  14. Ledzińska, M., Batalla, J. M., & Stolarski, M. (2014). Cognitive styles could be implicitly assessed in the internet environment: Reflection-impulsivity is manifested in individual manner of searching for information. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 13(1), 133–145. https://doi.org/10.33225/jbse/14.13.133
  15. Marashi, H., & Gholami, M. (2020). Applying Cooperative and Individual Offline Planning in Speaking Classes: A Comparison of Impulsive and Reflective EFL Learners. Journal of Teaching Language Skills, 39, 1–34. https://doi.org/10.22099/jtls.2021.38593.2894
  16. Nykyporets, S., & Chopliak, V. (2023). Pedagogical Strategies for Cognitive Empowerment: Approaches To Enhance Analytical Proficiency in Technical University Students. Grail of Science, 31(31), 372–382. https://doi.org/10.36074/grail-of-science.15.09.2023.58
  17. Saputra, E., & Zulmaulida, R. (2020). Pengaruh Gaya Kognitif Terhadap Kemampuan Komunikasi Matematis Melalui Analisis Koefisien Determinasi Dan Uji Regresi. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Matematika Al Qalasadi, 4(2), 69–76. https://doi.org/10.32505/qalasadi.v4i2.2250
  18. Saputri, D. (2018). Pengaruh Gaya Kognitif dan Motivasi Belajar Terhadap Prestasi Belajar Matematika. Jurnal Pendidikan MIPA, 1(2), 165–171.
  19. Satriawan, M. A., Budiarto, M. T., & Siswono, T. Y. E. (2018). Students’ Relational Thinking of Impulsive and Reflective in Solving Mathematical Problem. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 947(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/947/1/012030
  20. Setiawan, A. A., Muhtadi, A., & Hukom, J. (2022). Blended Learning and Student Mathematics Ability in Indonesia: A Meta-Analysis Study. International Journal of Instruction, 15(2), 905–916. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2022.15249a
  21. Setiawan, A., Wawan, Koderi, & Pratiwi, W. (2020). The effect of cognitive styles on reasoning and problem solving ability. Journal for the Mathematics Education and Teaching, 1(2), 87–93.
  22. Stoyanov, S., & Kirschner, P. (2007). Effect of problem solving support and cognitive styles on idea generation: Implications for technology-enhanced learning. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 40(1), 49–63. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2007.10782496
  23. Cowgill II, D. A., & Waring, S. M. (2017). Historical thinking: Analyzing student and teacher ability to analyze sources. Journal of Social Studies Education Research, 8(1), 115–145.
  24. Isnaeni, W., Prasetyo, A. P. B., & Atikasari, S. (2012). Pengaruh Pendekatan Problem-Based Learning Dalam Materi Pencemaran Lingkungan Terhadap Kemampuan Analisis. Journal of Biology Education, 1(3).
  25. Kraiger, K., Ford, J. K., & Salas, E. (1993). Application of cognitive, skill-based, and affective theories of learning outcomes to new methods of training evaluation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78(2), 311.
  26. Maarif, S., Umam, K., Febriantoni, F., & Slamet, S. (2022). Bagaimana kemampuan pemecahan masalah barisan dan deret ditinjau dari gaya kognitif siswa. Aksioma: Jurnal Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika, 11(4).
  27. Neugebauer, P., & Prediger, S. (2022). Q uality of Teaching Practices for All Students: Multilevel Analysis of Language-Responsive Teaching for Robust Understanding. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 1–24.
  28. Putri, H., Susiani, D., Wandani, N. S., & Putri, F. A. (2022). Instrumen Penilaian Hasil Pembelajaran Kognitif pada Tes Uraian dan Tes Objektif. Jurnal Papeda: Jurnal Publikasi Pendidikan Dasar, 4(2), 139–148.
  29. Rahmatina, S., Sumarmo, U., & Johar, R. (2014). Tingkat berpikir kreatif siswa dalam menyelesaikan masalah matematika berdasarkan gaya kognitif reflektif dan impulsif. Jurnal Didaktik Matematika, 1(1).
  30. Rismen, S., Juwita, R., & Devinda, U. (2020). Profil Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematika Siswa Ditinjau dari Gaya Kognitif Reflektif. Jurnal Cendekia: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 4(1), 163–171.
  31. Sugiyanti, S., Utami, R. E., & Indriana, K. (2018). Profil Metakognisi Mahasiswa Perempuan Dalam Menyelesaikan Masalah Bangun Datar Ditinjau Dari Gaya Kognitif Reflektif Dan Impulsif. Jurnal Pendidikan Edutama, 5(1), 91–100.
  32. Thaneerananon, T., Triampo, W., & Nokkaew, A. (2016). Development of a Test to Evaluate Students’ Analytical Thinking Based on Fact versus Opinion Differentiation. International Journal of Instruction, 9(2), 123–138.
  33. Warli, W. (2014). Kreativitas siswa SMP yang bergaya kognitif reflektif atau impulsif dalam memecahkan masalah geometri. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Pembelajaran (JPP), 20(2), 190–201.

Downloads

PDF

Statistic

Abstract Views
: 372 times
PDF
: 1 times