Alignment of nautical studies at STIP Jakarta with IMO-STCW standards: a graduate perspective

Damoyanto Purba; Retno Sawitri Wulandari; Marudut Bernadtua Simanjuntak

doi:10.29210/020243764

Alignment of nautical studies at STIP Jakarta with IMO-STCW standards: a graduate perspective

Damoyanto Purba

⁽¹⁾, Retno Sawitri Wulandari ⁽²⁾, Marudut Bernadtua Simanjuntak ⁽³⁾,
(1) Maritime Institute of Jakarta (Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Pelayaran)

Indonesia
(2) Maritime Institute of Jakarta (Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Pelayaran)

Indonesia
(3) Maritime Institute of Jakarta (Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Pelayaran)

Indonesia

Corresponding Author

DOI : https://doi.org/10.29210/020243764

Full Text:

Language : en

Abstract

This research contributes to the existing literature by providing empirical insights into English literacy proficiency among maritime graduates in Indonesia, particularly from STIP Jakarta. By focusing on the perspectives of graduates, the study offers a nuanced understanding of the challenges and opportunities in English language education within the maritime context. The findings have implications for curriculum development, teaching methodologies, and policy-making in maritime education and training. The study concludes with recommendations for enhancing English literacy education at STIP Jakarta and other maritime institutions, including the integration of language skills into technical courses, the use of authentic materials, and the provision of language support services for students. Overall, this research highlights the importance of English literacy in preparing maritime professionals for global communication and collaboration in the maritime industry.

References

Albayrak, T., & Ziarati, R. (2012). Encouraging research in maritime education & training. Journal of Maritime Transport and Engineering, 1(1), 4–9.

Balkin, R. (2006). The international maritime organization and maritime security. Tul. Mar. LJ, 30, 1.

Bankole, O. A., Lalitha, V. V. M., Khan, H. U., & Jinugu, A. (2017). Information technology in the maritime industry past, present and future: focus on lng carriers. 2017 IEEE 7th International Advance Computing Conference (IACC), 759–763.

Berg, H. P. (2013). Human factors and safety culture in maritime safety. Marine Navigation and Safety of Sea Transportation: STCW, Maritime Education and Training (MET), Human Resources and Crew Manning, Maritime Policy, Logistics and Economic Matters, 107, 107–115.

Bergheim, K., Nielsen, M. B., Mearns, K., & Eid, J. (2015). The relationship between psychological capital, job satisfaction, and safety perceptions in the maritime industry. Safety Science, 74, 27–36.

Brenker, M., Möckel, S., Küper, M., Schmid, S., Spann, M., & Strohschneider, S. (2017). Challenges of multinational crewing: a qualitative study with cadets. WMU Journal of Maritime Affairs, 16, 365–384.

Chen, X., Bai, X., & Xiao, Y. (2017). The application of E-learning in maritime education and training in China. TransNav: International Journal on Marine Navigation and Safety of Sea Transportation, 11(2), 349–354.

Comtois, C., & Slack, B. (2017). Sustainable development and corporate strategies of the maritime industry. In Ports, Cities, and Global Supply Chains (pp. 249–262). Routledge.

Creswell, J. W., & Clark, V. L. P. (2011). Choosing a mixed methods design. In Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research (pp. 53–106). Sage Publications, Inc.

Darlington, Y., & Scott, D. (2020). Qualitative research in practice: Stories from the field. Routledge.

de la Peña Zarzuelo, I., Soeane, M. J. F., & Bermúdez, B. L. (2020). Industry 4.0 in the port and maritime industry: A literature review. Journal of Industrial Information Integration, 20, 100173.

Dyagileva, O., Goridko, N., Popova, H., Voloshynov, S., & Yurzhenko, A. (2020). Ensuring sustainable development of education of future maritime transport professionals by means of network interaction.

Edirisinghe, P., Zhihong, J., & Lixin, S. (2016). The Direction of Maritime Education and Training development: A Conceptual Approach. Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Maritime Education and Training, Dalian Maritime University, 15th October.

Ferritto, V. R. (2016). Maritime education factors and presenteeism: a comparative quantitative study. WMU Journal of Maritime Affairs, 15, 353–380.

Franceschi, D. (2014). The features of maritime English discourse. International Journal of English Linguistics, 4(2), 78.

Hasse, C. (2014). The anthropological paradigm of practice-based learning. International Handbook of Research in Professional and Practice-Based Learning, 369–391.

House, D., & Saeed, F. (2016). The seamanship examiner: for STCW certification examinations. Taylor & Francis.

Ilter, A. T., & Karacar, P. (2020). Mobile Technology and Social Media Literacy. In Advances in Media, Entertainment, and the Arts (pp. 180–196). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-1534-1.ch010

IMO, S. C. E. (2018). IMO. London.

Jeronen, E. (2020). Sustainable development. In Encyclopedia of Sustainable Management (pp. 1–7). Springer.

Joshi, A., Kale, S., Chandel, S., & Pal, D. K. (2015). Likert scale: Explored and explained. British Journal of Applied Science & Technology, 7(4), 396.

Kadhm, S. J. (2021). Validation of Sherouk’s Critical Thinking Test (SH-CTT). In Research Anthology on Developing Critical Thinking Skills in Students (pp. 1345–1356). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-3022-1.ch070

Khan, A. (2020). Digital information literacy skills of Pakistani librarians: exploring supply-demand mismatches, adoption strategies and acquisition barriers. In Digital Library Perspectives (Vol. 36, Issue 2, pp. 167–189). Emerald. https://doi.org/10.1108/dlp-01-2020-0003

Kidd, R., & McCarthy, E. (2019). Maritime education in the age of autonomy. WIT Transactions on The Built Environment, 187, 221–230.

Knies, J. M. (2019). A qualitative study of college cadet women’s leadership identity development in a military training environment. Virginia Tech.

Llosa, L. (2016). Assessing Students’ Content Knowledge and Language Proficiency. In Language Testing and Assessment (pp. 1–12). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02326-7_33-1

Mankabady, S. (1986). The International Maritime Organization, Volume 1: International Shipping Rules.

Manuel, M. E. (2017). Vocational and academic approaches to maritime education and training (MET): Trends, challenges and opportunities. WMU Journal of Maritime Affairs, 16, 473–483.

Moodie, G. (2002). Identifying vocational education and training. Journal of Vocational Education and Training, 54(2), 249–266.

Norris, S. E. (2021). The Development of the Entrepreneurial Mindset, Critical Thinking Skills, and Critical Reflective Practices Through Experiential Learning Activities in Graduate Business School. In Research Anthology on Developing Critical Thinking Skills in Students (pp. 210–231). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-3022-1.ch013

Saldana, J. (2014). Thinking qualitatively: Methods of mind. SAGE publications.

Sharma, A., Kim, T., Nazir, S., & Chae, C. (2019). Catching up with time? Examining the STCW competence framework for autonomous shipping. Proceedings of the Ergoship Conference, Haugesund, Norway, 24–25.

Takacs, Z. K., Swart, E. K., & Bus, A. G. (2015). Benefits and pitfalls of multimedia and interactive features in technology-enhanced storybooks: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 85(4), 698–739.

Thanh, N. C., & Thanh, T. T. (2015). The interconnection between interpretivist paradigm and qualitative methods in education. American Journal of Educational Science, 1(2), 24–27.

Willig, C. (2014). Interpretation and analysis. The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Data Analysis, 481.

Yilmaz, K. (2013). Comparison of quantitative and qualitative research traditions: Epistemological, theoretical, and methodological differences. European Journal of Education, 48(2), 311–325.

Young, C. (1995). Comprehensive Revision of the STCW convention: an overview. J. Mar. L. & Com., 26, 1.

Zaderei, A. (2020). Ensuring the sustainability of the human resources management system of maritime industry enterprises. Access: Access to Science, Business, Innovation in Digital Economy, 1(2), 146–156.

Article Metrics

Abstract Views : 472 times

PDF Downloaded : 0 times

Refbacks

There are currently no refbacks.