English literacy among maritime graduates: a study at STIP Jakarta

  • Marudut Bernadtua Simanjuntak 
    Maritime Institute of Jakarta (Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Pelayaran)
    Indonesia
    https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1801-8762
  • Retno Sawitri Wulandari
    Maritime Institute of Jakarta (Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Pelayaran)
    Indonesia
  • Larsen Barasa
    Maritime Institute of Jakarta (Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Pelayaran)
    Indonesia

Abstract

This research investigates English literacy proficiency among graduates of Maritime Institute Jakarta (STIP Jakarta), focusing on deck officers, engine officers, and shipping professionals. The study aims to assess proficiency levels, identify factors influencing English acquisition, and evaluate alignment with International Maritime Organisation (IMO) Standards of Training, Certification, and Watchkeeping (STCW).The research employs qualitative interviews with 70 alumni to explore proficiency levels, instructional quality, exposure, and personal motivation. STIP Jakarta's curriculum is also analyzed for its alignment with IMO-STCW standards, particularly in communication skills and technical terminology. The findings reveal varied proficiency levels across skills, with implications for effective communication, compliance with regulations, and career advancement in the maritime industry.The study highlights the importance of targeted interventions to address proficiency gaps and recommends collaborative efforts to enhance English literacy education in maritime institutions. This is crucial for fostering safety and professionalism in the global maritime industry.
References
  1. Agrifoglio, R., Cannavale, C., Laurenza, E., & Metallo, C. (2017). How emerging digital technologies affect operations management through co-creation. Empirical evidence from the maritime industry. Production Planning & Control, 28(16), 1298–1306.
  2. Al Rassi, R. A. I. (2019). Effects of biliteracies on bilingual cognitive functions. The University of Edinburgh.
  3. Albayrak, T., & Ziarati, R. (2012). Encouraging research in maritime education & training. Journal of Maritime Transport and Engineering, 1(1), 4–9.
  4. Autsadee, Y., Jeevan, J., Mohd Salleh, N. H. Bin, & Othman, M. R. Bin. (2023). Digital tools and challenges in human resource development and its potential within the maritime sector through bibliometric analysis. Journal of International Maritime Safety, Environmental Affairs, and Shipping, 7(4), 2286409.
  5. Berg, H. P. (2013). Human factors and safety culture in maritime safety. Marine Navigation and Safety of Sea Transportation: STCW, Maritime Education and Training (MET), Human Resources and Crew Manning, Maritime Policy, Logistics and Economic Matters, 107, 107–115.
  6. Brenker, M., Möckel, S., Küper, M., Schmid, S., Spann, M., & Strohschneider, S. (2017). Challenges of multinational crewing: a qualitative study with cadets. WMU Journal of Maritime Affairs, 16, 365–384.
  7. Canh, L. Van. (2014). Great expectations: The TESOL practicum as a professional learning experience. Tesol Journal, 5(2), 199–224.
  8. Cho, H., & Gulley, J. (2017). A catalyst for change: Service‐learning for TESOL graduate students. Tesol Journal, 8(3), 613–635.
  9. Christodoulou-Varotsi, I., & Pentsov, D. A. (2008). The STCW Convention and related instruments. Maritime Work Law Fundamentals: Responsible Shipowners, Reliable Seafarers, 422–639.
  10. Comtois, C., & Slack, B. (2017). Sustainable development and corporate strategies of the maritime industry. In Ports, Cities, and Global Supply Chains (pp. 249–262). Routledge.
  11. Curry, M. J., & Lillis, T. (2022). Multilingualism in academic writing for publication: Putting English in its place. Language Teaching, 1–14.
  12. Darlington, Y., & Scott, D. (2020). Qualitative research in practice: Stories from the field. Routledge.
  13. de la Peña Zarzuelo, I., Soeane, M. J. F., & Bermúdez, B. L. (2020). Industry 4.0 in the port and maritime industry: A literature review. Journal of Industrial Information Integration, 20, 100173.
  14. Demydenko, N. (2012). Teaching maritime English: A linguistic approach. Journal of Shipping and Ocean Engineering, 2(4), 249.
  15. Fajardo, M. F. (2015). A review of critical literacy beliefs and practices of English language learners and teachers. University of Sydney Papers in TESOL, 10.
  16. Franceschi, D. (2014). The features of maritime English discourse. International Journal of English Linguistics, 4(2), 78.
  17. Gavalas, D., Syriopoulos, T., & Roumpis, E. (2022). Digital adoption and efficiency in the maritime industry. Journal of Shipping and Trade, 7(1), 11.
  18. Ghosh, S., Bowles, M., Ranmuthugala, D., & Brooks, B. (2014). On a lookout beyond STCW: Seeking standards and context for the authentic assessment of seafarers. 15th Annual General Assembly of the International Association of Maritime Universities, IAMU AGA 2014-Looking Ahead: Innovation in Maritime Education, Training and Research, 77–86.
  19. Graham, J. G. (1987). English language proficiency and the prediction of academic success. TESOL Quarterly, 21(3), 505–521.
  20. Han, Y. J. (2015). Successfully flipping the ESL classroom for learner autonomy. NYS Tesol Journal, 2(1), 98–109.
  21. House, D., & Saeed, F. (2016). The seamanship examiner: for STCW certification examinations. Taylor & Francis.
  22. Hui, Z., & Ishak, N. A. B. (2022). A Review of Maritime English Teaching Curriculum in China. Journal of Research in Educational Sciences, 13(15), 5–12.
  23. IMO, S. C. E. (2018). IMO. London.
  24. Lau, S. M.-C. (2013). A study of critical literacy work with beginning English language learners: An integrated approach. Critical Inquiry in Language Studies, 10(1), 1–30.
  25. Llosa, L. (2016). Assessing Students’ Content Knowledge and Language Proficiency. In Language Testing and Assessment (pp. 1–12). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02326-7_33-1
  26. Mallam, S. C., Nazir, S., & Renganayagalu, S. K. (2019). Rethinking maritime education, training, and operations in the digital era: Applications for emerging immersive technologies. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering, 7(12), 428.
  27. Munim, Z. H., Dushenko, M., Jimenez, V. J., Shakil, M. H., & Imset, M. (2020). Big data and artificial intelligence in the maritime industry: a bibliometric review and future research directions. Maritime Policy & Management, 47(5), 577–597.
  28. Navarro, J. D., Garbin, Z. Z., Agena, E. M., & Garcia, O. B. (2015). Maritime students’ English proficiency and their feedback on instructional materials. Asia Pacific Journal of Maritime Education, 1(1), 63–81.
  29. Neilson, B., & Rossiter, N. (2013). Still waiting, still moving: On labour, logistics and maritime industries. In Stillness in a mobile world (pp. 51–68). Routledge.
  30. Padgett, D. K. (2016). Qualitative methods in social work research (Vol. 36). Sage publications.
  31. Sadaf, A. (2019). Exploring Teachers’ Value Beliefs of Integrating Digital Literacy in K-12 Classrooms. In International Journal of Digital Literacy and Digital Competence (Vol. 10, Issue 2, pp. 1–14). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/ijdldc.2019040101
  32. Saray, S., Satır, T., & Dogan-Saglamtimur, N. (2021). Proficiency of Maritime English course: An investigation in Istanbul, Turkey. Heritage and Sustainable Development, 3(1), 6–15.
  33. Shen, F.-Y. (2013). Using Group Discussion with Taiwan’s EFL College Students: A Comparison of Comprehension Instruction for Book Club, Literature Circles, and Instructional Conversations. English Language Teaching, 6(12), 58–78.
  34. The Effect of Language Proficiency and Background Knowledge on EAP Students’ Reading Comprehension. (2013). In Validation in Language Assessment (pp. 155–182). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203053768-14
  35. Trenkner, P. (2009). Maritime English requirements and the revised STCW. Szczecin: Proceedings of the International Maritime English Conference IMEC, 21, 5–10.
  36. Valdés, G., Kibler, A., & Walqui, A. (2014). Changes in the expertise of ESL professionals: Knowledge and action in an era of new standards. Alexandria, VA: TESOL International Association.
  37. Vorona, I. (2018). Essence of the Discursive Competence as a Part of Professional Interaction of Future Physicians. Future Human Image, 9, 126–133.
  38. Weisberg, D. J. (2016). Methods and Strategies in Using Digital Literacy in Media and the Arts. In Advances in Media, Entertainment, and the Arts (pp. 456–471). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-4666-9667-9.ch022
  39. Young, C. (1995). Comprehensive Revision of the STCW convention: an overview. J. Mar. L. & Com., 26, 1.

Downloads

PDF

Statistic

Abstract Views
: 415 times
PDF
: 17 times