The role of knowledge management in enhancing innovation performance: a study on literature reviews

  • Ade Maria Ulfah Rakhmatika Sari 
    Universitas Udayana, Bali
    Indonesia
  • I Gede Riana
    Universitas Udayana, Bali
    Indonesia
  • I Gusti Ayu Manuati Dewi
    Universitas Udayana, Bali
    Indonesia
  • I Made Artha Wibawa
    Universitas Udayana, Bali
    Indonesia

Abstract

Determinant performance innovation can varies depending on context organization or industry certain. Many factors decider performance involving innovation combination internal and external aspects. Companies or organizations that succeed at innovation can often combine some or all of these factors to create an environment that supports the development and implementation of new ideas. This research aims to conduct a literature review study of company innovation performance. This research uses the literature study method to determine the measurement of company innovation performance of 56 articles related to innovation performance and its determining factors. The research was carried out by comprehensively identifying and conceptualizing the determinant framework for innovation performance in terms of (1) Innovativeness and attributes; (2) The impact of Ambidextrous Leadership On innovation performance; (3) Impact of knowledge management strategy on innovation performance; (4) The impact of creative self-efficacy on innovation performance; and (5) Conceptualization of determinants and their impact on innovation performance. The research results found that a company's ability to dynamically manage its resources is the main key to improving company performance. Thus, companies must have effective strategies in managing their resources and facing changes in the business environment to remain competitive.
Keywords
  • Company performance
  • Deterimant
  • Innovation
References
  1. Agostini, L., Nosella, A., & Filippini, R. (2016). Users and radical innovation performance: The moderating role of the organisational context. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 28(7), 798–810. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2016.1156667
  2. Akbari, M., Bagheri, A., Imani, S., & Asadnezhad, M. (2020). Does entrepreneurial leadership encourage innovation work behavior? The mediating role of creative self-efficacy and support for innovation. European Journal of Innovation Management, 24(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJIM-10-2019-0283
  3. Akhavan, P., & Hosseini, M. (2015). Social capital, knowledge sharing, and innovation capability: An empirical study of R&D teams in Iran. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 28, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2015.1072622
  4. Aliaga, O. A. (2000). Knowledge Management and Strategic Planning. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 2(1), 91–104. https://doi.org/10.1177/152342230000200108
  5. Auken, H., Madrid-Guijarro, A., & Garcia-Perez-de-Lema, D. (2008). Innovation and SME Performance in Spanish Manufacturing Firms. International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation Management - Int J Enterpren Innovat Manag, 8. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJEIM.2008.018611
  6. Bandura, A., Barbaranelli, C., Caprara, G. V., & Pastorelli, C. (1996). Multifaceted Impact of Self-Efficacy Beliefs on Academic Functioning. Child Development, 67(3), 1206. https://doi.org/10.2307/1131888
  7. Baregheh, A., Rowley, J., & Sambrook, S. (2009). Towards a multidisciplinary definition of innovation. Management Decision, 47(8), 1323–1339. https://doi.org/10.1108/00251740910984578
  8. Barradas, L. C. S., Rodrigues, E. M., & Pinto Ferreira, J. J. (2016). Deriving an ontology for knowledge management in collaborative innovation networks. International Journal of Innovation and Learning, 19(3), 335. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJIL.2016.075658
  9. Bierly, P., & Chakrabarti, A. (1996). Generic knowledge strategies in the U.S. pharmaceutical industry. Strategic Management Journal, 17(S2), 123–135. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250171111
  10. Buenechea‐Elberdin, M., Kianto, A., & Sáenz, J. (2018). Intellectual capital drivers of product and managerial innovation in high‐tech and low‐tech firms. R&D Management, 48(3), 290–307. https://doi.org/10.1111/radm.12271
  11. Carmeli, A., & Schaubroeck, J. (2007). The influence of leaders’ and other referents’ normative expectations on individual involvement in creative work. The Leadership Quarterly, 18(1), 35–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2006.11.001
  12. Cheng, H.-L., & Huang, M.-C. (2021). Does dual Embeddedness matter? Mechanisms and patterns of subsidiary ambidexterity that links a Subsidiary’s dual Embeddedness with its learning strategy. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 38(4), 1431–1465. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10490-020-09711-3
  13. Choi, B., & Lee, H. (2002). Knowledge management strategy and its link to knowledge creation process. Expert Systems with Applications, 23(3), 173–187. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0957-4174(02)00038-6
  14. Di Meglio, G., Stare, M., Maroto, A., & Rubalcaba, L. (2015). Public Services Performance: An Extended Framework and Empirical Assessment across the Enlarged EU. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 33(2), 321–341. https://doi.org/10.1068/c12264r
  15. Díaz Duarte, A. A., Marín Aguilar, J. T., & Rivera Martínez, M. E. (2022). Dimensions of Innovation Performance for Business Competitiveness. Advances in Management and Applied Economics, 35–44. https://doi.org/10.47260/amae/1253
  16. Edquist, C., Zabala-Iturriagagoitia, J. M., Barbero, J., & Zofío, J. L. (2018). On the meaning of innovation performance: Is the synthetic indicator of the Innovation Union Scoreboard flawed? Research Evaluation, 27(3), 196–211. https://doi.org/10.1093/reseval/rvy011
  17. Fagerberg, J., Mowery, D. C., & Nelson, R. R. (2005). The Oxford Handbook of Innovation. Oxford University Press.
  18. Fan, H., Han, B., Gao, W., & Li, W. (2022). How AI chatbots have reshaped the frontline interface in China: Examining the role of sales–service ambidexterity and the personalization–privacy paradox. International Journal of Emerging Markets, 17(4), 967–986. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOEM-04-2021-0532
  19. Forés, B., & Camisón, C. (2016). Does incremental and radical innovation performance depend on different types of knowledge accumulation capabilities and organizational size? Journal of Business Research, 69(2), 831–848. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.07.006
  20. Garcia, R., & Calantone, R. (2002). A critical look at technological innovation typology and innovativeness terminology: A literature review. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 19(2), 110–132. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-5885.1920110
  21. Gerlach, F., Hundeling, M., & Rosing, K. (2020). Ambidextrous leadership and innovation performance: A longitudinal study. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 41(3), 383–398. https://doi.org/10.1108/LODJ-07-2019-0321
  22. Ghosh, V., Bharadwaja, M., Yadav, S., & Kabra, G. (2019). Team-member exchange and innovative work behaviour: The role of psychological empowerment and creative self-efficacy. International Journal of Innovation Science, 11(3), 344–361. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJIS-12-2018-0132
  23. Gloet, M., & Terziovski, M. (2004). Exploring the relationship between knowledge management practices and innovation performance. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 15(5), 402–409. https://doi.org/10.1108/17410380410540390
  24. Hayaeian, S., Hesarzadeh, R., & Abbaszadeh, M. R. (2022). The impact of knowledge management strategies on the relationship between intellectual capital and innovation: Evidence from SMEs. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 23(4), 765–798. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIC-07-2020-0240
  25. Hu, W., Luo, J., Chen, Z., & Zhong, J. (2020). Ambidextrous leaders helping newcomers get on board: Achieving adjustment and proaction through distinct pathways. Journal of Business Research, 118, 406–414. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.06.064
  26. Inkinen, H. (2015). Review of empirical research on intellectual capital and firm performance. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 16(3), 518–565. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIC-01-2015-0002
  27. Iqbal, Z., Ghazanfar, F., Hameed, F., Mujtaba, G., & Swati, M. A. (2022). Ambidextrous leadership and change‐oriented organizational citizenship behavior: Mediating role of psychological safety. Journal of Public Affairs, 22(1), e2279. https://doi.org/10.1002/pa.2279
  28. Islam, T., Zahra, I., Rehman, S. U., & Jamil, S. (2024). How knowledge sharing encourages innovative work behavior through occupational self-efficacy? The moderating role of entrepreneurial leadership. Global Knowledge, Memory and Communication, 73(1/2), 67–83. https://doi.org/10.1108/GKMC-02-2022-0041
  29. Jia, J., Ma, G., Jiang, S., Wu, M., & Wu, Z. (2021). Influence of social media use at work on construction managers’ work performance: The knowledge seeker’s perspective. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 28(10), 3216–3235. https://doi.org/10.1108/ECAM-09-2020-0705
  30. Jiang, Y., Asante, D., Zhang, J., & Ampaw, E. M. (2023). The influence of ambidextrous leadership on the employee innovative behavior: An empirical study based on Chinese manufacturing enterprises. Current Psychology, 42(11), 9452–9465. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-021-02233-1
  31. Johannessen, J., Olsen, B., & Lumpkin, G. T. (2001). Innovation as newness: What is new, how new, and new to whom? European Journal of Innovation Management, 4(1), 20–31. https://doi.org/10.1108/14601060110365547
  32. Karwowski, M. (2012). Did Curiosity Kill the Cat? Relationship Between Trait Curiosity, Creative Self-Efficacy and Creative Personal Identity. Europe’s Journal of Psychology, 8(4), 547–558. https://doi.org/10.5964/ejop.v8i4.513
  33. Khan, I., Safdar, U., & Durrani, Z. (2021). The Light Triad Traits, Psychological Empowerment, Creative Self-Efficacy, Self-Resilience and Innovative Performance in ICT of Pakistan. Gomal University Journal of Research, 37, 297–310. https://doi.org/10.51380/gujr-37-03-05
  34. Kostis, P. C., Kafka, K. I., & Petrakis, P. E. (2018). Cultural change and innovation performance. Journal of Business Research, 88, 306–313. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2017.12.010
  35. Lai, Y.-L., Hsu, M.-S., Lin, F.-J., Chen, Y.-M., & Lin, Y.-H. (2014). The effects of industry cluster knowledge management on innovation performance. Journal of Business Research, 67(5), 734–739. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2013.11.036
  36. Mardani, A., Nikoosokhan, S., Moradi, M., & Doustar, M. (2018). The Relationship Between Knowledge Management and Innovation Performance. The Journal of High Technology Management Research, 29(1), 12–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hitech.2018.04.002
  37. Mueller, J., Renzl, B., & Will, M. G. (2020). Ambidextrous leadership: A meta-review applying static and dynamic multi-level perspectives. Review of Managerial Science, 14(1), 37–59. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-018-0297-9
  38. Mumtaz, S., & Parahoo, S. K. (2019). Promoting employee innovation performance: Examining the role of self-efficacy and growth need strength. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 69(4), 704–722. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPPM-12-2017-0330
  39. Na-Nan, K., Saribut, S., & Sanamthong, E. (2019). Mediating effects of perceived environment support and knowledge sharing between self-efficacy and job performance of SME employees. Industrial and Commercial Training, 51(6), 342–359. https://doi.org/10.1108/ICT-01-2019-0009
  40. Niu, H.-J. (2010). Investigating the effects of self-efficacy on foodservice industry employees’ career commitment. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 29(4), 743–750. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2010.03.006
  41. Noori, J., Bagheri Nasrabadi, M., Yazdi, N., & Babakhan, A. R. (2017). Innovative performance of Iranian knowledge-based firms: Large firms or SMEs? Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 122, 179–185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2016.04.025
  42. O’Sullivan, D., & Dooley, L. (2009). Applying Innovation (p. 391). https://doi.org/10.4135/9781452274898
  43. Prajogo, D. I., & Ahmed, P. K. (2006). Relationships between innovation stimulus, innovation capacity, and innovation performance. R&D Management, 36(5), 499–515. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9310.2006.00450.x
  44. Rosing, K., Frese, M., & Bausch, A. (2011). Explaining the heterogeneity of the leadership-innovation relationship: Ambidextrous leadership. The Leadership Quarterly, 22(5), 956–974. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2011.07.014
  45. Safdar, M., Batool, S. H., & Mahmood, K. (2021). Relationship between self-efficacy and knowledge sharing: Systematic review. Global Knowledge, Memory and Communication, 70(3), 254–271. https://doi.org/10.1108/GKMC-11-2019-0139
  46. Shehzad, M. U., Zhang, J., Latif, K. F., Jamil, K., & Waseel, A. H. (2023). Do green entrepreneurial orientation and green knowledge management matter in the pursuit of ambidextrous green innovation: A moderated mediation model. Journal of Cleaner Production, 388, 135971. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.135971
  47. Stolz, R. C., Blackmon, A. T., Engerman, K., Tonge, L., & McKayle, C. A. (2022). Poised for creativity: Benefits of exposing undergraduate students to creative problem-solving to moderate change in creative self-efficacy and academic achievement. Journal of Creativity, 32(2), 100024. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yjoc.2022.100024
  48. Tang, X., & Wei, S. (2022). How do ambidextrous leadership and self-efficacy influence employees’ enterprise system use: An empirical study of customer relationship management system context. Information Technology & People, 35(4), 1443–1465. https://doi.org/10.1108/ITP-07-2020-0479
  49. Tantawy, M., Herbert, K., McNally, J. J., Mengel, T., Piperopoulos, P., & Foord, D. (2021). Bringing creativity back to entrepreneurship education: Creative self-efficacy, creative process engagement, and entrepreneurial intentions. Journal of Business Venturing Insights, 15, e00239. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbvi.2021.e00239
  50. Tidd, J., & Pavitt, K. (2011). Managing Innovation: Integrating Technological, Market And Organizational Change.
  51. Tierney, P., & Farmer, S. M. (2011). Creative self-efficacy development and creative performance over time. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96(2), 277–293. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0020952
  52. Turner, N., Maylor, H., & Swart, J. (2015). Ambidexterity in projects: An intellectual capital perspective. International Journal of Project Management, 33(1), 177–188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2014.05.002
  53. Wilden, R., Gudergan, S. P., Nielsen, B. B., & Lings, I. (2013). Dynamic Capabilities and Performance: Strategy, Structure and Environment. Long Range Planning, 46(1–2), 72–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2012.12.001
  54. Zacher, H., Robinson, A. J., & Rosing, K. (2016). Ambidextrous Leadership and Employees’ Self-Reported Innovative Performance: The Role of Exploration and Exploitation Behaviors. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 50(1), 24–46. https://doi.org/10.1002/jocb.66
  55. Zacher, H., & Wilden, R. G. (2014). A daily diary study on ambidextrous leadership and self‐reported employee innovation. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 87(4), 813–820. https://doi.org/10.1111/joop.12070
  56. Zack, M., McKeen, J., & Singh, S. (2009). Knowledge management and organizational performance: An exploratory analysis. Journal of Knowledge Management, 13(6), 392–409. https://doi.org/10.1108/13673270910997088
  57. Zawislak, P., Tello-Gamarra, J., Alves, A., Barbieux, D., & Reichert, F. (2014). The different innovation capabilities of the firm: Further remarks upon the Brazilian experience. Journal of Innovation Economics, 13, 129. https://doi.org/10.3917/jie.013.0129

Downloads

PDF

Statistic

Abstract Views
: 427 times
PDF
: 18 times