The influence of the ability to understand mathematics concepts based on van hiele's level of thinking on the learning outcomes of mathematics education students

  • Nofyta Arlianti 
    Universitas Jambi
    Indonesia
  • Kamid Kamid
    Universitas Jambi
    Indonesia
  • Jefri Marzal
    Universitas Jambi
    Indonesia
  • Muhammad Haris Effendi Hasibuan
    Universitas Jambi
    Indonesia

Abstract

The aim of this research is to find out whether there is an influence on the ability to understand mathematical concepts based on Van Hiele theory on the learning outcomes of STKIP Muhammadiyah Sungai Penuh students. The research method that will be carried out is associative (correlational) research. Sample determination was carried out using random sampling technique or determining samples randomly after carrying out a normality test, test homogeneity and equality of means tests. The results of the calculations carried out obtained the calculated r value = 0.5 46 and r table = 0.444, apparently r count > r table , then it can be concluded that H 1 accepted , so it can be concluded that there is a significant relationship between learning interactions and results learn mathematics with interpretation Enough. Coefficient of determination (r)2 = 0.2981 . So the magnitude of the relationship between variable X and variable Y is 29.81 %. This means that the relationship between the ability to understand mathematical concepts and the learning outcomes of transformation geometry is 29.81 %.
Keywords
  • ability
  • understanding of concepts
  • concept of transformation geometry
  • Van Hiele level of thinking and learning outcomes.
References
  1. Anisyah, S. (2023). Upaya Meningkatkan Kreativitas Transformasi Geometri Melalui Metode Penemuan (discovery) di Kelas XI MIA 1 SMA Negeri 2 Sibolga. Jurnal Edu Talenta, 2(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.56129/jet.v2i1.38
  2. Bragg, L. A., Herbert, S., Loong, E. Y. K., Vale, C., & Widjaja, W. (2016). Primary teachers notice the impact of language on children’s mathematical reasoning. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 28(4), 523–544. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13394-016-0178-y
  3. Clements, D. H. (2014). Learning and Teaching Measurement (2003 Yearbook). December 2004.
  4. Dinata, K. B. (2019). Problematika Membangun Pemahaman Konsep Geometri Transformasi Mahasiswa Pendidikan Matematika Di Universitas Muhammadiyah Kotabumi Tahun Akademik 2019/2020. Jurnal Eksponen, 9(2). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.47637/eksponen.v9i2.54
  5. Fauziyah, F., Zulkardi, Z., & Putri, R. I. I. (2016). Desain Pembelajaran Materi Belah Ketupat Menggunakan Kain Jumputan Palembang untuk Siswa Kelas VII. Kreano, Jurnal Matematika Kreatif-Inovatif, 7(1), 31–40. https://doi.org/10.15294/kreano.v7i1.4829
  6. Fitriati, L. S. (2015). Penerapan Teori Van Hiele Dalam Meningkatkan Kemampuan Berpikir Siswa Sekolah Menengah Pertama Pada Materi Bangun Ruang Limas. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 2(1), 41–60. https://media.neliti.com/media/publications/269930-penerapan-teori-van-hiele-dalam-meningka-06171c89.pdf
  7. Fona Fitry Burais, H. (2014). Peningkatan kemampuan pemecahan masalah geometri dan tingkat berpikir siswa melalui pembelajaran kooperatif berbasis Teori Van Hiele. VI(2), 52–57. tesis
  8. Hoiriyah, D. (2019). Analisis Kemampuan Pemahaman Konsep Matematis Mahasiswa. Jurnal Logaritma, 7(01), 123–136.
  9. Lestari, W. (2015). Efektifitas Strategi Pembelajarandan Motivasi Belajarterhadap Hasil Belajar. Jurnal Formatif, 2(3), 170–181.
  10. Listiani, V., & Amalia, Rizka, S. (2018). Efektivitas Model Pembelajaran Kontekstual Dengan Pendekatan Teori Van Hiele Terhadap Hasil Belajar Matematika Siswa Kelas V Mi Se-Desa Langkap Bumiayu. 4(2).
  11. M. Hanafi, K.N. Wulandari, R. W. (2017). Transformasi geometri rotasi berbantuan software geogebra. FIBIONACCI, 3(2), 93–102.
  12. Maifa, T. S. (2019). Analisis Kesalahan Mahasiswa dalam Pembuktian Transformasi Geometri. 3(1), 8–14.
  13. Masni, H. (2015). Strategi meningkatkan motivasi belajar mahasiswa. Dikdaya, 5(1), 34–45.
  14. Mason, M. (2021). The van Hiele Levels of Geometric Understanding. Professional Handbook for Teachers, 4, 4–8.
  15. Mentaruk, N., & Tentena, U. K. (2015). Quality Improvement On Transformation Geometry Course Through The Implementation Reciprocal Teaching Model At Mathematics Education Study Program In Christian University Of Tentena. Jurnal Daya Matematis, 3(2), 179–191. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/a91d/e4436229d28376cddfb8608747cd0a32155a.pdf
  16. Ni Wayan Sunita, N. Putri Sumaryani, N. P. (2023). Analisis Kesalahan Mahasiswa Menyelesaikan Soal dalam Mata Kuliah Geometri Transformasi Prodi Pendidikan Matematika Universitas PGRI Mahadewa Indonesia. Emasains Emasains, 12(1), 125–132. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7914198
  17. Nopriana, T. (2017). Berpikir Geometri Melalui Model Pembelajaran Geometri Van Hiele.
  18. Nur’aini, I. L., Harahap, E., Badruzzaman, F. H., & Darmawan, D. (2017). Pembelajaran Matematika Geometri Secara Realistis Dengan GeoGebra. Matematika, 16(2), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.29313/jmtm.v16i2.3900
  19. Nurhidayah, D. A. (2016). Pengaruh Motivasi Berprestasi Dan Gaya Belajar Terhadap Prestasi Belajar Siswa Pada Mata Pelajaran Matematika Smp. Jurnal Dimensi Pendidikan Dan Pembelajaran, 3(2), 13–24. https://doi.org/10.24269/dpp.v3i2.83
  20. Prahmana, R. C. I. (2017). Didactic trajectory of research in mathematics education using research-based learning Didactic trajectory of research in mathematics education using research-based learning. Jurnal of Physics: Conference Series, 839. https://doi.org/doi :10.1088/1742-6596/893/1/012001
  21. Salifu, A. S., Yakubu, A.-R., Issahaku, F., & Tutors, I. (2018). Van Hiele Geometric thinking Levels of Pre-Service teachers’ of E.P. College of Education, Bimbilla-Ghana. Journal of Education and Practice, 9(23), 108–119. www.iiste.org
  22. Sarumaha, R., Harefa, D., Zagoto, M. M., & Riset, K. (2018). Konsepgeometri Transformasi Refleksi Siswa Kelas XII-IPA-B SMA Kampus Telukdalam Melalui Model Pembelajaran Discoverylearning Berbantuan Media. Jurnal Education and Development, 6(1), 90–96.
  23. Sholihah, S. Z., Ekasatya, D., & Afriansyah, A. (2018). Analisis Kesulitan Siswa Dalam Proses Pemecahan Masalah Geometri Berdasarkan Tahapan Berpikir Van Hiele. Jurnal Mosharafa, 6(2), 287–298. http://e-mosharafa.org/
  24. Suharni, S. (2021). Upaya Guru Dalam Meningkatkan Motivasi Belajar Siswa. G-Couns: Jurnal Bimbingan Dan Konseling, 6(1), 172–184. https://doi.org/10.31316/g.couns.v6i1.2198
  25. Sundawan, M. D., Liliana, I., Dewi, K., Noto, M. S., Swadaya, U., Djati, G., Swadaya, U., Djati, G., Swadaya, U., & Djati, G. (2018). Kajian kesulitan belajar mahasiswa dalam kemampuan pembuktian matematis ditinjau dari aspek epistemologi pada mata kuliah geometri transformasi. 4.
  26. Susilawati, E. (2022). Efektivitas Penggunaan Model Guided Discovery Learning Terhadap Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Geometri Dengan Memanfaatkan Software Geogebra Pada Mahasiswa Stkip Budidaya Binjai. Jurnal Serunai Matematika, 14(1), 6–9. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.37755/jsm.v14i1.556
  27. William F. burger, J. M. S. (1986). Teori Van Hiele (Vol. 17, Issue 1, pp. 31–48). Journal for research in mathematics education.
  28. Wiska, S., Musdi, E., Permana, D., & Yerizon. (2020). Meningkatkan kemampuan berpikir kritis matematis peserta didik dengan lembar kerja peserta didik berbasis teori van hiele. FIBONACCI: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika Dan Matematika, 6(1), 59–66. https://doi.org/https://dx.doi.org/10.24853/fbc.6.1.59-66

Downloads

PDF

Statistic

Abstract Views
: 272 times
PDF
: 6 times