Validasi media virtual tour sebagai alat peningkat kemampuan metakognitif siswa: hasil dan implikasinya

  • Ahmad Bukhori Masruri 
    Universitas Sebelas Maret
    Indonesia
  • Sariyatun Sariyatun
    Universitas Sebelas Maret
    Indonesia
  • Sudiyanto Sudiyanto
    Universitas Sebelas Maret
    Indonesia

Abstract

The increasing trend of technological innovation in learning media, in the Industrial Revolution 4.0 era makes it easier for students to access knowledge. Historical knowledge is vulnerable to becoming a pseudo-history which is usually narrated in connection with a historical heritage site. Students who do not have the ability to filter knowledge and are limited by direct access to the site will be vulnerable to being exposed to pseudo-history. This research aims to produce learning media that is suitable for use in the classroom. Media in the form of a virtual tour was chosen to facilitate access and improve metacognitive abilities as a filter for students. The research carried out was research and development (R&D) research with a 4-D approach, which was limited to the development stage due to time constraints. Data analysis based on the results of the media feasibility test assessment scores by curriculum expert validators and media expert validators. From a scale of 5, each score of 4.73 was obtained by curriculum experts. while a score of 4.82 was obtained by media experts. The research results show that virtual tour media is very suitable to be used as one of choice of learning media.
Keywords
  • Media
  • Virtual Tour
  • Metacognitive
References
  1. Allal-Chérif, O. (2022). Intelligent cathedrals: Using augmented reality, virtual reality, and artificial intelligence to provide an intense cultural, historical, and religious visitor experience. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 178, 121604. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2022.121604
  2. Arends, R., & Kilcher, A. (2010). Teaching for student learning. Routledge New York.
  3. Bannert, M., & Mengelkamp, C. (2013). Scaffolding hypermedia learning through metacognitive prompts. Dalam International handbook of metacognition and learning technologies (hlm. 171–186). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-5546-3_12
  4. Borko, H., & Putnam, R. T. (1996). Learning to teach.
  5. Bozkurt, N. (2013). An examination of the links between pre-service teacher’s metacognitive level, learning styles and their achievement of history class. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 93, 1634–1640. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.10.093
  6. Bransford, J., Sherwood, R., Vye, N., & Rieser, J. (1986). Teaching thinking and problem solving: Research foundations. American psychologist, 41(10), 1078. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.41.10.1078
  7. Carvajal, D. A. L., Morita, M. M., & Bilmes, G. M. (2020). Virtual museums. Captured reality and 3D modeling. Journal of Cultural Heritage, 45, 234–239. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.culher.2020.04.013
  8. Desmita. (2017). Psikologi perkembangan peseta didik. Remaja Rosdakarya.
  9. Dickson, W. P. (1981). Children’s oral communication skills. (No Title).
  10. Dignath, C., & Büttner, G. (2018). Teachers’ direct and indirect promotion of self-regulated learning in primary and secondary school mathematics classes–insights from video-based classroom observations and teacher interviews. Metacognition and Learning, 13, 127–157. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-018-9181-x
  11. Donker, A. S., De Boer, H., Kostons, D., Van Ewijk, C. C. D., & van der Werf, M. P. C. (2014). Effectiveness of learning strategy instruction on academic performance: A meta-analysis. Educational Research Review, 11, 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2013.11.002
  12. Drigas, A., & Mitsea, E. (2020a). The 8 pillars of metacognition. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET), 15(21), 162–178. https://www.learntechlib.org/p/218360/
  13. Drigas, A., & Mitsea, E. (2020b). The Triangle of Spiritual Intelligence, Metacognition and Consciousness. Int. J. Recent Contributions Eng. Sci. IT, 8(1), 4–23.
  14. Eduard, B., Ihor, P., Ruslana, K., & Tetiana, Z. (2020). Reflexive competence in metacognitive monitoring of learning activity of HEI students. International Journal of Cognitive Research in Science, Engineering and Education, 8(S), 17–28. https://doi.org/10.23947/2334-8496-2020-8-SI-17-28
  15. Eiris, R., Wen, J., & Gheisari, M. (2022). iVisit-Collaborate: Collaborative problem-solving in multiuser 360-degree panoramic site visits. Computers & Education, 177, 104365. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104365
  16. El-Said, O., & Aziz, H. (2022). Virtual tours a means to an end: An analysis of virtual tours’ role in tourism recovery post COVID-19. Journal of Travel Research, 61(3), 528–548. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047287521997567
  17. Flavell, J. H. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive–developmental inquiry. American psychologist, 34(10), 906. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.34.10.906
  18. Fujs, D. , V. S. , Ž. B. , & V. D. (2022). Improving the efficiency of remote conference tool use for distance learning in higher education: A kano based approach. Computers & Education. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2022.104448
  19. Granjeiro, É. M. (2019). based teaching-learning method: a strategy to motivate and engage students in human physiology classes. Advances in physiology education, 43(4), 553–556. https://doi.org/10.1152/advan.00034.2019
  20. Ihor, P., & Ruslana, K. (2021). Metacognitive awareness and academic self-regulation of hei students. International Journal of Cognitive Research in Science, Engineering and Education, 9(2), 161–172.
  21. Iivari, N., Sharma, S., & Ventä-Olkkonen, L. (2020). Digital transformation of everyday life–How COVID-19 pandemic transformed the basic education of the young generation and why information management research should care? International journal of information management, 55, 102183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2020.102183
  22. Jagielska-Burduk, A., Pszczyński, M., & Stec, P. (2021). Cultural heritage education in UNESCO cultural conventions. Sustainability, 13(6), 3548. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13063548
  23. Kartodirjo, S. (1995). Pemikiran dan Pengembangan Historiografi. Jakarta: Gramedia.
  24. Kochhar, S. K. (1984). Teaching of history. Sterling Publishers Pvt. Ltd.
  25. Kurniawati, K. , D. D. , R. A. , & A. P. (2021). Literasi Sejarah Melalui Bedah Dan Diskusi Film Sejarah. Jurnal Praksis Dan Dedikasi Sosial (JPDS), 4(1), 19–29. https://doi.org/10.17977/um032v4i1p26-29
  26. Lai, E. R. (2011). Metacognition: A literature review. Always learning: Pearson research report, 24, 1–40.
  27. Lakerveld, J. Van, & Gussen, I. (2009). Acquiring key competences through heritage education. Lies Kerkhofs, Alden Biesen.
  28. Li, M., & Yuan, R. (2022). Enhancing students’ metacognitive development in higher education: A classroom-based inquiry. International Journal of Educational Research, 112, 101947. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2022.101947
  29. Lin, X. (2001). Designing metacognitive activities. Educational technology research and development, 49(2), 23–40. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02504926
  30. Listiana, L., Daesusi, R., & Soemantri, S. (2019). Peranan metakognitif dalam pembelajaran dan pengajaran biologi di kelas. Symposium of Biology Education (Symbion), 2(1), 8–19.
  31. Livingston, J. A. (1997). DESCRIPTORS* Cognitive Processes;* Metacognition;* Thinking Skills.
  32. Livingston, J. A. (2003). Metacognition: An Overview.
  33. Lohr, A., Stadler, M., Schultz-Pernice, F., Chernikova, O., Sailer, M., Fischer, F., & Sailer, M. (2021). On powerpointers, clickerers, and digital pros. Computers in Human Behavior. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2021.106715
  34. Mahamid, M. N. L. (2022). Gerakan Ideologi Islam Transnasional di Indonesia dalam Film JKDN Karya Nicko Pandawa. Muslim Heritage, 7(1), 83–109. https://doi.org/10.21154/muslimheritage.v7i1.3546
  35. Mamon, M. A. C., Esperanza, A. G., & Vital, J. A. T. (2020). Based learning: Effects on the metacognitive awareness of senior high school students. IJIET (International Journal of Indonesian Education and Teaching), 4(2), 277–285. https://doi.org/10.24071/ijiet.v4i2.2540
  36. Panadero, E. (2017). A review of self-regulated learning: Six models and four directions for research. Frontiers in psychology, 8, 250270. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00422
  37. Purwanta, H. (2019). Hakekat pendidikan sejarah (1 ed., Vol. 1). UNS Press.
  38. Qechai, S. (2023). UNESCO and the Introduction of Intangible Cultural Heritage. Revue des Sciences Humaines et Sociales de l’Académie du Royaume du Maroc, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.34874/PRSM.shs-arm-vol2iss1.36815
  39. Rahman, A., & Winarsih, M. (2021). Penerapan Literasi Sejarah Dalam Pembelajaran Sejarah Pada Masa Pembelajaran Jarak Jauh di SMA. Jurnal Pendidikan Sejarah, 10(1), 57–76. https://doi.org/10.21009/JPS.101.04
  40. Schraw, G., Crippen, K. J., & Hartley, K. (2006). Promoting self-regulation in science education: Metacognition as part of a broader perspective on learning. Research in science education, 36, 111–139.
  41. Spielmann, N., & Mantonakis, A. (2018). In virtuo: How user-driven interactivity in virtual tours leads to attitude change. Journal of Business Research, 88, 255–264. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.03.037
  42. Stearns, P. N., Seixas, P., & Wineburg, S. (2000). Knowing, teaching, and learning history: National and international perspectives. NYU Press.
  43. Tarricone, P. (2011). The taxonomy of metacognition. Psychology press. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203830529
  44. Tiarasari, A. (2021). The effectiveness of interactive multimedia to improve cognitive skill on Elementary School Students. JPI (Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia), 10(2), 387–395. https://doi.org/10.23887/jpi-undiksha.v8i2.17357
  45. Veenman, M. V. J., Van Hout-Wolters, B. H. A. M., & Afflerbach, P. (2006). Metacognition and learning: Conceptual and methodological considerations. Metacognition and learning, 1, 3–14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-006-6893-0
  46. Vishnu, S., Sathyan, A. R., Sam, A. S., Radhakrishnan, A., Ragavan, S. O., Kandathil, J. V., & Funk, C. (2022). Digital competence of higher education learners in the context of COVID-19 triggered online learning. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 6(1), 100320. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2022.100320
  47. Yulita, D. (2019). Metacognitive in reading: The awareness of less proficient EFL learners on reading strategies. Metathesis: Journal of English Language, Literature, and Teaching, 3(2), 135–145.
  48. Zeitlhofer, I., Hörmann, S., Mann, B., Hallinger, K., & Zumbach, J. (2023). Effects of cognitive and metacognitive prompts on learning performance in digital learning environments. Knowledge, 3(2), 277–292. https://doi.org/10.3390/knowledge3020019
  49. Zepeda, C. D., Richey, J. E., Ronevich, P., & Nokes-Malach, T. J. (2015). Direct instruction of metacognition benefits adolescent science learning, transfer, and motivation: An in vivo study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 107(4), 954. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000022
  50. Zimmerman, B. J. (2013). From cognitive modeling to self-regulation: A social cognitive career path. Educational psychologist, 48(3), 135–147. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2013.794676
  51. Боденова, О. В. (2020). Метакогнитивная компетентность как фактор саморегуляции учебной деятельности студентов. Развитие образования, 2, 13–16. https://doi.org/10.31483/r-74937

Downloads

PDF

Statistic

Abstract Views
: 417 times
PDF
: 18 times