The influence of fiscal decentralization, accountability, and financial performance on the level of corruption in Indonesian provincial governments

Abstract

Corruption is one of the main challenges hindering development and welfare in Indonesia, particularly at the regional government level. This study aims to analyze the effectiveness of anti-corruption programs in provincial governments in Indonesia, focusing on the influence of fiscal decentralization, accountability, and regional financial performance on the level of corruption. The study employs a quantitative approach using panel data obtained from regional financial reports and audit results from the Audit Board of Indonesia (BPK) on provincial governments in Indonesia during the period 2018-2022. The results indicate that fiscal decentralization has a significant impact on the level of corruption, while the variables of accountability and regional financial performance, as measured through audit opinions and regional investment, do not show a significant impact on corruption levels. These findings suggest that although there are financial oversight mechanisms in place, other factors such as transparency, stricter supervision, and public participation in budget management need to be strengthened to enhance the effectiveness of anti-corruption programs at the provincial level. The study recommends the need for a more comprehensive approach to tackling corruption, including governance reforms and strengthening internal controls in each region.
Keywords
  • Corruption Decentralization Accountability Financial Performance Provincial Goverment
References
  1. Adelopo, I., & Rufai, I. (2020). Trust Deficit and Anti-corruption Initiatives. Journal of Business Ethics, 163(3), 429–449. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-018-4059-z
  2. Aditia, I. P. (2023). Pengaruh Opini Audit, Sistem Pengendalian Internal, Belanja Modal, Dan Pendapatan Asli Daerah Pemerintah Daerah Terhadap Tingkat Korupsi Di Indonesia. http://digilib.unila.ac.id/id/eprint/75183
  3. Ajibolade, S. O., & Oboh, C. S. (2017). A critical examination of government budgeting and public funds management in Nigeria. International Journal of Public Leadership, 13(4), 218–242. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPL-11-2016-0045
  4. Alfada, A. (2019). Does Fiscal Decentralization Encourage Corruption in Local Governments? Evidence from Indonesia. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 12(3), 118. https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm12030118
  5. Anggara, S. (2022). Akuntabilitas Publik (1st ed.). CV Pustaka Setia.
  6. Batin, M. H. (2022). Keuangan Publik (1st ed.). KENCANA.
  7. Campbell, S., Greenwood, M., Prior, S., Shearer, T., Walkem, K., Young, S., Bywaters, D., & Walker, K. (2020). Purposive sampling: complex or simple? Research case examples. Journal of Research in Nursing, 25(8), 652–661. https://doi.org/10.1177/1744987120927206
  8. Christin, M. (2017). Dongeng Anti Korupsi. Bitread Publishing.
  9. Ewetan, O. O., Osabohien, R., Matthew, O. A., Babajide, A. A., & Urhie, E. (2020). Fiscal federalism and accountability in Nigeria: an ARDL approach. Journal of Money Laundering Control, 24(2), 359–371. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMLC-05-2020-0046
  10. Fatoni, A. (2020). Fiscal Decentralization Dilemma in Indonesia: Between Corruption Accountability and Probability at Local Levels. Jurnal Bina Praja, 12(1), 103–112. https://doi.org/10.21787/jbp.12.2020.101-110
  11. Fuadi, A., & Mabrur, A. (2021). Faktor-faktor penentu korupsi pada pemerintah daerah di Indonesia. Indonesian Treasury Review Jurnal Perbendaharaan Keuangan Negara Dan Kebijakan Publik, 6(4), 317–328. https://doi.org/10.33105/itrev.v6i4.410
  12. Ghozali, I. (2016). Aplikasi Analisis Multivariate Dengan Program IBM SPSS 23. Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro.
  13. Halim, A. (2016). Analisis Laporan Keuangan. UPP STIM YKPN.
  14. Hoesada, J. (2022). Teori Akuntansi: dalam Hampiran Historiografis Taksonomis. Penerbit Andi.
  15. Jadara, S. M., & Al-Wadi, M. (2021). The roles of transparency and accountability in reducingadministrative and financial corruption. Public Policy and Administration, 20(2), 284–298. https://doi.org/10.13165/VPA-21-20-2-11
  16. Koeswayo, P. S., Handoyo, S., & Abdul Hasyir, D. (2024). Investigating the Relationship between Public Governance and the Corruption Perception Index. Cogent Social Sciences, 10(1), 2342513. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2024.2342513
  17. Konte, M., & Vincent, R. C. (2021). Mining and quality of public services: The role of local governance and decentralization. World Development, 140, 105350. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2020.105350
  18. Mardiasmo. (2018). Akuntansi Sektor Publik. Andi Publisher.
  19. Mugellini, G., Della Bella, S., Colagrossi, M., Isenring, G. L., & Killias, M. (2021). Public sector reforms and their impact on the level of corruption: A systematic review. Campbell Systematic Reviews, 17(2), e1173. https://doi.org/10.1002/cl2.1173
  20. Nor, M. I., & Mohamed, A. A. (2024). Investigating the dynamics of tax evasion and revenue leakage in somali customs. PloS One, 19(6), e0303622. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0303622
  21. Pace, D. S. (2021). Probability and non-probability sampling-an entry point for undergraduate researchers. International Journal of Quantitative and Qualitative Research Methods, 9(2), 1–15. https://ssrn.com/abstract=3851952
  22. Prasetyo, T. . (2023). Korupsi: Ancaman Tersembunyi yang Merusak Sendi-sendi Kehidupan Bangsa dan Negara. Kementrian Keuangan. https://www.djkn.kemenkeu.go.id/
  23. Putra, N. R., & Linda, R. (2022). Corruption in Indonesia: A challenge for social changes. Integrity: Anti-Corruption Journal, 8(1), 13–14. https://doi.org/10.32697
  24. Remeikienė, R., & Gaspareniene, L. (2023). Effects of Economic and Financial Crime on the Government Budget and the Quality of Public Services BT - Economic and Financial Crime, Sustainability and Good Governance (M. V. Achim (ed.); pp. 173–204). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-34082-6_8
  25. Salahudin, A. (2018). Pendidikan AntiKorupsi (1st ed.). CV Pustaka Setia.
  26. Saraswati, S. R., & Triyanto, D. N. (2020). Pengaruh Temuan Audit, Transparansi, Dan Akuntabilitas Terhadap Tingkat Korupsi (Studi pada Pemerintah Daerah Jawa Timur Tahun 2015-2018). E-Proceeding of Management, 7.
  27. Sistiana, M., & Makmur, M. H. (2014). Derajat desentralisasi fiskal daerah kabupaten/kota. JIANA (Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi Negara), 12(4), 277–286.
  28. Suhardjanto, D., Djuminah, D., & Agustiningsih, S. W. (2020). Regional Financial Performance, Audit Function, and Corruption Levels in Indonesia. Jurnal Akuntansi Dan Bisnis, 20(1), 81. https://doi.org/10.20961/jab.v20i1.474
  29. Suryana, R. (2023). I’M GONE (Integrity Minimal, Greed, Opportunity, Need, Exposure) as the Causes of the Collapse of the KPK’s Anti-Corruption Goal. Asia Pacific Fraud Journal, 8(1), 39–48. https://doi.org/10.21532/apfjournal.v8i1.267
  30. Susanto, H. (2019). Analisis Rasio Keuangan Untuk Mengukur Kinerja Keuangan Pemerintah Daerah Kota Mataram. Distribusi - Journal of Management and Business,.
  31. Syarif, A. (2023). Fiscal Decentralization and Corruption: The Facts of Regional Autonomy Policies in Indonesia. Jurnal Ilmu Sosial Dan Ilmu Politik, 27(1), 60–73. https://doi.org/10.22146/jsp.69007
  32. Wibowo, A. (2023). Global economic challenges for Indonesia: Equitable development for sustainable prosperity. Prosiding Seminar Teknologi, Akuntansi, Bisnis, Ekonomi, Dan Komunitas, 3, 23–40.
  33. Wicaksono, G. S., & Prabowo, T. J. W. (2022). Analisis Faktor-Faktor yang Mempengaruhi Korupsi pada Pemerintah Daerah di Jawa Tengah Menggunakan Teori Fraud Triangle. Owner, 6(1), 1016–1028. https://doi.org/10.33395/owner.v6i1.710
  34. Yunan, Z. Y., Freyens, B., Vidyattama, Y., & Mohanty, I. (2023). Spread of corruption in Indonesia after decentralisation: a spatiotemporal analysis. Oxford Development Studies, 51(2), 198–215. https://doi.org/10.1080/13600818.2022.2162493
  35. Zabar, T. (2022). Korupsi Kepala Daerah. Indonesia Corruption Watch. https://antikorupsi.org/id/korupsi-kepala-daerah