Evaluation of policy for granting of rock mining business license in Palu Donggala axis road

Abstract

This study evaluates the implementation effectiveness of the Rock Mining Business License (IUP) policy in Palu City and Donggala Regency, Central Sulawesi. The focus lies on the extent to which the implementation aligns with good mining practices and its socio-environmental impacts. Despite the strategic value of the Palu–Donggala area, the policy has led to significant issues, including non-compliance by IUP holders, weak administrative oversight, and minimal contributions to community welfare. Some companies operate beyond their licensed areas and neglect environmental standards, resulting in increased pollution and deteriorating public health. Data were collected through interviews with key stakeholders, including government officials, company representatives, and impacted communities. The analysis employed the model developed by Miles, Huberman, and Saldana, consisting of data condensation, display, and conclusion drawing. The findings show that in terms of input, companies have not invested adequately in human resource development, and the infrastructure at mining sites remains poor. Regarding the process, operational practices often deviate from applicable regulations, and supervisory mechanisms are weak. The output dimension reveals that negative impacts such as pollution, infrastructure degradation, and low absorption of local labor outweigh the perceived benefits to surrounding communities. In the outcome dimension, the policy tends to generate adverse effects on both the environment and people’s lives, leading to negative perceptions among affected residents. In conclusion, the implementation of the rock mining license policy in the Palu–Donggala area has not met expectations and requires urgent policy reform and enforcement to ensure alignment with regulatory standards, environmental sustainability, and equitable community outcomes.

Keywords
  • Evaluation
  • Policy
  • Mining Business License
References
  1. Arikunto, S. 2013. Prosedur Penelitian: Suatu Pendekatan Praktik. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
  2. Badjuri, Abdulkahar dan Yuwono, Teguh. 2009. Kebijakan Publik Konsep & Strategi. Cetakan Ke 3. Semarang: Undip Press.
  3. Dunn, William N. 2003. Analisis Kebijakan Publik. Yogyakarta: Gadjah Mada University Press.
  4. Islamy, Irfan. 2009. Prinsip-prinsip Perumusan Kebijaksanaan Negara. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
  5. Latifa. 2019. Evaluasi Kebijakan Pajak Bahan Galian Golongan C Di Kabupaten Donggala. Katalogis, Volume 7 Nomor 2.
  6. Miles, M.B, Huberman, A.M, dan Saldana, J. 2014. Qualitative Data Analysis, A Methods Sourcebook, Edition 3. USA: Sage Publications. Terjemahan Tjetjep Rohindi Rohidi, Jakarta: UI-Press.
  7. Muchsin, dan Fadillah. P. 2002. Hukum dan Kebijakan Publik. Malang: Averroes Press.
  8. Redaksi Jaring. 2016. Terpapar Debu, Warga Berpotensi Terjangkit ISPA. Dalam https://jaring.id/. (diakses pada tanggal 16 November 2022).
  9. Salim HS. 2012. Hukum Pertambangan di Indonesia. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.
  10. Suharno. 2013. Dasar-Dasar Kebijakan Publik. Yogyakarta: Ombak.
  11. Sulistio, Eko Budi. 2012. Buku Ajar Studi Kebijakan Publik. Bandar Lampung: Lembaga Penelitian Universitas Lampung.
  12. Supramono, Gatot. 2012. Hukum Pertambangan Mineral dan Batu Bara di Indonesia. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
  13. Wibawa, Samodra. 2011. Politik Perumusan Kebijakan Publik. Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu.
  14. Winarno, Budi. 2014. Kebijakan Publik Teori, Proses dan Studi Kasus. Cetakan Kedua. Yogyakarta: CAPS.