Evaluation of the effectiveness of agricultural cooperative management in optimizing resources and business sustainability

  • Elfi Rahmadani 
    Universitas Islam Negeri Sultan Syarif Kasim Riau
    Indonesia
  • Nurhidayati Nurhidayati
    Universitas Islam Negeri Sultan Syarif Kasim Riau
    Indonesia
  • Ridal Asri Wahyudi
    Universitas Islam Negeri Sultan Syarif Kasim Riau
    Indonesia

Abstract

This study evaluates the effectiveness of agricultural cooperative management in optimizing resources and achieving business sustainability. Using a mixed-methods approach, data were collected through surveys involving 150 agricultural cooperatives across five regions in Indonesia and in-depth interviews with cooperative managers. The findings reveal that cooperatives that effectively optimize financial, human, and natural resources experience up to a 60% increase in turnover and a 25% reduction in operational costs, particularly those that incorporate technology such as IoT for real-time monitoring of soil moisture and climate conditions. Regression analysis indicates a strong positive correlation between strategic planning, technology adoption, and cooperative sustainability, with cooperatives implementing structured planning showing consistent growth over 3–5 years. Despite these benefits, challenges remain, including limited managerial training, restricted access to capital, and insufficient participation in decision-making. This study contributes to the literature by offering empirical evidence of the quantifiable impact of technology and structured resource management on cooperative sustainability, filling the gap in previous research that often overlooked the integration of financial, technological, and managerial strategies. The findings underscore the need for policy interventions, increased training programs, and financial support to facilitate technology adoption, ensuring cooperatives remain competitive in the evolving agricultural landscape.

Keywords
  • Agricultural Cooperatives
  • Resource Management
  • Business Sustainability
  • Mixed Methods
  • Case Studies
  • Surveys.
Lisensing Information
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

References
  1. Almeida, F. (2018). Strategies to perform a mixed methods study. European Journal of Education Studies.
  2. Apparao, D., Garnevska, E., & Shadbolt, N. (2019). Examining commitment, heterogeneity and social capital within the membership base of agricultural co-operatives—A conceptual framework. Journal of Co-Operative Organization and Management, 7(1), 42–50.
  3. Barbosa, B. (2024). Contemporary trends in innovative marketing strategies. IGI Global.
  4. Birchall, J. (2003). Rediscovering the cooperative advantage-Poverty reduction through self-help. International Labour Organisation.
  5. Birchall, J. (2004). Cooperatives and the millennium development goals.
  6. Carlucci, D., Stasi, A., Nardone, G., & Seccia, A. (2013). Explaining price variability in the Italian yogurt market: a hedonic analysis. Agribusiness, 29(2), 194–206.
  7. Chambo, S. A. (2009). Agricultural co-operatives: Role in food security and rural development. A Paper Presented to Expert Group Meeting on Co-Operatives on 28th to 30th April.
  8. Cheney, G., Santa Cruz, I., Peredo, A. M., & Nazareno, E. (2014). Worker cooperatives as an organizational alternative: Challenges, achievements and promise in business governance and ownership. Organization, 21(5), 591–603.
  9. Curry, L. A., Nembhard, I. M., & Bradley, E. H. (2009). Qualitative and mixed methods provide unique contributions to outcomes research. Circulation, 119(10), 1442–1452.
  10. Dahoklory, F. S., Saputri, D. Y., Arisandi, D., Tuamely, J., & Sappaile, B. I. (2024). The Implementation of the 2013 Curriculum: Concept, Application and Quantitative, Qualitative and R&D Approaches. International Journal of Educational Research Excellence (IJERE), 3(1), 352–358.
  11. Dillon, J. L., & Hardaker, J. B. (1980). Farm management research for small farmer development (Vol. 41). Food & Agriculture Org.
  12. Franken, J. R. V, & Cook, M. L. (2019). Do corporate governance recommendations apply to US agricultural cooperatives? Sustainability, 11(19), 5321.
  13. Getnet, K., & Anullo, T. (2012). Agricultural cooperatives and rural livelihoods: Evidence from Ethiopia. Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, 83(2), 181–198.
  14. Giagnocavo, C. L., Bienvenido Bárcena, J. F., Ming, L., Yurong, Z., Sánchez Molina, J. A., & Xinting, Y. (2017). Agricultural cooperatives and the role of organisational models in new intelligent traceability systems and big data analysis.
  15. Howden, S. M., Soussana, J.-F., Tubiello, F. N., Chhetri, N., Dunlop, M., & Meinke, H. (2007). Adapting agriculture to climate change. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 104(50), 19691–19696.
  16. Kemenkop UKM. (2020). Data koperasi di Indonesia. Kementerian Koperasi dan Usaha Kecil Menengah.
  17. Kementerian Pertanian Republik Indonesia. (2021). Statistik pertanian 2021. Kementerian Pertanian RI.
  18. LeVay, C. (1983). Agricultural co‐operative theory: A review. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 34(1), 1–44.
  19. Morley, S., Kennedy, A., Pradesha, A., & Hadiwidjaja, G. (2019). The role of agriculture in the structural transformation of Indonesia (Vol. 1838). Intl Food Policy Res Inst.
  20. Nefale, T. A. (2016). The role of agricultural cooperatives in poverty reduction: A case study of selected cooperatives in the four local municipalities of Vhembe district municipality, Limpopo Province, South Africa.
  21. Nuraini, A., Kusmulyono, M. S., Ratna, F. Y., Septina, N., Bhinekawati, R., Asgha, B., Sijabat, R., Handoko, R., Jahroh, S., & Kusuma, S. E. (2019). Menggagas Pembelajaran Kewirausahaan Sosial. Penerbit Atma Jaya.
  22. Richter, B., & Hanf, J. H. (2021). Cooperatives in the wine industry: Sustainable management practices and digitalisation. Sustainability, 13(10), 5543.
  23. Seetharaman, S. P., & Shingi, P. M. (1992). Agribusiness cooperatives. International Cooperative Alliance, New Delhi.
  24. Spielman, D. J., & Von Grebmer, K. (2004). Public-private partnerships in agricultural research: an analysis of challenges facing industry and the Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research (Vol. 113). Intl Food Policy Res Inst.
  25. Staatz, J. M. (1987). The structural characteristics of farmer cooperatives and their behavioral consequences. Cooperative Theory: New Approaches, 18, 33–60.
  26. Suter, B. (2009). Validity in Qualitative Research on Personal Relationships. Kentucky Journal of Communication, 28(2).
  27. Utami, C. W., Indrianto, A. T. L., & Pratama, I. (2019). Agricultural Technology Adoption in Indonesia: The Role of the Agriculture Extension Service, the Rural Financing and the Institutional Context of the Lender.

Downloads

PDF

Statistic

Abstract Views
: 102 times
PDF
: 54 times