Digitalizing employment services: infrastructure, competency, and cultural challenges of civil servants
-
Published: September 14, 2025
-
Page: 140-150
Abstract
This study examines the challenges in the digitization of personnel services within the management system of the State Civil Apparatus in Keerom Regency. This study identifies several key barriers, including limited digital infrastructure, insufficient internet connectivity, a lack of technological devices, low competency among civil servants in utilizing information and communication technology, as well as cultural resistance to digital transformation. A descriptive qualitative approach is employed through the methods of field observation, in-depth interviews, and analysis of policy documents. The research findings indicate that the efforts for digitalization are not evenly distributed across all work units, as the digital system remains centralized in the main personnel unit, while the supporting units still rely on manual processes. Furthermore, the lack of standardized application processes and data results in low efficiency and accountability in services. This study presents strategic steps to address the identified issues, including the enhancement of infrastructure, the improvement of digital competencies among civil servants through ongoing training, and the encouragement of a workplace culture that embraces digital technology. The results of this study contribute to the development of a model for accelerating the digitalization of civil servants at the regional level to enhance the quality of public services that are responsive, integrated, and sustainable. The significance of this study lies in its localized focus on a 3T (frontier, outermost, underdeveloped) region, providing a nuanced understanding of digital transformation challenges often overlooked in centralized policy-making.
- Digitalization
- Public services
- Civil servants
- Infrastructure
- Competence

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
- Abdolhosseinzadeh, M., Mohammadi, F., & Abdolhamid, M. (2023). Identifying and prioritizing barriers and challenges of Social Innovation implementation in the Public Sector. European Public and Social Innovation Review, 8(1), 56–72. https://doi.org/10.31637/epsir.23-1.4
- Alpen, J., Dlis, F., Hernawan, Widiastuti, Apriani, L., Kurniawan, E., & Sofyan, D. (2022). Trends in Scientific Publication of Traditional Game Learning Models In Physical Education and Sports in Indonesia: A Bibliometric Analysis. Journal Sport Area, 7(2), 214–226. https://doi.org/10.25299/sportarea.2022.vol7(2).9072
- Alvarenga, A., Matos, F., Godina, R., & Matias, J. C. O. (2020). Digital transformation and knowledge management in the public sector. Sustainability, 12(14), 5824. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12145824
- Arsad, R. (2023). Obstacles and Challenges in Law Enforcement Against Corruption in Public Services. Russian Law Journal, XI(3), 3331–3339. https://russianlawjournal.org/index.php/journal/article/view/2937%0Ahttps://russianlawjournal.org/index.php/journal/article/download/2937/1759
- Bana, J. O. (2022). Impact of Forensic Accounting on Fraud Prevention in Nigeria Public Sector. Bingham International Journal of Accounting and Finance (BIJAF), 7(2), 261–340.
- Barbour, L. R., Woods, J. L., & Brimblecombe, J. K. (2023). Local government policy to facilitate healthy and sustainable diets and the broader policy hierarchy: insights from Milan Urban Food Policy Pact cities. Health Research Policy and Systems, 21(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12961-023-00988-6
- Bradshaw, C., Atkinson, S., & Doody, O. (2017). Employing a qualitative descriptive approach in health care research. Nurse Researcher, 25(4), 19–23.
- Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2016). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101.
- Cahyarini, B. R., & Samsara, L. (2021). The challenges of digital competency implementation towards world class bureaucracy. Jurnal Borneo Administrator, 17(2), 259–274. https://samarinda.lan.go.id/jba/index.php/jba/article/view/825
- Ciancarini, P., Giancarlo, R., & Grimaudo, G. (2023). Digital Transformation in the Public Administrations: A Guided Tour For Computer Scientists. ArXiv. https://arxiv.org/abs/2305.05551
- Colorafi, K. J., & Evans, B. (2016). Qualitative descriptive methods: The poor cousin of health research? Journal of Medical Education and Curricular Development, 3, JMECD-S20377.
- Cordella, A., & Tempini, N. (2015). E-government and organizational change: Reappraising the role of ICT and bureaucracy in public service delivery. Government Information Quarterly, 32(3), 279–286. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2015.03.005
- Costa, S. L. R., & Broietti, F. C. D. (2021). Scientific Practices in Science Education Publications: An Analysis of Research Contexts. Science Education International, 32(4), 282–291. https://doi.org/10.33828/sei.v32.i4.1
- Davis, F. D. (2019). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340.
- Deni, S., Husain, T., & Deni, A. (2020). Bureaucracy and Challenges in Digital Era: A New Concept of Information Technology Integration in the Archipelagic Country. Journal of Public Policy and Administration, 4(4), 71–77. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jppa.20200404.12
- Djatmiko, G. H., Sinaga, O., & Pawirosumarto, S. (2025). Digital Transformation and Social Inclusion in Public Services. Sustainability, 17(7), 2908.
- Doaa, D. I., & Amer, S. A. (2021). Egyptian public’s knowledge, attitudes, perceptions, and practices toward covid-19 infection and their determinants. A cross-sectional study, 2020. Open Access Macedonian Journal of Medical Sciences, 9(E), 250–259. https://doi.org/10.3889/oamjms.2021.5797
- Eisenmenger, N., Pichler, M., Krenmayr, N., Noll, D., Plank, B., Schalmann, E., Wandl, M.-T., & Gingrich, S. (2020). The Sustainable Development Goals prioritize economic growth over sustainable resource use: a critical reflection on the SDGs from a socio-ecological perspective. Sustainability Science, 15(4), 1106–1107. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-020-00813-x
- Farnham, D., & Horton, S. (2016). Managing People in the Public Services. London: Macmillan.
- Fitriani, F., Nurmandi, A., & Lawelai, H. (2024). Trends and Challenges of Digital Transformation in the Public Sector: Policy Implications for Improving Public Services in Indonesia. ARISTO Journal, 13(2).
- Fox, M. B. (2016). Regulating public offerings of truly new securities: First principles. Duke Law Journal, 66(3), 673–727. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2901418
- Guttentag, M. (2018). A Light in Digital Darkness: Public Broadband after Tennessee v. FCC. The Yale Journal of Law and Technology, 20(2), 311–375.
- Holmes, L., Cresswell, K., Williams, S., Parsons, S., Keane, A., Wilson, C., Islam, S., Joseph, O., Miah, J., Robinson, E., & Starling, B. (2019). Innovating public engagement and patient involvement through strategic collaboration and practice. Research Involvement and Engagement, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40900-019-0160-4
- Ingsih, K., Astuti, S. D., & Riyanto, F. (2024). The role of digital competence in improving service quality and employee performance. SA Journal of Human Resource Management, 22.
- Junaidi, Hendrian, & Syahputra, B. E. (2024). Fraud Detection in Public Sector Institutions: an Empirical Study in Indonesia. Cogent Business and Management, 11(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2024.2404479
- Kabudi, T., Pappas, I., & Olsen, D. H. (2021a). AI-enabled adaptive learning systems: A systematic mapping of the literature. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 2(December 2020), 100017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2021.100017
- Kabudi, T., Pappas, I., & Olsen, D. H. (2021b). AI-enabled adaptive learning systems: A systematic mapping of the literature. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 2(December 2020), 100017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2021.100017
- Latupeirissa, J. J. P., Dewi, N. L. Y., & Prayana, I. K. R. (2024). Transforming Public Service Delivery: A Comprehensive Review of Digitization Initiatives. Sustainability, 16(7), 2818. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16072818
- Ligar Abdillah, & Afriandi, F. (2023). Mapping Local Potential of Coastal Communities to Support Sustainable Empowerment. Jurnal Ilmu Sosial Dan Humaniora, 12(3), 463–473. https://doi.org/10.23887/jish.v12i3.66181
- Manazir, S. H. (2023). Reimagining public policy formulation and analysis: a comprehensive theoretical framework for public policy. Discover Global Society, 1(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44282-023-00018-4
- Marder, I. D. (2022). Mapping restorative justice and restorative practices in criminal justice in the Republic of Ireland. International Journal of Law, Crime and Justice, 70(March), 100544. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijlcj.2022.100544
- Mushore, L., & Kyobe, M. (2019). Digital literate public servants and their role in digital transformation. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 32(1), 19–37.
- Mustafa, K. K., & Deodatus, P. S. (2021). Technology and Immigration System: A New Paradigm for Improving Government Service Delivery in Tanzania. PanAfrican Journal of Governance and Development (PJGD), 2(2): 81-106. https://doi.org/10.46404/panjogov.v2i2.3231.
- Nagel, M. L. (2025). The Challenge of Balancing Innovation and Tradition in the Public Sector. American Review of Public Administration.
- Oliveira, P. N., & Rowe, D. E. O. (2018). Organizational commitment in the public sector: review and research agenda. Revista Pensamento Contemporâneo Em Administração, 12(2), 43–53. https://doi.org/10.12712/rpca.v12i2.1259
- Palinkas, L. A., Horwitz, S. M., Green, C. A., Wisdom, J. P., Duan, N., & Hoagwood, K. (2015). Purposeful sampling for qualitative data collection and analysis in mixed method implementation research. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 42(5), 533–544.
- Prakasa, S. U. W., Hariri, A., Haq, H. S., Arafah, A. R., & Sahid, M. M. (2023). Public Procurement Nexus Social for Mitigate the Corruption: Lesson from Indonesia. Lex Scientia Law Review, 7(2), 413–448. https://doi.org/10.15294/lesrev.v7i2.72630
- Setyawan, Y. F., Gumilar, A., & Apriliani, I. (2023). Nexus between Digital Competency Level and Performance Level of State Civil Apparatus. Journal La Sociale, 6(2).
- South, T. G., & America, S. (2025). Guest editorial : Critically exploring transdisciplinary qualitative research in the Global South. Qualitative Research Journal, 25(2), 117–124. https://doi.org/10.1108/QRJ-03-2025-315
- Su, S., Baird, K., & Blair, B. (2023). Employee organizational commitment in the Australian public sector. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 24(2), 243–264. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2012.731775
- Suharto, D. G., Botha, H. H., Haryanti, R. H., & Wahyunengseh, R. D. (2018). Community Marginalization as the Effect of Public Policy in Democratic Governance Era. Bisnis & Birokrasi Journal, 25(3), 105–113. https://doi.org/10.20476/jbb.v25i3.9967
- Sulistyowati, W. A., Alrajawy, I., & Yulianto, A. (2020). Factors Contributing to E-Government Adoption in Indonesia—Extended TAM with Trust. In Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems (Vol. 118). Springer.
- Sulmiah, S. (2024). Digital Transformation in the Public Sector: Implementation of SIASN in Makassar. Pinisi Journal of Social Science.
- Vázquez-Cano, E., Parra-González, M. E., Segura-Robles, A., & López-Meneses, E. (2022). The Negative Effects of Technology on Education: A Bibliometric and Topic Modeling Mapping Analysis (2008-2019). International Journal of Instruction, 15(2), 37–60. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2022.1523a
- Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2023). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425–478.
- Warsono, H., Yuwono, T., & Putranti, I. R. (2023). Analyzing TAM for collaborative governance in public administration: Evidence of digital governance. International Journal of Data and Network Science, 7(1), 41–48.