Teaching game for understanding model: increasing motivation and students’ physical fitness

Syamsuar Syamsuar (1), Zelhendri Zen (2),
(1) Universitas Negeri Padang  Indonesia
(2) Universitas Negeri Padang  Indonesia

Corresponding Author


DOI : https://doi.org/10.29210/02021951

Full Text:    Language : en

Abstract


This study aims to describe the effect of Teaching Game for Understanding (TGfU) in increasing the students’ motivation and physical fitness. TGfU is a training concept of sport based on game. It is not only have meaning as strengthening educational praxis in fields of sport-game separately, but rather to develop an educational approach to the problems solving in tactical strategy in a competition of the sport-game, and also about attitude, motivation, responsibility for the task, collaboration, etc. Method of this study uses a qualitative approach with classroom action research. The results of the study reported that method of TGfU can increase students’ motivation and physical fitness especially in the second cycle of teaching and learning in the field. For sport teacher is advised to use this model in order to improve students’ participation, motivation, tactical cognitive and strategy and sport achievement of their physical fitness, especially for the subject matter of sport required the game approach.

References


Abbas (2017) Integrated Learning Model as The Best Practice on Physical Fitness. Journal The 1th International Conference on Education Innovation (ICEI). Volume.1 p, 749-757

David Kirk and Ann Macphail .(2002). Teaching Games for Understanding and Situated Learning: Rethinking the Bunker-Thorpe Model. Journal of teaching in Physical Education,21, 177-192.

Dodds, P., Griffin, L.L., & Placek, J.L. (2001). Chapter 2. A selected review of the litera¬ture on development of learners’ domain-specific knowledge. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education [Monograph], 20, 301-313.

Eggen dalam Wardani (2005) Model Belajar Mengajar. Padang; FPTK – IKIP Padang.

Emzir. 2008. Metodologi Penelitian Pendidikan : Kuantitatif dan Kualitatif. Jakarta : Raja Grafindo Persada.

Hellison (2009) Pembelajaran Sikap Bertanggung Jawab dan Sikap Sosial Melalui Pendidikan Jasmani di Sekolah rendah (Online) Http://file.Upi.edu.

Hopper and Kruisselbrink, D.(2002). Teaching Games for Understanding: What Does It Look Like and How Does It Influence Student Skill Learning and Game Performance?

Huberman, M., & Miles, M. B. (2002). The qualitative researcher's companion. Sage.

James L.M., M.A&Nicholas.L.H.(2002). The inclusion of optimal challenge in teaching games for understanding.: The physical educator: Phi Epsilon Kappa.

Kirk, D., & MacPhail, A. (2002). Teaching games for understanding and situated learning: Rethinking the Bunker-Thorpe model. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 21, 177-192.

Luthan Rusli. (2001) Olahraga dan etika. fair play. jakarta direktorat pembudayaan ilmu pengetahuan dan teknologi olahraga. Direktorat jendral olahraga. Departeman pendidikan nasional.

McDonald, G. (2005). The Role of the Board in Building. Strategic Capability: Towards an Integrated Model of Sport Governane. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 147-161.

Nicholas L. Holt, William B. Strean, and Enrique Garcia Bengoechea. (2002). Expanding the Teaching Games for Understanding Model: Newavenues for future research and practice. Journal of teaching in Physical Education, 21, 162-176.

Rink, Perancis, dan Graham (1996). Teaching Game for Understanding. Champaign,Illinois:Human Kinetics.

Sugiyono. (2010). Metode penelitian kuantitatif dan kualitatif. Bandung alfa beta.

Toto Subroto, Titin Juliantine dan Yuyun Yudiana. (2011) Model-model Pembelajaran Jasmani. Bandung : FPOK UPI.

Werner, P., Bunker, D., & Thorpe, R. (1996). Teaching games for understanding : Evolution of a model. Journal of Physical Education, Recreation and Dance, 67(1),28-33. 41


Article Metrics

 Abstract Views : 1218 times
 PDF Downloaded : 0 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.